@0xTrackmindi
iAccount based inEurope!
About this account
- Account based in
- Europe
- Connected via
- North America App Store
! X says this location may be affected by a proxy or VPN.
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
ai & onchain research | dms open...
Joined June 2023
- Tweets2.1K
- Following124
- Followers3.8K
- Likes10.4K
this Stanford paper is f*cking insane
it's about as close to a real HFT desk as I've ever seen go public.
14 pages, top-tier signal combination, a full statistical framework.
the same framework I broke down in 11 steps in the article below: serial demeaning, cross-sectional normalization, residual weighting, empirical Kelly.
the crazy part is most people call the market direction right and still lose money, simply because they never ran into these 14 pages.
read the paper first, then read the article.
bookmark it before this thread gets buried.
Trackmind retweeted
this quant paper is f*cking insane
it's basically the 12-step checklist hedge funds run through before they ever pull the trigger on a trade.
every step, every formula, full Python code, all of it laid out.
drop it into Claude and you'll have a working trading system by tonight.
the crazy part is most people are trading blind while this entire framework has been sitting out in the open the whole time.
full breakdown in the article below.
bookmark it before this thread gets buried.
this quant paper is f*cking insane
it's basically the 12-step checklist hedge funds run through before they ever pull the trigger on a trade.
every step, every formula, full Python code, all of it laid out.
drop it into Claude and you'll have a working trading system by tonight.
the crazy part is most people are trading blind while this entire framework has been sitting out in the open the whole time.
full breakdown in the article below.
bookmark it before this thread gets buried.
I STILL CANNOT F**KING UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE ARE NOT USING THIS AI STACK
Grok Bot finds the opportunities.
The agents do everything in between.
And somehow this setup is generating $11,000+ a month.
Here's the workflow:
1. Scout finds stories and formats already getting attention.
2. Scriptwriter turns them into short-form scripts.
3. Art Director decides what every shot should look like.
4. Producer generates the visuals with Picsart.
5. AI adds voice + captions.
6. Auditor reviews the finished videos and kills anything that feels repetitive.
7. Publisher sends the survivors to Shorts, TikTok and Reels.
8. Analyst reads the numbers and tells the system what to stop doing.
The crazy part isn't the generation.
It's the filtering.
42 videos made every week.
30 published.
12 killed.
The system would rather destroy a bad video than waste distribution on it.
That's why this works without:
filming
a camera
an editor
a face
I spend roughly 2 hours a week touching the system.
$11,000+ a month from a stack that most people could probably build with the same tools sitting in front of them.
The tools aren't the moat.
The workflow is.
I mapped the entire thing - agents, prompts, setup, costs and the exact production flow.
I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE ARE PAYING EDITORS $500+ FOR THIS
my entire setup runs without a camera, editor or filming.
here's the workflow:
→ grok finds formats already pulling millions of views
→ i strip the video down to its structure
→ rebuild it around a completely different topic
→ generate the visuals
→ AI voice + captions
→ publish everywhere
→ kill anything that doesn't hold attention
the trick isn't making AI videos.
it's finding a format that already proved it works.
one format can become 20 completely different videos without copying the original.
that's where it gets stupid.
no camera.
no editor.
no filming.
no face.
i use @Picsart for the visual generation because it removes the most time-consuming part.
the exact prompts + workflow are here ↓
Trackmind retweeted
this paper is f*cking insane
a quant paper combined a Hidden Markov Model with reinforcement learning to shift portfolio allocation on the fly as market regimes change.
the numbers: it beat SPY on risk-adjusted returns, with shallower drawdowns across 2004-2025.
the crazy part is it's not trying to forecast the market at all, it figures out what regime it's in first, then decides the allocation from there.
bookmark it before this thread gets buried.
this paper is f*cking insane
a quant paper combined a Hidden Markov Model with reinforcement learning to shift portfolio allocation on the fly as market regimes change.
the numbers: it beat SPY on risk-adjusted returns, with shallower drawdowns across 2004-2025.
the crazy part is it's not trying to forecast the market at all, it figures out what regime it's in first, then decides the allocation from there.
bookmark it before this thread gets buried.
