Pinned Tweet
View from the threshold of the #Nietzsche-Haus, Sils Maria, October 1992.
Rob Sica retweeted
1/ Ask an AI about a conspiracy theory and it'll almost always tell you the claim is false. Whether it also tells you your concern is reasonable depends on whether the theory blames your side or the other one. 135,845 conversations, seven @OpenAI models.
osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4y…
Rob Sica retweeted
New Research from NDSU Challey Institute finds unis with Institutional Neutrality policies have students that are statistically significantly less likely to be in favor of taking illiberal actions. The impact of Kalven adoptions appears greater than Chicago principles adoptions.
Rob Sica retweeted
In a new essay, I argue that you can outlaw profit-seeking companies, but you can never abolish the pursuit of personal advantage and social standing. If you take one currency of competition away, people will compete in another. This has important lessons for how to think - and not to think - about politics. Excerpt 👇: conspicuouscognition.com/p/y…
Rob Sica retweeted
Bonus: the paper includes a table summarizing 12 major objections to evolutionary psychology alongside the standard responses. Useful as a quick reference for teaching or for your next debate.
✨️✨️✨️
"Although the field often is considered controversial, it nevertheless seems that an adequate naturalistic understanding of human behavior requires a science of evolutionary psychology."
link.springer.com/article/10…
Rob Sica retweeted
a friend in ICU with severe flu & pneumonia & complications & well-meaning folks send her "speedy recovery!" greetings.
well, no.
🔪"Academic freedom is a worthy norm insofar as it protects the controversial opinions of scholars rewarded on grounds of merit, not when it merely enforces the prejudices of the majority." onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
✨🎯💯
"Mean is a brave book. Fearless, deeply personal, and grounded in rigorous science, Mean names the quiet cruelty women direct at one another and refuses to look away." amazon.com/dp/B0H5KZVHQY?lv=…
Rob Sica retweeted
I don't understand people who say women who have casual sex are celebrated. If you fuck like a man, other women in normie culture will destroy you. The stigma against promiscuity is WAY bigger than the stigma against prudishness.
One major revelation from the recent release of a full text message timeline from the sexual assault case at Cornell is that the gang rape narrative originated entirely with Jane Doe’s sorority sisters, who preferred it for obvious reasons. My latest at @thefp:
Rob Sica retweeted
Some academics have views about LLMs that wouldn’t survive an hour with a frontier model.
Rob Sica retweeted
Sexual regret
Men were 2.7 times as likely as women to regret the last time they passed up casual sex (43% vs. 16%, d = 0.64, N = 15,182).
Women were twice as likely as men to regret the last time they had casual sex (46% vs. 23%, d = 0.58, N = 13,814).
labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/file…
🔪"Philosophy permits and encourages the questioning of *everything.* There are no sacrosanct starting points or unchallengeable framework assumptions... don't expect good arguments in philosophy to convince all comers."
academic.oup.com/book/63639/…
5
262
Rob Sica retweeted
Replying to @CostelloWilliam @robsica
I started reading this book and couldn’t finish it… filed in the science fiction section🤣
Rob Sica retweeted
This was certainly one of our wildest research projects -- and it's finally published in PNAS (@PNASNews)!
𝗖𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗜 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴?
pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.26…
Spearheaded by @GuXuemei , we developed 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗲, combining LLMs with a knowledge graph of 58 million scientific papers to generate personalized research ideas and suggest unexpected collaborations.
The really unusual part was our evaluation:
We asked 𝟭𝟬𝟬 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 from 50 Max Planck Institutes, in the fields from physics, chemistry, biology, and computer science to the humanities, to evaluate 𝟰,𝟱𝟬𝟬 𝗔𝗜-𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘀.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the (by far) largest interdisciplinary human evaluation of AI-generated research ideas involving experienced scientists.
𝗦𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴:
• 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 seems to be anti-correlated with 𝗵𝗶𝗴𝗵 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁
• Neural Networks can predict the personalized interest of scientific ideas!
• Even LLMs can zero-shot predict scientific interest of ideas, without access to human evaluation data!
Behind the scenes: more than 1,000 emails, over 100 participating group leaders, and several human researchers generating ideas for our human baseline.
This was only possible because of the large interdisciplinary setting of the @maxplanckpress, and the open-mindedness of their PIs and research group leaders.
For me personally, the most exciting part of this study is that we finally begin to me 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗱𝘆 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 of AIs, and hopefully will improve the creativity of idea-generation in the future significantly.
#AIforScience #ScientificDiscovery
Rob Sica retweeted
Sharing this interview on Austrian tv even though they butchered my hair in make-up ooe.orf.at/magazin/stories/3…
"The 'metaphysical selfishness' that Spinoza disdains—the world of discrete human beings—makes room for moral selfishness, true; but it makes room, too, for the dignity of the singular person."
archive.ph/eIuBR
1
256
Rob Sica retweeted
Why Do I Want Myself in Particular to Exist in Ten Years?
I dearly hope to be alive in a decade -- but what if anything justifies this intensity of feeling?
(Reflections inspired by my recent cancer diagnosis.)
schwitzsplinters.blogspot.co…
Rob Sica retweeted
“Men are from Mars, women are from Venus” is such a tired caricature of evolutionary psychology.
We expect men and women to be similar where our ancestors faced similar adaptive challenges, and to differ where those challenges diverged (Buss, 1995).
And that’s precisely what research shows. Across 106 meta-analyses, 85% of the psychological sex differences examined were small or very small (Zell et al., 2015).
So where would we expect a sizable difference? One domain is the desire for sexual variety. Additional sexual partners could increase an ancestral man’s reproductive success far more than an ancestral woman’s. That’s why Sexual Strategies Theory predicts that men, on average, will have a stronger desire for additional partners (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).
This is one of the most reliable sex differences in mating psychology. For instance, @PsychoSchmitt Schmitt (2005) found that men were more open to sex without commitment in all 48 countries studied (N = 14,059, overall d = .74). In an independent survey of over 200,000 people across 53 countries, Lippa (2009) found the same difference in attitudes toward casual sex (mean d = .74).
Take this recent meta-analysis of 211 studies and 621,463 people. Men reported a higher sex drive overall (g = .69), measured by how often they thought or fantasized about sex, felt sexual desire, and masturbated (Frankenbach et al., 2022).
Some scholars emphasize the much smaller difference in desire for one’s own partner (g = .27) to play down sex differences in sexual desire. This is misleading.
Men reported much stronger sexual desire on first seeing someone attractive (g = .67). The difference was larger still in how often men and women thought or fantasized about sex with someone other than their partner (g = .82). In other words, the gap is largest precisely where evolutionary psychologists expect it.
Furthermore, even small differences can add up. Del Giudice and colleagues (2012) found that across 15 personality traits, men and women differed by only about a quarter of a standard deviation per trait on average. Yet when they examined those same traits together, accounting for their correlations, the difference between the average male and female personality profiles was large (Mahalanobis’ D = 1.49).
Rob Sica retweeted
New Substack
The disagreement over Direct Instruction may not be about what works, but about what we want school to be.
dtwuva.substack.com/p/the-de…































