Climpy Biscuit

The case against me below is completely intellectually dishonest, filled with lies and misrepresentations, wrong about almost literally everything it says—a textbook example of propaganda: - I didn’t say scaling laws didn’t work ever; I said that pure scaling would reach a point if diminishing returns (it did) - I didn’t say AI progress in general would have diminishing returns; I said pure scaling would (it did; neurosymbolic tools and harness are doing a lot for the work now, as I said they would) - I didn’t say deep learning would hit a dead end forever; i said it would need to encompass new mechanisms such as neurosymbolic AI (it did) - I didn’t say models would never improve; i said GPT-5 wouldn’t arrive in 2024 (it didn’t) - I never said LLMs aren’t any good (I have often pointed to reasonable use cases like coding) - Only part that is partly true is that O signed the pause letter, but as I noted publicly at the time it was because I thought we should have more research on AI safety (still do). (If you care about fair play and seeking truth, I hope you would consider retweeting this.)