Trackmind retweeted
this quant paper is f*cking insane
it's a 51-page guide from an MIT Sloan Business Club member covering probability, stats, market making, and real interview questions from Jane Street, Citadel, Two Sigma and more, all for free.
the crazy part is no professor put this together, it started as one student's own interview prep notes before it turned into a full guide to help others break into quant finance.
bookmark it before it disappears.
this quant paper is f*cking insane
it's a 51-page guide from an MIT Sloan Business Club member covering probability, stats, market making, and real interview questions from Jane Street, Citadel, Two Sigma and more, all for free.
the crazy part is no professor put this together, it started as one student's own interview prep notes before it turned into a full guide to help others break into quant finance.
bookmark it before it disappears.
Trackmind retweeted
this Stanford paper is f*cking insane
they just compressed the entire hedge fund playbook into a 17-page pdf.
Stanford put out the complete Hidden Markov Model framework that quants at firms like Jane Street and Two Sigma are known to run, and released it for free.
the crazy part is this isn't some watered-down summary, it's the actual mechanics behind models these desks keep locked up internally.
most people assume this stuff never leaves institutional walls.
this one hands you the framework directly, no gatekeeping.
bookmark it and read before someone takes it down.
this Stanford paper is f*cking insane
they just compressed the entire hedge fund playbook into a 17-page pdf.
Stanford put out the complete Hidden Markov Model framework that quants at firms like Jane Street and Two Sigma are known to run, and released it for free.
the crazy part is this isn't some watered-down summary, it's the actual mechanics behind models these desks keep locked up internally.
most people assume this stuff never leaves institutional walls.
this one hands you the framework directly, no gatekeeping.
bookmark it and read before someone takes it down.
Trackmind retweeted
this quant paper is f*cking insane
a former Morgan Stanley quant who went on to launch his own hedge fund just put the whole thing out there for free.
224 pages, and it's not theory, it's the actual winning algo strategies with every line of code included.
the crazy part is stuff this detailed almost never makes it past a fund's walls, let alone gets released to the public.
if quant trading has been on your radar but you didn't know where to start, this is the entry point.
bookmark it now before it disappears.
this quant paper is f*cking insane
a former Morgan Stanley quant who went on to launch his own hedge fund just put the whole thing out there for free.
224 pages, and it's not theory, it's the actual winning algo strategies with every line of code included.
the crazy part is stuff this detailed almost never makes it past a fund's walls, let alone gets released to the public.
if quant trading has been on your radar but you didn't know where to start, this is the entry point.
bookmark it now before it disappears.
this Anthropic paper is f*cking insane
it's a 13-page breakdown of 5 memory layers that cut token costs by 90% and make an agent actually learn.
1. WORKING MEMORY: what it sees now
the context window, everything the agent has in front of it right now.
when it fills up, old context gets lost. most agents live here, then we wonder why they keep failing.
2. EPISODIC MEMORY: what happened
the full history of interactions, with dates and times.
the agent remembers the deployment broke Tuesday at 3am because of a typo in the migration script. you never explain it twice.
3. SEMANTIC MEMORY: what it knows
facts, entities, and relationships stored in a knowledge graph.
"the user prefers TypeScript" lives here, and it doesn't vanish when the session ends.
4. PROCEDURAL MEMORY: how to do things
the agent tries 3 approaches, one works.
that method becomes a reusable skill. next time it goes straight to what worked.
5. FORGETTING: what it should erase
an agent that never forgets ends up stacking contradictions.
old preferences override the new ones. you move cities and it's still recommending restaurants from where you used to live.
remembering matters. knowing what to forget matters just as much.
the result?
