Ash (@AshleySCHowes) header
Ash (@AshleySCHowes) profile picture

Civilization; geopolitics; post-materialism; contemplative traditions; haiku. Kaleidoscopically shifting perspectives. (Bad manners blocked; no DMs)

Mexico
Joined May 2024
Photo by Ash (@AshleySCHowes)Photo by Ash (@AshleySCHowes)Photo by Ash (@AshleySCHowes)Photo by Ash (@AshleySCHowes)Photo by Ash (@AshleySCHowes)Photo by Ash (@AshleySCHowes)Photo by Ash (@AshleySCHowes)Photo by Ash (@AshleySCHowes)Photo by Ash (@AshleySCHowes)
Quote often attributed to Jefferson but actually by Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu from his 'Spirit of the Laws' 1748. A wise insight. Thomas Jefferson transcribed it into his Commonplace Book during his early legal studies (circa 1760s–1770s).
6
30
1
80
8,841
This Irish farmer hilariously sums up the entire world’s problems. “Why we bes bend over…” My man!
420
4,249
399
18,610
796,946
Things people aren't realizing: Most SILVER mining is a byproduct of copper and zinc mining. There's almost no silver mining that happens on purpose as a primary target. Copper and zinc mines use SULFURIC ACID to strip those elements out of raw ore. (The acid dissolves the metals into solution, where they can be poured off, living the raw ore behind, essentially.) The war on Iran has collapsed the world's sulfur flows out of the Persian Gulf. Without sulfur, copper and zinc mining nearly collapse. Without copper and zinc mining, silver production plummets (obviously). This is where we are right now in late 2026. The main reason silver isn't exploding in price right now is because the same war that impedes sulfur flows is also impeding the energy flows used by manufacturing industries that demand silver as an input. (Simplified explanation, but largely valid.) Plus, of course, paper manipulation of silver markets by governments / central banks. When industry does come back online at full speed, sooner or later, the above-ground silver supply will be drastically thin. What do you suppose will happen to silver prices at that time? Almost nobody realizes that silver production depends on sulfur shipments out of the Persian Gulf. Now you know.
100
475
26
2,711
86,685
"Excellence is never an accident. It is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, and intelligent execution." - Aristotle
46
675
46
3,145
49,034
ha ha ha!
They are as independent as a crack whore living in their parent’s basement.
18
"greatest strategic blunders"? No, it was not a blunder. A blunder would imply that they didn't understand going in what the outcome would be...that's where most ppl get this wrong. Normal ppl would see the potential of WW3, killing a million ppl, overthrowing an elected leader which results in a civil war as a bad thing. The international syndicate that has been doing this since WW2 doesn't view any of those outcomes as bad, as a matter of fact, they've been actively achieving them for 70 yrs. You would look at assassinating JFK and getting the US into Vietnam as a blunder. IT WAS THE PURPOSE OF DOING IT. You would look at assassinating Lumumba and the murder of over a million Congolese a blunder. IT WAS THE PURPOSE OF DOING IT. NATO needed an excuse to to attack Russia. They overthrew Ukraine, provoked a civil war between the Donbas (ethnic Russians) and the Nazis of Azov and Right Sector with the intention of provoking a response from Russian...stage a false flag against a NATO country and presto, we're off to war again. If you can't see the historical pattern at this point, I can't help you.
🚨 "Had there been no movement to bring Ukraine into NATO, Ukraine would be intact today. That is why I argue that bringing Ukraine into NATO was one of the greatest strategic blunders in modern history. Because not only is it leading to the destruction of Ukraine, not only did it lead to this devastating war, but you're going to have poisonous relations between the Europeans and the Americans and the Ukrainians on one side and the Russians on the other side for as far as the eye can see. ," comments Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science, John Mearsheimer, in our latest interview. ➤ Watch the full podcast episode: youtu.be/VXPUw1yJM0A
38
283
25
679
10,423
One helluva quote. Thanks Giorgio!
Whoever cannot seek the unforeseen sees nothing, for the known way is an impasse. ~ Heraclitus
2
37
This suffering world ; The flowers will blossom Even at that. - Kobayashi Issa. ~ Autumn Flowers Hiramatsu Reiji
8
101
1
366
3,957
Tolkien was so wise
124
1,899
108
10,411
125,254
This guy shows how to rescue yourself if you fall through ice. [📹 rewildu]
172
3,564
196
31,553
4,130,927
James Burnham – The Trotskyist Who Saw How It Would End. He was a Trotskyist first. In the 1930s he was one of the leading Marxist intellectuals in America – building the movement, debating Trotsky himself by letter, believing in the revolution. But he was also an American. A practical mind, trained to look at what actually happens rather than what the theory promises. So he understood what it was really about – and explained to us how it would work out. 1. In 1940 he broke with Trotsky over one question: what was the Soviet Union? Trotsky said a workers’ state, temporarily deformed. Burnham looked at it and saw something else: a new ruling class. The workers owned nothing. The capitalists were gone. Someone else was in charge – the people who ran the machine. Trotsky spent much of his last year writing against him. Burnham was right. 2. In 1941 he generalized it in The Managerial Revolution. The future would belong neither to the capitalists nor to the workers, but to the managers – the administrators, technicians and bureaucrats who control things without owning them. Capitalism would fall, he wrote – but not to the working class. To the managers. The capitalist, who risks his own fortune, would be replaced by the manager, who risks nothing, owns nothing and runs everything. That is the whole difference. The capitalist pays for his own mistakes. The manager’s mistakes are always paid by someone else – the shareholder, the taxpayer, the citizen. Burnham saw the same class rising in Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany and New Deal America. Different flags, the same new masters. And he said what it meant: the end of capitalism and of freedom – even if the façade stayed standing. 3. Orwell read it, argued with it – and borrowed from it. The three superstates of 1984 come from Burnham. So does its ruling class, which owns everything collectively and nothing personally. 4. In 1943 came The Machiavellians. Burnham studied the realists – Machiavelli and his modern heirs, like Pareto – and drew the lesson idealists never want to hear: every society is run by an elite. The only question is whether there is more than one. Freedom does not come from the absence of elites. It comes from their competition – rival powers that check each other, a free press, an opposition that can actually win. A single elite with no rival is tyranny, whatever it calls itself. 5. Now look at what the long march actually produced. Not the rule of the workers. The rule of the managers – the administrators of the ministries, the regulators in Brussels, the HR departments, the editorial boards. The façade of capitalism still stands – but who actually rules? Corporate boards spending other people’s money on other people’s ideologies. Officials in Brussels. Directors of foundations and NGOs. No voter elected them. The revolution succeeded. Only the managers won it. Gramsci designed the march. Burnham told us who would be waiting at the end of it. A class that owns nothing, answers to no voter, pays for none of its mistakes, and runs almost everything. 6. In 1964 he wrote Suicide of the West. Its verdict: liberalism – the modern progressive kind, not the classical one – is "the ideology of Western suicide." It lets a civilization accept its own retreat and feel good about it. Every loss becomes a sign of progress. Sixty years later, it reads like a description of Brussels. 7. The ex-Trotskyist ended up a founding editor of National Review, and in 1983 Ronald Reagan gave him the Presidential Medal of Freedom. From Trotsky’s comrade to Reagan’s medal. He knew the left from the inside, and he had the American instinct to ask the only question that matters: not what the theory promises, but who ends up in charge. In 1941 his answer was the managers. It still is – unless a rival elite rises. For the first time in decades, one has: builders, not administrators. Burnham would have recognized the moment. Not a revolution – a rotation.
Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century. Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions. Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935. 1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first. 2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another. 3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own. 4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections. 5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked. 6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to. 7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march. Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.
64
738
80
1,978
89,128
American an European friends, I’m so ashamed, but you need to see what France has become. Don’t make the same mistakes we did. The only peaceful solution is to send them back to their countries of origin they love so much. We cannot coexist. It will be them, or us.
5,556
32,932
2,444
110,889
4,166,966
Interesting developments. Gold and silver becoming transactional money again in many US States. If this takes, the US truly will start to become 'Great Again'.
1
2
30
For those who may not realize it, most of the official Oct 7th story is, of course, BS. Two articles which help understand (& there are many others if you care to search):
1
42
From today: moonofalabama.org/2026/09/bi… From earlier about who/what is behind Hamas: swprs.org/why-israel-created…
15