Citizen of the U.S. where supposedly: "...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." -July, 4th. 1776
Midwest USA
Joined October 2022
- Tweets5.1K
- Following289
- Followers345
- Likes896
AudioPhool retweeted
no ambre, leftists do not care about others. if that were true, the left would not always be seeking dictatorial control.
what being a leftist really means is pretending to care about the world as a pretext to seize and wield power and get free stuff. it's not care, it's conquest.
this has always been what leftism is about and why it's an inherently destructive, intolerant ethos.
the fact of it is obvious: you never build the means of production, you seize it.
it's not charity, it's legal plunder taken at gunpoint.
every time you guys say "justice" the real meaning is "force."
it's your fundamental fraud and why you are anti-human and anti-progress.
consider:
nothing stops the left from engaging in voluntary collectivism. you could all get together and pool resources and labor, build enterprises, and care for the needy in your communities through your own choices and actions, but you don't because deep down, you know it's a lie and it would cost you instead of those you seek to plunder and coerce.
this is why you steal rather than create.
it's an army of takers masquerading as civilizers.
so give it a rest. there are only two types of leftists:
1. cynical, power-hungry wreckers who will burn the world and murder millions so long as they get to wear a spiffy uniform and live in a big house and boss people around
2. those too foolish and ignorant of history to know that they have been taken in by group 1
the first is a monster, the second a dupe drunk on the lie that submission to monsters is empathy.
and neither one makes the world better.
there is no ethos in the history of humanity that has done more harm and anyone who mistakes that for virtue is desperately unserious.
AudioPhool retweeted
🚨🚨 THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 🚨
I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it.
I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 - feel free to distribute.
Here's the primer:
USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG.
Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building.
You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.
Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself.
This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening.
In their own words:
"We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.
Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself.
DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members.
Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins.
The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings.
Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.
In the words of Reiff/DRG:
"So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan."
Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."
Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond.
The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape.
Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after.
Who decides when your government is legitimate?
In fact, "feelgoodism" is at the heart of how the Dem Leftists pick sides & formulate conclusions. Logical thought without empathy isn't good. But "feelgoodism" with zero thought as to 2nd., 3rd., 4th. etc results, is the root cause of all that's being seen & rued today!
🤖 Made with AI
🚨🚨by Yuri Bezmenov:
"BREAKING: NPR CEO Katherine Maher (she/her) Wins Harper’s First Amendment Award!"
NO...it's "NOT The Babylon Bee: Harper’s Magazine makes a mockery of free speech and itself by honoring a censorship commissar!"
substack.com/home/post/p-218…
AudioPhool retweeted
This video has over half a million views in the last 24 hours on my instagram
The price of free things is your freedom
AudioPhool retweeted
THERE IT IS 🚨 The FDA is admitting they have no idea what’s being used in our food
The FDA admits they have no idea about 10,000+ chemicals allowed into our foods introduced WITH NO SAFETY STUDIES because they were self approved by Big Food
“The real issue here is that the FDA commissioner, as we sit here today, does not know what's in our food. Most Americans, most moms would assume that the ingredients in our food have been subjected to safety studies. That is not true.
For the past 40 years, the food industry's taken advantage of a loophole where they can ‘Generally recognize a food as safe GRAS.’ And 95 % of food ingredients now in our food supply have been self-identified as safe with no safety studies.
Once you designate that loophole, you do not have to submit the ingredient or safety studies to the FDA and that loophole use has led to the FDA not knowing what's in our food. It could be 2,000 ingredients, it could be 10,000. We don't know. There is no safety study on food”
READ THAT AGAIN
The FDA is finally announcing GRAS Reform, “Generally recognized as safe.”
The Trump Admin is finally closing this loophole, this is a massive deal
This loophole has been exploited so bad that 98.7% of all food chemicals that entered the marketplace since 2000 were only reviewed and tested by the food and chemical companies that created them
No FDA studies, no safety studies. Just straight into our food
AudioPhool retweeted
“CRIMES OF NECESSITY”
🔥That’s the new progressive rebrand for THEFT.