→ Mem0 dropped from 26,000 tokens per query to 1,800
→ Snowflake added an ontology layer and got 20% more accuracy with 39% fewer tool calls
memory pays for itself from day one.
this 13-page pdf is the difference between a chatbot and an agent that actually learns.
don't skip it ↓
this paper is f*cking insane
Chinese researchers just published one with a brutal title: "The End of Software Engineering."
their argument: in traditional software, code carries pre-written human logic. in agentic software, the AI agent is the software, code just gets generated, run, and thrown away on the fly by an LLM reasoning loop.
they map it out in three eras: on-prem software you install, then SaaS hosted in the cloud, now Agent-as-a-Service.
the crazy part is what actually gets transferred this time. the first shifts moved complexity off the user's plate. this one transfers the decision-making itself.
human devs can only hold so much state in their head before things break. LLM agents don't just code faster, they handle architectural complexity that scales past what a person can track.
so the job flips: you stop writing implementation line by line and start setting goals, designing how agents coordinate, and auditing what they produce.
bookmark this before it gets buried.
this is f*cking insane
10 agent skills, 613k+ combined stars, and together they replace half your dev team
guardrails. lifecycle. discovery. model internals. orchestration. security. doc parsing. pdf handling. format glue. saas hooks
01 andrej-karpathy-skills
> github.com/multica-ai/andrej…
02 agent-skills
> github.com/addyosmani/agent-…
03 everything-claude-code
> github.com/affaan-m/everythi…
04 awesome-claude-skills
> github.com/ComposioHQ/awesom…
05 nanochat
> github.com/karpathy/nanochat
06 awesome-openclaw-skills
> github.com/VoltAgent/awesome…
07 skillkit
> github.com/rohitg00/skillkit
08 anydoc
> github.com/firecrawl/anydoc
09 pdf-inspector
> github.com/firecrawl/pdf-ins…
10 bumblebee
> github.com/perplexityai/bumb…
the real loop looks like this:
break down how it works ⮕ get hands-on with the mechanics ⮕ dig through real examples ⮕ ship something ⮕ test what breaks ⮕ point it at an actual problem ⮕ start over smarter
save this, then pick your first skill to install ⭣
GPT-6 Astra can build you a trading strategy in 10 minutes
and that is exactly why most people will lose money with it.
because a strategy is easy.
a strategy that survives reality is not.
most AI trading systems look incredible until you add:
- fees
- slippage
- delayed entries
- regime shifts
- hidden beta
- drawdown risk
then the "edge" disappears.
i use GPT-6 Astra for the opposite job.
not to generate more trades.
to attack every trade idea before it gets my capital.
if the setup survives friction, it moves forward.
if it breaks, Astra kills it.
a backtest with perfect fills is not a strategy.
it is a screenshot.
GPT-6 Astra does not make me more bullish.
it makes me reject bad trades
before they cost me money.
Trackmind retweeted
GPT-6 Astra just killed the biggest advantage hedge funds had
research teams.
i built a one-person quant research desk that scans markets 24/7, tests trading ideas, and filters out weak setups before they touch capital.
the full paper breaks down the system:
1. 4 places where markets repeatedly misprice risk
relative-value spreads, factor dislocations, volatility anomalies, and event-driven moves
2. the Astra research loop
it turns a market anomaly into a testable hypothesis, writes the first backtest, then tries to break its own result
3. the rejection engine
most strategies look good before you add fees, slippage, execution delay, and regime shifts
Astra kills them before they become expensive
4. the signal score
every setup is ranked by expected edge after costs, stability across regimes, and hidden factor exposure
5. the human risk gate
the AI does not get permission to trade
it sends the setup, the logic, the downside, and the invalidation level
you make the final call
while most traders ask AI:
“what should i buy?”
the real edge is making it reject 99 bad trades before you see them.
this is how a one-person hedge fund gets built with GPT-6 Astra: