It’s not a reference to the statue, but satirization of the construct of her response. I lost patience with Megan and blocked her because she’s a snake, full stop. I knew her before she became an apologist for creeps and racists and I’ve been pretty genuinely disappointed at how the evils attendant to seeking temporal fame have basically eaten her from the inside. Ultimately, whether you believe the statue is a demon or not, she tried to make an exception for someone she liked; she seemed shocked that a person who falls into the category she denigrated would object to being denigrated, and then nervously shed crocodile tears in her mentions, profusely expressing shock that ANYONE would ever DARE to send a nasty message to someone who belongs to a group she hurled insults at and supported racist critics of for days beforehand. If you paint a group of people with a broad brush, you should have the courage to stand behind that assessment, even once you realize it makes you a bigot. You don’t get to stand behind your religion when, say, someone you respect like @HarmeetKDhillon is affected by the fruit of your claims (“demon worshipper” is also far from the only thing Megan called or agreed on with regard to Hindus). If she believes it, she should have the balls to tell Harmeet to her face that she’s a demon worshipper, not act aghast in her comments that Harmeet doesn’t like being the subject of bigoted language. By the way, we don’t believe every pagan god is a “demon,” as Catholics. Put simply (because this requires truncating), they certainly COULD be demons, but more likely they’re just imaginary, and the people who worship them are breaking a commandment against idols. The supposition is that they haven’t been exposed to Christ and will have an interesting time of it when they get to the afterlife — but true ignorance of Christ can be forgiven at the gate. We’re far harsher on people like Megan, who have not only known and refused allegiance to the one true Catholic Church, but denigrated it while living.