Co-Founder @BlockofHorror | Protector of Autonomy, Reason, Community, Decentralization & Humor

Everywhere
Joined August 2015
One of the burgeoning ramifications we will see with AI is waves of psychosis Not from AI, from us, humans Existential fear coupled with these new profound ways of society functioning is going to make Covid look like a kid's ice-cream party by comparison I'm talking about people losing their absolute god dam minds Religions and extremist ideology will skyrocket Suicides will go through the roof Fractures in societies and cultures will manifest in ways we never saw coming Men will bang robots Women will replace dads with dadbots Kids will go to their Optimus for advice and reassurance Parents will outsource their parenting to the machines Couples will spice it up in the bedroom with robotic foreplay threesomes Friends will run their chats through GPT so they don't have to be present Grandparents will call their robots instead of their grandkids Jobs? You will either babysit a robot farm or one will be babysitting you Freedom? Your life will be one big spread sheet of data that is mined with flock cameras and controlled by social credit You said fuktard or turdfagg to a friend in jest, app Siri caught that, now it's off to Guantanamo 1984 wasn't a warning, it was a premonition, we just don't know for when Just like Irobot, Terminator and every post-apocalyptic sci-fi story out there Artists are not some half-wits begging for money fron rich cucks, artists are philosophers who can't be bothered with the mindless pursuits of mainstream culture so they look out and in to describe what they see, but the only way to get the droolers in the front-row to pay attention is to give them something easy to follow. Shakespeare got this best, high concept art, simple storytelling A beautiful painting A perfect sculpture A poetic play A holy-shiiit movie The artists have been right at every turn, the true artists, the ones who know we are doomed if we don't change our ways, so they project a probable tale that feels so far away... the hero's journey, the Greek tragedian, the hubris Except it's here now It's real Cyberdyne exists, we just can't see it Everyone is about to have GPT in a robot cleaning dishes and preparing dinner It doesn't matter if we even get to the end-game, because we're already in its grip The asteroid is going to hit The only question is how we prepare with the time we have left And do any of us, some of us, survive and pave a new path after the dust settles IDK. I can only guess But, we don't make it to the other side of this thing if we don't stop the psychosis and deal in the most brutal of reality, that the Titanic is going to hit that iceberg and if we do not prepare now, we won't have enough life boats, hell maybe none at all It's looking dark out there But that's why we dig until we find the light, or die trying Even if AI doesn't hit true super intelligence, it's capabilities are already good enough that society will transform in ways, at unprecedented speeds, that will shake most's perception of reality and truth so deeply, they will go bonkers
1
3
470
Good. We must tear things down sometimes and build them back better.
MIT published a brutally honest report on what AI is doing to students. A committee of professors and students spent five months studying how AI changed learning on campus, and the findings read like a warning to every university on the planet. Study groups are disappearing. Office hours are emptying out. Problem sets and take-home exams no longer prove anything, because AI can produce credible solutions to almost any written assignment in the undergraduate curriculum. Students who lean on chatbots lose mastery and confidence, and some slip into what the report calls cognitive surrender, reaching for AI at the first hint of struggle. The numbers are rough. 46 percent of surveyed MIT undergrads use LLMs daily. 90 percent worry about their own overreliance. Undergrads who feel AI makes them replaceable now outnumber those who feel it makes them capable. The committee's answer surprised me. They refused to fight AI with surveillance. The report calls AI detectors unreliable, says lockdown browsers feel like spying, and warns that policing students builds a classroom atmosphere of mutual distrust. Instead, MIT wants to rebuild education around the things AI can't replace. That means oral exams, semester portfolios, in-person project work, and a required social component in every subject. The report even floats the idea of rethinking grades entirely, since without a GPA to optimize, much of the incentive to cheat with AI evaporates. The committee warns professors against replacing undergrad research assistants with AI agents just because they're cheaper, because a university exists to grow people, not output. The most famous tech school on earth admitted the machines broke its way of teaching. Its answer is more humans, not more software.
