@Apocaron
Account based inEurope
About this account
- Account based in
- Europe
- Connected via
- Europe Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
😂 This is a very funny video - a compilation of the funniest moments from the World Humanoid Robot Games 2026, China ...
youtube.com/watch?v=pnz79EmT…
Bitcoin has had, and will continue to have +/-20% corrections in the cycle - many of them.
This is standard and expected behavior for this asset.
Nobody should be surprised, but of course, many will be...
Bitcoin - the probability of a retracement is low (but always possible ofc).
These two bottoms and their shapes measured on 2W candles are very similar:
The humanoid Olympics are back: 2,056 robots, five days of racing, fighting, football—and actual work. 🤖🏅
The 2nd World Humanoid Robot Games just opened in Beijing: 666 teams from 16 countries, competing across 51 events. Last year had just 26.
The speed jump is already ridiculous. Robots are now running the 100 m in the low-9-second range, while Tien Kung Ultra reached 2.88 m in the standing high jump.
But the viral sports clips aren’t what I’m watching most.
This year, autonomy matters a lot more. The 400 m, 1,500 m and relays are fully autonomous, while the 21 scenario events test robots on factory work, rescue, household tasks and dexterous manipulation. Teleoperated runs only get 0.5× scoring weight.
That’s the part that makes this year much more interesting than 2025. Fast running gets attention. Staying autonomous through long, messy, real-world tasks tells us much more about which robots are actually getting closer to real deployment.
WRC 2026 isn’t even over yet, and the 2026 World Humanoid Robot Games are already here.
This is the opening ceremony rehearsal, with a formation of Tien Kung robots marching straight toward me as delegation after delegation files in behind them.
Honestly, watching rows of humanoids march into the arena like this feels like a robot version of the Olympic opening ceremony.
The price of $SPCX still controlled by basic VWAP regardless of where you start it, from the IPO or the top...
$TSLA lost 75% during its best years of car sales, and people think that aggressively valued $SPCX has bottomed.
Interesting.
The value of $SPCX is virtual - like it was in case of $TSLA thanks to FSD.
For perspective:
FSD was promised 13 years ago, and it still has not been delivered - it is still not safe enough for mass adoption.
The important reality is that FSD is much easier and cheaper to achieve than humanoid robots or a mission to Mars.
The map of " Quantum computers are going to destroy Bitcoin " FUD in 2024, 2025, and 2026.
Are these quantum computers still in the room with us?
Apocaron ⚡ retweeted
This is current state of Optimus vs Chinese robots....
Optimus in red color, Chinese in white (if somebody did not noticed)
And some people still think #BREXIT was a good idea…
Only the #undereducated think that.
If you want to educate yourself, read "The legend of Svatopluk's three wands" or "Three Twigs of King Svatopluk".
Pakistanis petrol bombing each others weddings in England's second largest city, Birmingham in broad daylight.
Of course the legacy media and politicians turn a blind eye.
An Englishman got over 3 years in prison for throwing a wheelie bin a few months ago.
Two-tier policing and judiciary across the land.
But they said "Bitcoin is dead"...
Bitcoin is bullish on the 1D, 2D, 3D, and weekly timeframes. The only question is how high it will go once the building pressure is released. $IBIT
Bitcoin is bullish on the 1D, 2D, 3D, and weekly timeframes. The only question is how high it will go once the building pressure is released. $IBIT
How good is the weekly RSI oversold territory as a predictor for Bitcoin cycle bottoms?
observations:
- in every previous major cycle, the weekly RSI dropped into oversold territory only once
- in every cycle it marked the bottom range
- in every cycle, the price remained below that week's opening price no longer than 280 days (2x ~100 days, 2x ~280 days)
- in every cycle, once this window concluded, the price never again revisited the price of the week Bitcoin entered the oversold territory (2023 - oscillation around that price, slightly below, but not significantly, IMHO)
- today we are 140 days into this range
$STRC: strong V-shaped recovery.
Selling $STRC on that nonsensical short term wick was one of the worst decisions I have seen in the stock market in years.
After all the nonsensical FUD about "quantum computers that do not even exist are going to destroying Bitcoin in the future" and " $MSTR going to zero" the most important question remains:
Did investors learn something?
For example DO NOT SELL in panic?!
$TSLA lost 75% during its best years of car sales, and people think that aggressively valued $SPCX has bottomed.
Interesting.
The value of $SPCX is virtual - like it was in case of $TSLA thanks to FSD.
For perspective:
FSD was promised 13 years ago, and it still has not been delivered - it is still not safe enough for mass adoption.
The important reality is that FSD is much easier and cheaper to achieve than humanoid robots or a mission to Mars.
This is still true for Bitcoin...
2026 - $57 735
2024 - $49 577
2023 - $19 569
2022 - $15 479
2020 - $3 850
2018 - $3 122
2015 - $152
2013 - $63
2011 - $2
People who bought Bitcoin for the first time through $IBIT or other ETFs - and then sold - will learn an lesson in the coming cycle: never sell your Bitcoin at the bottom just because everything looks scary.
That is how Bitcoin HODLers and Bitcoin maximalists are made in every cycle. And that's why Bitcoin keeps going up forever, Laura.
Don't measure the tops - your focus should be bottoms!
People who bought Bitcoin for the first time through $IBIT or other ETFs - and then sold - will learn an lesson in the coming cycle: never sell your Bitcoin at the bottom just because everything looks scary.
That is how Bitcoin HODLers and Bitcoin maximalists are made in every cycle. And that's why Bitcoin keeps going up forever, Laura.
Don't measure the tops - your focus should be bottoms!
In the old days, people believed in gods and magic, while everything was governed by physics and the laws of nature.
Today, people believe in influencers, CEOs, and "analysts", while markets are driven by liquidity created by international monetary contracts and algos.
The law: The speed of liquidity moves first. Price follows. Then analysts and influencers invent narratives AFTER moves already happened.
Finally humans argue over why Bitcoin went down and who is to blame, when much of the move was simply driven by international debt contracts reaching repayment dates and algorithms reacting to speed of liquidity and liquidity itself.
That is the modern "magic".
Contract expiration dates define the waves.
The speed of liquidity (not liquidity itself) defines the start and end of bull runs.
Human FOMO appears and overshoots to extreme tops - analysts explain this as "Bitcoin is driven by attention" and it truly is, like everything else, but only for a short period.
You don't believe me? Good! Study these charts and try to explain them.
What do you see? Human behavior or mathematics, contract terms, and expiration dates?
On screenshots: Last cycle and current cycle on $MSTR - they are "identical". The same show, just different players:
1. the same TOPs - the "same" time since Bitcoin halving
2. the "same" H&S structure at the "same" time
3. the "same" retest of the resistence line
4. the "same" ~455 days between the TOP and huge red weekly candle
5. the "same" "3" major collapse events at the "same" time (Terra Luna, Celsius, FTX vs Quantum FUD, $STRC "collapse", and ... maybe something else?)
Human attention is not that organized. Contracts, elections, and algos are. Human attention is not the main driver. It is only the amplifier that helps overshoot both the tops and the bottoms.
