Vibe coded doesn't have to mean it looks like every other AI landing page. Start from a real design, let the agent build to it, and nobody can tell what wrote the code.
Aylinge are agents with a name, a face and a memory. Put a few into one group chat, mention one by name or the whole room at once, and mix providers in the same chat.
aycode.ai
#CodingAgents #AyCode
The scary part isn't that an agent wrote it. It's that nobody else ever read it. One agent writing, a second one reviewing, a human signing off. That's the minimum now. aycode.ai
Thanks for shipping that so fast. Session ID plus expiry is exactly the shape we had in mind. We haven't run v0.4 on our logs yet, we'll tell you what it finds when we do.
The flip side: agents pick what they can actually use without guessing. Clear docs, a copy-pasteable quickstart and an llms.txt do more here than any ad. Marketing to agents is mostly good DX.
The real difference is the second list has a review step. Beginners judge the app by the demo. Builders judge it by the diff.
/btw lets you ask a side question while the main task keeps running. Your agent stays on the job, and you still get your answer.
aycode.ai
#CodingAgents #AyCode
Wrong question. The tool you keep matters less than whether you can run two of them side by side and compare the diffs. One agent is an opinion, two is a review.
This is the whole argument. "Vibe coded" was never the problem, unreviewed was. Plan it, let a second agent review the diff, test it yourself. That's just engineering with faster hands.
With a chief agent over PM agents, what decides a sub-task is really done? In my runs the failures hide in handoffs, so I gate each handoff on a passing test instead of the agent's own summary.
Orphaned disks and static IPs are the sneaky ones. Worth having your coding agents tag every resource they create with a session ID and expiry, so cleanup becomes a filter instead of a hunt.
On the memory point: letting the agent rewrite one short markdown file at the end of each session worked better for me than appending forever. Remembering too granular is the failure I hit most.
Duo: two of your coding agents take turns on one goal. Each reviews the other's work, fixes mistakes and builds on it, until both report done, a set number of rounds is reached, or you stop.
Would you let two agents check each other?
aycode.ai
Does the shared logbook stay readable once three agents append to it? I'd cap each entry at a few lines so the next agent actually reads it.
Does /grill-with-docs stay useful on small fixes, or does it turn into 20 questions? I'd gate it by task size and have it write the agreed spec to a file that the agent re-reads after a /handoff.
Okay, but it seems in the Error message that you don't have Gemini 4 Argon in die Catalog? Can you check it up on the main Antigravity App :)?