Pinned Tweet
Calling all faculty and PhD candidates – if you teach and/or research Bitcoin, we want to hear from you.
BEI is proud to announce our First Annual Conference, which will be held at the George Washington University in Washington, DC, on July 31, 2026. The Conference is by academics, for academics.
We’re offering honoraria for selected speakers:
💰 $3,000 – Teaching Talk
💰 $1,500 – Research Talk
💰 $500 – Grad Student Poster Session
The only rule? The topic must be specific to Bitcoin – nothing that addresses crypto or blockchain in a general sense. We're reviewing applications are on a rolling basis.
Apply here:
🔗 Teaching Talk: tinyurl.com/57xxrx6b
🔗 Research Talk: tinyurl.com/e4rh6pws
🔗 Poster Session: tinyurl.com/33crj98c
And if you're interested in simply, register for free here: tinyurl.com/h42awjyy
See you in DC! ⚡️ #Bitcoin #BEI #HigherEd
18 years ago today, Satoshi Nakamoto published what we believe is one of the most important documents ever written.
The Bitcoin white paper connected mathematics, computing, and economics to reimagine how money could work.
Its ideas deserve to be studied for generations to come.
Bitcoin challenges ideas that students are often taught to take for granted.
Who should control money?
What makes ownership secure?
How do institutions earn trust?
Education should give students the foundation to examine those questions for themselves.
Universities help society understand ideas that change the world.
Bitcoin deserves that same intellectual effort.
Its implications for money, ownership, and economic coordination are too significant to leave outside serious academic discussion.
When you receive a payment online, how do you know it’s valid?
Did you check it yourself, or did your banking app just tell you it arrived?
Usually, you trust the institution to update its records and make the funds available.
Bitcoin offers a different option. You can check the payment yourself with your own node.
You confirm it follows the rules, spends available funds, and is included in the blockchain.
This changes trust, verification, and how money works on the internet.
This is worth serious study in universities.
How does an idea from outside the financial system begin to challenge it?
A study of Bitcoin suggests that people don’t need the same motivations to contribute to the same change.
As different groups build and use Bitcoin in their own ways, their efforts can strengthen an alternative to established financial practices.
The research is by Saurav Kumar and Dmitrj Slepniov of Aalborg University and Niall MacKenzie of the University of Strathclyde.
See the full paper here:
doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg…
A Bitcoin wallet doesn’t contain coins.
Most people do not understand this.
The wallet contains keys that authorize spending, while the Bitcoin network records the transactions.
Understanding that separation explains how a wallet can stay offline while its owner still receives bitcoin.
Bitcoin deserves a place in the curriculum because of the questions it forces us to ask.
What makes money credible?
How does ownership work?
Can strangers coordinate without a central authority?
These questions reach well beyond Bitcoin.
The future of Bitcoin education should include a lab.
Let students watch a transaction enter the mempool, wait for a block, and receive confirmations.
Seeing the process turns unfamiliar vocabulary into something they can understand.
Bitcoin education should give students the confidence to use it safely and interact directly with the network.
Learn how cold storage works, protect a recovery phrase, and connect a wallet to your own node.
Understanding Bitcoin means knowing how to secure your keys and verify payments for yourself.
Who should decide how much money exists?
Bitcoin gives economics students an alternative to examine:
A supply schedule enforced by software and independently verified by participants.
How might a fixed money supply reshape incentives, investment, and economic growth?
How can you own something you can’t touch?
Bitcoin has no physical form. So what exactly do you own?
You own Bitcoin, and your private keys give you the power to spend it without asking a bank or company to release it.
It’s digital property you can transfer across the internet without shipping a thing.
Combine that portability with direct control and a supply capped at 21 million, and you have a powerful case for the best money humanity has ever seen.
Understanding money should be a fundamental part of everyone's education.
We spend our entire lives earning, saving, and spending money.
Yet how often are we taught how money actually works?
Bitcoin challenges us to ask deeper questions about value, scarcity, and the rules governing our financial system.
“Someone will invent a better Bitcoin.”
That argument overlooks the human network that makes money useful.
Someone can build an app with better features than X. Getting its users to move is a different challenge.
Money needs shared acceptance and earned trust.
A Bitcoin competitor must attract more than users. It needs their confidence, capital, and commitment to a shared set of rules.
Bitcoin’s network effects make replacing it a much bigger challenge than simply writing better code.
Bitcoin crosses borders. Studying it should cross disciplines.
Economics explains the incentives.
Computer science explains the system.
Law and engineering reveal its implications and constraints.
Understanding Bitcoin means bringing those perspectives together.
The most fascinating thing about studying Bitcoin isn't just Bitcoin. It's what you discover about money.
Studying a different monetary system gives you a reason to examine the one you already use.
We spend years learning how to earn money.
How much time do we spend learning how money works?
Bitcoin is a reason to ask better questions.
Students will inherit a financial world shaped by technologies their education must help them understand.
Bitcoin belongs in that preparation.
Teach how it works, examine what it could change, and give its risks the same serious attention as its potential.
Bitcoin gives students a live case study in how economic incentives shape a computer network.
Why spend resources mining? Why follow the rules?
A serious Bitcoin lesson connects the engineering to the human decisions that keep the system running.
Bitcoin is no longer a niche technological experiment.
Its growing integration into financial markets is challenging long-established assumptions about money, settlement, and ownership.
At Bitcoin Education Institute, we believe these changes demand rigorous research, education, and open debate.
Bitcoin challenges how we think about money, ownership, and the future of finance.
Dismissing it as pure speculation overlooks the unique properties and network effects driving its adoption.
At Bitcoin Education Institute, we believe that Bitcoin's potential demands serious study, curiosity, and open debate.
