Woke Reich Putlerite
Paris, France
Joined August 2014
- Tweets8.3K
- Following534
- Followers1.1K
- Likes29.3K
POOL2pro retweeted
Sounds like something one would say right before they dissolve parliament, knowing full well how loud the British press will kvetch about it. There was no love for Cromwell in the Third Reich. Dr. Robert Ley called Churchill and Roosevelt “Cromwell’s hypocritical successors.”
Hitler was once asked his favorite historical figure during a New York Times interview, Hitler said the following:
"What character in history do you admire most, Caesar, Napoleon or Frederick the Great?"
The Chancellor shook his head.
"No, I admire Oliver Cromwell. I do not think the Commoner the greatest man that ever lived, but he saved England in a crisis similar to ours and saved it by obliterating Parliament and uniting the nation."
- Adolf Hitler, interview with Anne O'Hare McCormick for The New York Times. July 9, 1933
Sounds like something one would say right before they dissolve parliament, knowing full well how loud the British press will kvetch about it. There was no love for Cromwell in the Third Reich. Dr. Robert Ley called Churchill and Roosevelt “Cromwell’s hypocritical successors.”
Hitler was once asked his favorite historical figure during a New York Times interview, Hitler said the following:
"What character in history do you admire most, Caesar, Napoleon or Frederick the Great?"
The Chancellor shook his head.
"No, I admire Oliver Cromwell. I do not think the Commoner the greatest man that ever lived, but he saved England in a crisis similar to ours and saved it by obliterating Parliament and uniting the nation."
- Adolf Hitler, interview with Anne O'Hare McCormick for The New York Times. July 9, 1933
After using statistics from German OKW reports and Allied own reports, the closest estimate is that from D day to the end of April of 1945, Allies in western Europe suffered nearly 900000 combat casualties in exchange for 1500000-1600000 German combat losses including lots of German POWs captured at Falaise, Rhineland, and Ruhr. In Italy from Sicily landing to the end of April 1945, Allies suffered 350000 combat losses in exchange for roughly the same amount of German losses. These only counted formal soldiers and officers on both sides, so Volkssturm, Todt and RAD labor, police, gestapo, Hitlerjugend, BDM, and other para-military or non-military units serving the Third Reich shouldn't be counted. Allied claims about captured POWs included them so it's totally unreliable and outrageously exaggerated to make you bellieve that western Allies captured millions on the western front.
Besides, these losses I just mentioned were resulted in situations whereas the Allies had nearly 3 times as many men, total air superiority, far more fuels, and nearly ten to over 20 times as many ammunition as Germans due to German transportation crippled by Allied air forces.
In reality, study from Dupuy institute, words from military historians, and accounts from Allied commanders like Eisenhower, Patton, and Montgomery showed that 100 Germans could match 120-160 Americans and British in combat in 1944, and Germans fought better than Americans even in early 1945 in the battle of the Bulge.
Nevertheless, it's undeniable that the western Allies had better fighting quality than the Japanese(earlier Allied defeats due to lack of air and naval superiority and using poor quality colonial troops, later bloodbaths like Peleliu and Iwo Jima due to solid underground tunnel defense networks on islands offsetting Allied firepower advantage. Still overall exchange ratio highly favored the Americans and British in the far east) and Soviets(poor exchange ratios throughout the war though possessing numerical superiority).
POOL2pro retweeted
AI slop. Hitler was Catholic and any negative quotes about Christianity attributed to him are totally made up or taken wildly out of context. Hitler carried a whip early on as a symbol for the whip that Christ used when he threw the money changers out of the temple.
Franco made the Führer wait.
October 23, 1940, Hendaye station. Hitler’s train sat on the Spanish-French border while Franco’s was still rolling.
When the Caudillo finally arrived, the most powerful man in Europe had already been left cooling his heels. The meeting that followed dragged on for nine hours of circular demands, territorial shopping lists, & polite obstruction.
Hitler wanted Spain in the war, Gibraltar, the Mediterranean, a southern flank against Britain. Franco wanted grain, oil, French North Africa, & time. He got the last of those.
On paper Franco was prepared to honor the war. He had accepted Axis aid during the Civil War, shared anti-communist rhetoric, & kept the door open. In practice he treated the alliance as a transaction he had no intention of completing on Hitler’s terms.
Spain was exhausted, its army thin, its ports vulnerable. Joining would have been suicide dressed as gratitude.
What made the stall personal, not merely strategic, was the deeper contempt. Franco was a devout Catholic who had built his regime on the Church.
Hitler’s private remarks about Christianity, his open scorn for its “Jewish” origins, its universalism, its refusal to kneel to race, were known in Madrid.
Franco had no interest in subordinating Catholic Spain to a movement that treated the faith as an obstacle or a temporary tool.
The waiting, the endless conditions, the refusal to commit: these were not only military prudence. They were the behavior of a man who disliked the person across the table & saw no reason to hurry into his war.
Hitler left furious. He later said he would rather have several teeth pulled than negotiate with Franco again. Spain stayed out. Gibraltar stayed British.
The meeting at Hendaye remains one of the cleaner examples of a weaker power using delay, faith, & national interest to refuse a stronger one, without ever quite saying no.
AI slop. Hitler was Catholic and any negative quotes about Christianity attributed to him are totally made up or taken wildly out of context. Hitler carried a whip early on as a symbol for the whip that Christ used when he threw the money changers out of the temple.
Franco made the Führer wait.
October 23, 1940, Hendaye station. Hitler’s train sat on the Spanish-French border while Franco’s was still rolling.