2
3
235
Tim Urban is correct
It is not like other technologies
2
1
272
Ironically, this isn't far-fetched Every entrepreneur is looking for funding at all times, and if big brother is the one most likely to pay-up, the smart business decision is to align with 'em And in the age of Ai, I'm sure this was hashed out at length with their own super-intelligence
When companies go public they must file paperwork disclosing their financials. Doing so would expose the massive cash burn OpenAI is using. Therefore, Sam Altman can't go public but he also has run out of money. Enter "whistle blower" Jacob Coxon. It made no sense how an obscure nobody got 165 million views on his first X post saying AI could kill us all. Then he was on every news station within 48 hours, scaring the public. This was a psyop to "regulate" the AI companies... aka give them government funding to "protect the public from the dangers of AI."
218
We'll be extinct before this comes out
DEFEND MANKIND. JOIN THE DOMINION. STARCRAFT. 2030.
1
218
Been saying this for years The Pronouns culture war for example is an anthill compared to this Mount Everest of ACTUALLY ENGAGE ON
Once you accept that AI extinction risk is real you find yourself at a personal crossroads. A lot of people are probably finding themselves newly there right now. If this is real, how can anything else matter? The answer is: it can’t, it doesn’t. This is our only problem. We solve this and we survive, we don’t and we don’t. Every other problem is secondary to this. So to @TMZ @jimmykimmel @TuckerCarlson @billmaher @andersoncooper @BretBaier @jonfavs @NBCNightlyNews @WSJopinion And everyone else in the media who just this week started taking extinction risk seriously: don’t stop. No other stories matter. This is the only story to cover. This cannot be a one day or one week or one month story. This is the story of our time. It is the biggest story of all time. Keep pushing. @TMZ ask a new celebrity how they feel about AI extinction risk every day for the next year. This should be the lead story of the news until there’s an international treaty with China banning Superintelligence, and then it should still lead the news for the next five years after that about how well enforcement is going.
223
Necessity is the mother of invention We have to be on the same page with the most powerful tool in history Call it communism or capitalism or the matrix or freedom, ideology is irrelevant When the titanic was taking on water nobody cared about ideology, they only cared about saving themselves, their loved ones, and as many people as possible
5
183
How does one go about going all in working with both @OpenAI AND @AnthropicAI on alignment? One thing that may be missing on the alignment front is the artist's touch, the Sistine Chapel becomes a flat dry wall without it. Great building, no soul Those who predicted the Irobots, West Worlds and Terminators well enough to make hit stories for mass appeal The ones who understand, deeply, how hubris comes before a great fall thanks to the Greek tragedies and Aristotle And yes, Fable or Astra can reasonably deduct much of this too, but only from an intellectual and pattern matching sense, not from a lived experience that only Shakespeare himself could explain, the writing a story so deep you nearly lose touch with reality, which was the point, because he did, when his son tragically died as a child, thus the greatest literary character was born, out of that unbearable suffering The pursuit of self-alignment and failing to do so was the point of his best work I'm not sure one person can have the answer to alignment, but if the great artists and philosophers of human history have taught us anything, it's that the outsiders, the black sheep, the Socrates and Teslas were right, one executed by insiders and mobs of mainstreamers, one dying dirt-poor when he chose alignment instead of investor profits Imho, the answers on alignment are within us, because that's where the machines are learning from, and we can't afford just investors or engineers to be at the forefront of this crisis We need the kinds of minds at the table who are willing to step on toes, even the Queen's. Shakespeare wrote his comedies to appease the masses and the one who could chop off his head, when he was really wanting to warn us about ourselves As You Like It, your majesty.. Much Ado About Nothing, but pays rent! Two Dudes in a City, who cares.? Alls Well That Ends Well, here's sloppp Romeo & Juliet, tribal vengeance🗡️ Macbeth, power corrupts to evil😈 Hamlet, misaligned with truth and we lose body, soul and reality itself 😶‍🌫️ Notice the running themes from the greats, they were feeding future generations a playbook on HUMAN alignment, which we still have not mastered. Pride comes before the fall gentlemen A tale as old as time. Invite the best artistic and philosophical minds to the table, while we still can, too much is at stake to role play Oedipus @sama @DarioAmodei Who am I? No one. Neither are most artists and philosophers, because it's not about them, it's about the idea, the art, the truth, the alignment within oneself. I just don't want you to think your yes men, investors or mobs are the sounding boards you need. You need to dig deeper and be willing to offend the Queen to her face without her realizing it, so you can pursue true alignment, one that starts from within, at the deepest point