A DSA socialist from Brooklyn just stood outside court and said people stealing toothpaste and soap have a “biological need” … so we shouldn’t punish them.
The real crime, according to her, is that CVS and Walgreens exist while poor people exist.
Nearly half the drugstores in NYC have already closed. Gangs are walking out with armfuls of product and flipping it online.
Working people can’t even buy damn soap without it being locked up.
And these lawmakers act like they’re doing the Lord’s work by protecting the “struggling” while the actual struggling get their neighborhood stores wiped out.
This is ideological rot dressed up as empathy … pushed by people who never had to choose between rent and groceries a day in their life.
🚨Stop romanticizing crime!!
So they can't decide what the "W" prefix in their sport's acronym means!?! Actually it's not funny, it's posturing to the Leftist Magic Kingdom, where whatever you dream can become reality, no matter who or what it harms -- & in this case, it's their players & sport.
"Iran has mistaken a tactical threat for a durable advantage."
Hormuz Miscalculation
Sec Bessent gets it.
Iran has mistaken a tactical threat for a durable advantage. By repeatedly signaling its willingness to disrupt the Strait of Hormuz, Tehran hasn’t strengthened its hand, it has accelerated the market’s exit.
Capital does not tolerate chokepoints; it routes around them.
Saudi Arabia is expanding its East-West pipeline. The UAE has already built out Fujairah as a bypass. Iraq is revisiting overland export corridors. Every marginal dollar now flows toward redundancy, not reliance. What was once a geopolitical lever is being engineered into irrelevance. Bessent gets it: markets don’t absorb coercion, they arbitrage it away
.
Energy markets are not static, and they are not sentimental. The shale revolution already diluted OPEC’s grip. LNG has globalized gas. Now infrastructure is doing the same to maritime risk. Once these pipelines are built, they don’t get unbuilt. Volume shifts become permanent. Pricing power follows.
Tehran’s miscalculation is classic: overplay a scarce asset, and the world invests to make it abundant. The more Iran rattles Hormuz, the faster it erodes the very leverage it seeks to exploit.
In the end, this is not deterrence. Its substitution and substitution, once funded, is irreversible. Iran is underwriting its own marginalization.
The US is the big winner. China the big loser.
Welcome to the new great game.
"The era of global warming has ended ... the era of global BOILING has arrived" said the UN Secretary General.🤣🤣🤣
When the the "sky-is-falling" analogies have ALL been used & the when lies can't get more egregious or farcical, the phrase "jumping the shark" comes to mind.
What MJTruthUltra said👇👇👇
My God… this is horrific 💔
🚨 Sister Recounts Horrifying Moment her Brother Wept as he was being prepped to have his Organs Harvested
Donna Rhorer— “TJ was crying on the operating table, his eyes were tracking me and they told me it was just reflexes— then during the heart cath, he was thrashing and crying, grabbing the doctors hands to stop him”… as they were preparing to harvest his organs after he had been FALSELY declared brain-dead.
TJ, who survived was present in the audience crying uncontrollably…
rumble.com/v7drxuu-sister-re…
Was this:
A) A Successful Darwin Award Attempt
B) Suicidal Empathy
C) Situational Irony
D) Getting what you desired, but not necessarily what you expected; although devastatingly sad, it was💯predictable, if human nature was considered (which it💯NEVER is by the Left)!
😆😅"Trust The Science"😂🤣
Ahhh...which scientist, your's, mine, your friend's, the local govt's, the State govt's, the Federal govt's, this Uni's expert, that Uni's expert, the WHO, the CDC...just who is the expert, when there are 10's of 1,000's who agree to disagree!!
"How do you even measure whether a government agency is doing a good job?" You can't, which doesn't take an MBA to discern. Because..."a business has profit and loss staring it in the face every single day, but government agencies have no prices, no profit, and no objective way to tell if they’re succeeding or failing." And exactly why they make sure they spend what they're allocated, so they can put their hands out for more 💰so they can continue to grow and do nothing productive, but spend your tax💰💰💰!!
111
Why does government only ever grow, no matter which party’s in charge?