When the Caudillo finally arrived, the most powerful man in Europe had already been left cooling his heels. The meeting that followed dragged on for nine hours of circular demands, territorial shopping lists, & polite obstruction.
Hitler wanted Spain in the war, Gibraltar, the Mediterranean, a southern flank against Britain. Franco wanted grain, oil, French North Africa, & time. He got the last of those.
On paper Franco was prepared to honor the war. He had accepted Axis aid during the Civil War, shared anti-communist rhetoric, & kept the door open. In practice he treated the alliance as a transaction he had no intention of completing on Hitler’s terms.
Spain was exhausted, its army thin, its ports vulnerable. Joining would have been suicide dressed as gratitude.
What made the stall personal, not merely strategic, was the deeper contempt. Franco was a devout Catholic who had built his regime on the Church.
Hitler’s private remarks about Christianity, his open scorn for its “Jewish” origins, its universalism, its refusal to kneel to race, were known in Madrid.
Franco had no interest in subordinating Catholic Spain to a movement that treated the faith as an obstacle or a temporary tool.
The waiting, the endless conditions, the refusal to commit: these were not only military prudence. They were the behavior of a man who disliked the person across the table & saw no reason to hurry into his war.
Hitler left furious. He later said he would rather have several teeth pulled than negotiate with Franco again. Spain stayed out. Gibraltar stayed British.
The meeting at Hendaye remains one of the cleaner examples of a weaker power using delay, faith, & national interest to refuse a stronger one, without ever quite saying no.
“No one is doing anything! The liberal idea presupposes that nothing needs to be done [about the flow of migrants]. Migrants can kill, plunder and rape with impunity because their rights as migrants must be protected. WHAT RIGHTS!? Every crime must have its punishment.”
Evidence suggest Nicholas II never abdicated, and that it’s all a Bolshevik conspiracy. It’s comical that so few people understand just how closely the US/Britain were working with the Bolsheviks. Anything the Bolsheviks said was eaten up by the Western press and taken as gospel.
Nicholas II didn’t simply give up his throne. His own chief of staff rallied Russia’s top generals to pressure him into abdicating. And it wasn't as if nobody had planned to remove him.
Alexander Guchkov, a leading opposition politician, later openly admitted that he and his allies had been plotting a coup since late 1916. Their plan was to intercept the tsar’s train, force him to abdicate, and arrest his government. But something similar did happen.
That plan never materialized. But when the February Revolution broke out, events moved fast. Opposition leader Pavel Milyukov made the choice clear: Nicholas would either abdicate or be overthrown. General Mikhail Alekseyev contacted the army’s front commanders, urging them to back the Tsar’s abdication. They agreed, and Alekseyev forwarded their responses to Nicholas.
Meanwhile, the capital was in revolt, Duma leaders were already taking power, and Nicholas couldn’t even get home to his family outside Petrograd. His train had been turned back.
Just think about it. The Tsar had lost control of his capital, his own generals were telling him to go, and there was hardly anyone left he could count on. On March 2, 1917, Nicholas signed his abdication aboard his train in Pskov.
History calls it an abdication. But with his own military commanders pushing him out, how much of a choice did he really have? And how different was that from a coup?
Garbage zionist propaganda film that makes no mention of the jewish partisan bandits in Belarus who massacred and terrorized the local peasant population for peacefully cooperating with the Germans. All murderous jewish partisan activity was blamed on the Nazis of course.
The reason jewish victimhood isn’t emphasized in the “Great Patriotic War” narrative is because it would have proven Hitler and Goebbel’s propaganda to be true and correct; that Hitler was at war with judeo Bolshevism, not the Russian people or Slavs.
POOL2pro retweeted
When the judeo-Atlanticist “powers” feel threatened by the economic and military might of a continental power, they colonize and arm and brainwash the neighbors around you to become hostile towards you. Naturally this situation becomes untenable and war becomes unavoidable.
🚨🚨 Tucker Carlson insists three times that Hitler "did not want to go to war with the UK," and twice demands that Jacob Rees-Mogg "acknowledge" it.
Hitler "didn't want war" with Britain the way a mugger doesn't want a fight with his victim. He wanted Britain to stand aside while he took Europe.
Britain publicly guaranteed Poland's independence in March 1939. Hitler invaded Poland anyway.
Rees-Mogg: "I'm very surprised you're verging on defending Hitler."
Carlson sarcastically remarks that he is a secret Nazi, then clarifies that he is neither a secret Nazi nor a public Nazi.
When the judeo-Atlanticist “powers” feel threatened by the economic and military might of a continental power, they colonize and arm and brainwash the neighbors around you to become hostile towards you. Naturally this situation becomes untenable and war becomes unavoidable.
🚨🚨 Tucker Carlson insists three times that Hitler "did not want to go to war with the UK," and twice demands that Jacob Rees-Mogg "acknowledge" it.
Hitler "didn't want war" with Britain the way a mugger doesn't want a fight with his victim. He wanted Britain to stand aside while he took Europe.
Britain publicly guaranteed Poland's independence in March 1939. Hitler invaded Poland anyway.
Rees-Mogg: "I'm very surprised you're verging on defending Hitler."
Carlson sarcastically remarks that he is a secret Nazi, then clarifies that he is neither a secret Nazi nor a public Nazi.
Yes it’s called ideological consistency. Anything besides National Socialism is inherently schizophrenic and constantly at risk of being co-opted by jews due to endless blind spots.
Find an Assadist who isn’t a Nazi or a pedo
(challenge: impossible )
nitter.cf/doomernat22/status/210…
My persistence has converted Mr. Dugin into an enlightened national socialist.