1
199
I said this the other day Jurors should not be outing themselves or other jurors right after a high profile case for any reason It's a horrible precedent that puts outside pressure on jurors to conform to whatever outside pressure is strongest Regardless of L or R politics, this type of targeting jurors or getting scoops from jurors has to be reigned in Not everything is supposed to become public knowledge for media clicks
We’ve never seen anything like this before. A man was conscripted into jury duty by the government. He performed his civic duty and followed his conscience, refusing to acquit a woman who confessed to systematically executing her three children. The defense attorney immediately launched a public smear campaign against the juror. Soon several other jurors joined the campaign. Then the media. Even the defense attorney’s wife has joined. Now they’re doxxing the man, digging into his past, contacting his family, showing up at his house. All of this both to punish him for refusing to go with their program, and to pollute any future jury pool by making it clear that anyone who votes to convict Clancy will have their life destroyed. It’s truly one of the most outrageously evil things we’ve ever seen from the Left, and that’s saying something. A direct assault on the integrity of our justice system. They are burning down every boundary and standard in their path. And doing it all for the sake of a child murdering psychopath. Unfathomable.
161
Will AI destroy us? Insiders at labs put that possibility at > 10% probability So let's ask ourselves the hardest question ever, in a cleaner way... You are at the Poker table, on the cusp of winning a trillion dollars if you win THIS hand But, there's a 10% chance the next card wipes out all your money, seizes your bank accounts, takes every penny from your family, friends and community, oh, and everyone literally dies a brutal death. Do we A. Fold and figure out how to avoid that catastrophic downside risk? Or B. Say, odds look good, YOLO, and risk everything for a life-changing opportunity? It depends your risk-appetite. Mine? I have kids. I am obligated to protect THEIR interests, their future, and then THEIR kids someday. I cannot take that risk, until there is a clear probability that catastrophe will not happen. Solution? 1. This topic needs to be at the forefront of every conversation at every opportunity, no more letting people sit foolishly in ignorance 2. Elect leaders who understand the depth of this topic, not just the full-steam ahead ones nor the get off Disney Cruise because just heard about Titanic 3. We've got to coordinate with China + We cannot afford the risk that they or us suspect the other has the ultimate super-power, because then one will be forced to preemptively strike the other and then it's literally WW3 for the world, and most get obliterated If I had no kids, I'd likely roll the dice to see the card. And that shows us the human dilemma. The risk takers don't feel a responsibility to preserve what we have, they are okay risking it all for a chance at the ultimate glory, and that is hubris, pride coming before a great fall We cannot afford to get this wrong. We cannot afford a Greek Tragic Hero.
1
1
2
255
Why did people used to have more sex? They literally had to connect, in person You had to learn confidence or game or how to talk to girls and you could attract them without filters or algos limiting your chances And girls got to actually meet guys in context to gauge if they were worth a shot May never give my kids social media tbh
🇺🇸 High school before smartphones existed.... -No constant scrolling -Actual conversations -Passing notes -Making plans in person A world that has been lost to us. Writer: Samuel
1
2
281
Dumb question Can I just make up 24 words of my choosing for a private key? How/where can i do this. Good luck guessing Cockring Bier Lactose And Ididnothavesexualrelationswiththatwoman As 4 of 24 totally random words. @0xQuit ?
1
163
Because of kids I'm finally looking forward to visiting or revisiting - Pirates of Caribbean - LoTR everything - Harry Potter series books and movies not new series rehash - All 90's feel good family movies - Disney classics - The Full Toy Story What am I missing from this list? Narnia? Jack Persey?
