Pranav Reddy

Gemini 4 Pro (in arena) vs Claude Opus 5.5 on a 3D floatplane physics simulation >Gemini 4 pro is completely outperforms Claude opus 5.5 here > When it officially drops, it’s going to raise the bar completely.

Claude models Performance vs Pricing recap >Opus 5.5 :Best for complex, high-reasoning tasks. (Expensive; use with caution) >Sonnet 5.5 :Fast and efficient. (Ideal for everyday tasks)

Kimi K3.1 vs. Qwen 4 checkpoint in Arena vs. DeepseV4.1 flash-1017 >Kimi tops China's AI and will stay at the top for quite some time now. >My prediction: After the official drop of Qwen 4, it is still behind Kimi K3.1.

OpenAI has GPT-6 Astra Anthropic has Claude Opus 5.5 Google has Gemini 4 Argon xAI has Grok 4.7 Moonshot AI has Kimi K3.1 DeepSeek has DeepSeek V4.1 Flash-1017 Alibaba has Qwen 3.8 I have a Random Forest trained on the Iris dataset.

Qwen 4 currently being tested on Arena again under the codename Kalmia >This is the output I got from a Three.js test of a running horse.

Anthropic just renamed the plans: Max 5x → Max
Max 20x → Ultra And removed the 5-hour limit for Ultra. >pro user me still waiting for Sunday 5 pm to reset

Gemini 4 Carbon Checkpoint in Arena vs. Claude Opus 5.5 >Carbon is really strong competition for Opus 5.5 >Really excited to see Fable 5.5 beat both

Upcoming Claude Fable 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon isn't like Ronaldo vs Messi. It's more like Ronaldo vs Neymar Jr.

Gemini 4 Carbon in Arena under the name gemini-4-argon-high. >Carbon’s outputs are too good >Google, please make Carbon publicly accessible

Gemini 4 Carbon is currently being tested on Arena under the Gemini-4-Argon-High identifier. >The new checkpoint is a clear upgrade over standard Argon >I’ve already gotten a few incredible outputs that easily beat it.

>Gemini 4 Xenon is rumored to outclass unreleased rivals like Fable 5.5. >Leaks say it “maxes out” nearly every public and private benchmark thanks to RSI. >It’s also said to understand messages and human culture much better.

Gemini 4 Xenon is an unverified rumored codename for a potential next Gemini 4 model (after the official Argon and Carbon releases).

Claude Fable 5.5 (routed) vs. Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon >Fable 5.5 clears Opus 5.5 on the Three.js test. >Anthropic, please drop this beast as soon as possible!

This is the best output I got from the Claude Fable 5.5 checkpoint on the zebra galloping. >Fable 5.5 is really very impressive. >Anthropic pls drop it as soon as possible

Fable 5.5 > Gemini 4 Carbon >~ Opus 5.5 > Gemini 4 Argon >Speed and cost wise, the order will definitely change.

Anthropic with Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.5 Google with Argon and Carbon OpenAI with GPT-6 Astra Meanwhile, SpaceXAI Grok:

This is my prediction: performance-wise, Gemini 4 Carbon will rank below Claude Fable 5.5 but above Gemini 4 Argon, matching Opus 5.5.

Agent Arena update: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) ranks #2 with +16.2% net improvement. >Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) remains #1 at +21.1%. >Strong showing across real agentic workflows.

Gemini 4 Carbon just took #2 on Agent Arena.

Gemini 4 Carbon checkpoint in Arena vs. Gemini 4 Argon: Bentley convertible driving through sunset >Carbon takes a clear lead here >Once it officially drops, Opus 5.5 is in serious trouble.

Gemini 4 Carbon’s output when it featured in Arena a few days ago under the name gemini 4 argon. >Bentley convertible driving on a highway at sunset, side view.