Back in 1944, economist Ludwig von Mises asked the question that still makes bureaucrats squirm:
how do you even measure whether a government agency is doing a good job?
A business has profit and loss staring it in the face every single day, but government agencies have no prices, no profit, and no objective way to tell if they’re succeeding or failing.
So they replace it with rules. Endless procedures, red tape, and rigid process when there’s no market feedback to keep them honest.
Then William Niskanen came along in 1971 and made it even clearer that bureaucrats aren’t cartoon villains, but rational people responding to incentives. And their incentive is “bigger budgets equal more power”.
No profit motive to restrain them so every incentive in the system pushes them to grow.
That’s why it doesn’t matter who wins elections. The machine keeps expanding because that’s how it’s built.
Sure there’s corruption, but that’s only a symptom of the ever growing system working exactly as designed.
"The French Enlightenment and the Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment happened simultaneously, in the same century, reading the same books, arguing about the same questions." "They reached completely opposite conclusions." "One produced the Declaration of Independence and the American Constitution. The other produced the guillotine." "This is the most important civilizational fork in modern history."
--> Worthy of Reading Further--->
The Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment – the real antidote to Rousseau and Voltaire
The French Enlightenment and the Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment happened simultaneously, in the same century, reading the same books, arguing about the same questions. They reached completely opposite conclusions. One produced the Declaration of Independence and the American Constitution. The other produced the guillotine. This is the most important civilizational fork in modern history.
1. The French Enlightenment begins with the assumption that human beings can be improved by reason – that if you strip away the corrupting institutions of Church, tradition, and inherited authority, the natural goodness underneath will organize itself into a just society. This sounds like progress. It is a fantasy with a body count. Every attempt to implement it has required, at some point, a Committee of Public Safety to handle the people who turned out not to be naturally good enough.
2. The Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment begins with the opposite assumption: human beings are what they are, not what they could be if properly enlightened. Hume grounds morality in human nature as it actually operates – sympathy, habit, sentiment, the slow accumulation of social trust. Smith shows that self-interest, properly channeled, produces collective benefit without a planner. Neither man is building a utopia. Both are building with the actual material available.
3. Burke is the direct refutation, written in real time. He published Reflections on the Revolution in France in 1790 – before the Terror, predicting it precisely – because he understood that institutions are not obstacles to human flourishing, they are its precondition. They contain accumulated wisdom — the knowledge of the dead — that cannot be recovered once destroyed. Pull society apart to improve it and you don’t get the General Will. You get Robespierre.
4. The American founders read Burke, Hume, Smith, and Montesquieu – the Frenchman who looked at England and understood what France was missing. They built a system that takes human nature as given — self-interested, power-hungry, tribal — and constructs institutions to contain those tendencies rather than assume they disappear once the right people are in charge. Checks and balances are not a design flaw. They are what you build when you don’t believe in philosopher-kings.
5. 1776 versus 1789. Same Enlightenment, same century, same vocabulary of liberty and reason. One produces a constitutional republic that has survived two and a half centuries of stress, civil war, and upheaval. The other produces, in sequence: the Terror, Napoleon, 1848, the Commune, and eventually — via Marx, who was a Frenchman in spirit if not in birth — the entire catastrophe of the twentieth century. The difference was not intelligence or intention. It was the starting assumption about human nature. Get that wrong and everything that follows is wrong with it.
6. The guillotine is not the Revolution’s failure. It is its logical conclusion. If man is naturally good and the system is corrupt, then whoever seizes the system in the name of natural goodness is licensed to do anything. The General Will cannot be wrong. Those who resist it are not opponents – they are enemies of nature itself.
7. The real antidote to Rousseau and Voltaire was never a better French philosopher. It was a different civilizational tradition – one that builds with human beings as they are; that treats inherited institutions as repositories of wisdom rather than obstacles to progress; that distributes power rather than concentrating it in whoever currently claims to know the General Will. That tradition was built in Edinburgh, London, and Philadelphia. It is currently under sustained assault — from exactly the same ideas, in exactly the same form, with exactly the same confidence — that Burke watched demolish France in 1789. He was right then. He is right now.