1
6
276
The unbridled pursuit of profits Is called greed Not everything needs max upside incentives And this includes cinema Why do we get so many bloated, redundant, spin-off, remake whiffs in Hollywood these days? Because every financing choice is less and less to do with art and storytelling and more and more to do with what gives investors the best ROI upside based on the risk In a sense, they sold out decades ago, and the artwork has plummeted year by year Just like medicine in America Just like FIFA is trying to do Just like colleges in USA did When we sell our souls, we may gain leverage for outsized returns, but we also lose the why we did any of this in the first place, and if you're telling stories to make money, first, you are not worthy of being an artist, you are an investor cosplaying as one This is why I originally dreamt up Block of Horror, in the spirit of decentralization, to attack the system of greed that destroys a man's soul, then becomes a succubus for anything he touches Basically, our world is a Horror Story, and until we reckon with the system of ghouls sucking the life out of us for more money than they need, for no purpose, we will continue to have the deepest parts of our spirit wither away
Europe just quit the World Cup. UEFA and all 55 of its national associations announced they will not participate in FIFA competitions. No France, no England, no Spain, no Germany in the biggest tournament on earth. The trigger is wild. Infantino wants to sell a piece of the World Cup to private investors for $4.2 billion. And each of the 211 national associations gets $20 million for voting yes. 211 times $20 million is $4.2 billion. The entire raise equals the approval payments. The investors would be funding the yes votes on their own acquisition. Infantino thought the voting math made him unbeatable. FIFA runs on one country, one vote, so San Marino counts the same as Germany, and $86 million per federation through 2038 is transformative for small associations that have never qualified for a World Cup. He needs 106 of 211 votes, and he was buying them at retail. UEFA just found the counter. Europe can't win the vote, so it's destroying the asset instead. European teams have won 12 of the 22 World Cups ever played. European broadcast money anchors the rights being sold. A World Cup without Europe is worth a fraction of the price, and every investor Kushner and JP Morgan are courting knows it by now. The F1 comparison everyone's making misses the difference. Greg Maffei, who ran Liberty Media's Formula 1 takeover, is structuring this deal, but F1 privatization worked because the teams had nowhere else to race. UEFA already runs the Champions League and the Euros. Europe can exist without FIFA. FIFA cannot exist without Europe. The vote is September 19. Infantino has the votes. UEFA has the teams. Only one of those makes a World Cup worth watching.
1
195
Nolan stans when he breathes
This quoted post is unavailable.
147
If it is objectively a 9.5/10, it's one of his top 2 movies, and it's objectively not in his top 5. Not even close. Even the "I loved it" crowd wouldn't put it that high People still refer to Memento as mind bending all-timer and I still haven't seen it Inception is a psychological mind fuk that keeps you guessing Dark Knight and Heath Ledger redefined supervillains Interstellar has some of the best memes on the internet from its visceral impact Dunkirk made you glad you were not your WW2 drafted grandad Oppenheimer shed light with the warm-up to what will happen with AGI THE ODYSSEY? The best it did was make thinking people want to read the source material Nothing to quote like Gladiator. No Oscar winning performances. The music was a cool idea yet whiffed. Out of focus close ups. A rapper pretending to be an actor doing a poem tanked the opening due to no acting chops. Three ships then one ship then three ships continuity blunder. No woman gets more than a stagnant sitting scene, save the former one running like a duck to a wooden horse It was a rushed, on Hollywood blockbuster deadlines, mish-mash of some cool things and great acting moments, with Dante's Inferno, lukewarm Greek Mythology minus real Gods, and an animatronic dog that made you just want to watch Hachi: A Dog's Tale again It was fine. We are so starved for high quality storytelling in Blockbuster cinema, a forced adaptation of The Odyssey that gets rushed to market gets cancelled or deep-throated, when it deserves neither. It was fine. Expected more, needed more time, and a better script and casting that fit character regardless of ethnicities. I'd have preferred an all minority cast if it matched better characterizations All that said, art is hard. It is subjective. Nolan does fantastic swings creatively. And his work hits at the Box Office. This was a modern Hollywood Blockbuster. The days of never saw that one coming knocking our socks off, has been over for decade, hate to say Maybe the overlords of our modern world like @elonmusk @JeffBezos will invest in creators again who can afford to take risks to nail the next summer blockbuster without a Nolan's box office pedigree. Who knows
The chasm between chronically online people and the real world has never been more palpable than today’s current “discussion” over The Odyssey. People who live on the internet (in both political directions it seems) are lost in the sauce, so deep in their own echo chambers that they’re utterly incapable of “coming up for air” and realizing how out of touch they are with majority opinion. You can say whatever you want about Nolan’s work, his motives, his screenplays (The Odyssey included) but nothing will change the fact that this film is going to make more than a billion dollars, win him another fat round of Oscar’s, and rank him even higher on the list of “talented filmmakers” because *shock* The Odyssey is an objectively incredible film. For those on the right wing: it doesn’t matter that a tranny chick plays a soldier (less than 4 min of screen time), or that a black woman plays Helen of Troy (3-5 min total screen time), and if Travis Scott wasn’t listed on the cast no one would know he was even involved. The film is *not* overtly anti-colonialist in a way that villainizes white people, nor are Nolan’s departure(s) from source material “anti-European” in a way that screams woke. In fact, much of the storyline felt like subjective interpretations from Nolan himself that are neither overly Left or Right leaning. I’m still struggling to understand why the Left would have an issue with Nolan’s version of The Odyssey, and this gripe from Emily Wilson (writer known for TO’s latest interpretation) seems to be coming from a personal place (rather than disappointment over Nolan not honoring source material). Very strange conversations happening online regarding this film. The Odyssey is a hard 9/9.5-10
3
439
No one will say it but Nolan's best work in The Odyssey were the "horror" sequences, he'd have slayed had he chosen Dante's Inferno...
1
4
333
It's fairly objectively clear that Nolan basically took a few pieces he liked of an epic classic to make his version his way I've been doing this with a Shakespeare Tragedy spin too, but I always try to go back to the source material to anchor characterizations, even if I then twist them sideways The idea is like a socially borderline joke, you have to stick the landing or many will assume it to be a hack job that doesn't respect boundaries at all
I have personally studied Greek mythology extensively for many years. I have read so much about it that I am familiar with virtually every character from ancient Greek civilization. I know, according to Greek mythology, how the Titans were born from the union of Gaia and Uranus, the war between the Titans and the Olympians known as the Titanomachy, the Trojan War, and countless stories involving Olympian gods, creatures, monsters, kings, adventures, and mythological battles. I love Greek mythology so much that for the last 28 years I have continuously read about it from authentic sources, and I still do. I enjoy learning about every single character in Greek mythology. The Odyssey movie, directed by Christopher Nolan, is the worst adaptation I have ever seen. I did not expect such direction from Christopher Nolan. There are virtually no Greek gods in the film, and almost no Greek creatures either—only two creatures are shown, and even they are not portrayed realistically. However, in the original Odyssey, Odysseus spent seven years on an island where he forgot his past and even forgot about returning home after consuming the lotus flower. The woman with whom he spent those seven years was herself a goddess named Calypso. Later, Calypso allowed Odysseus to leave her island and return home at the request of Zeus, king of the Olympian gods. These events are central to the original narrative, yet they were not properly depicted in the movie. Furthermore, the story taken from Homer's original Odyssey was not presented accurately. The Greek poet Homer wrote two great epics: the Iliad and the Odyssey. The Iliad covers the events of the Trojan War and its conclusion, while the Odyssey tells the story of the long sea journey home after the Trojan War. Those who are calling Odyssey a great movie should first check the complete historical background of Homer's original Odyssey on YouTube. Then they will understand what the actual epic was like and what Christopher Nolan has created instead. Another example is the cave sequence. In the movie, only a single Cyclops—the one-eyed giant—is shown. In the original epic, there was one Cyclops inside the cave, but hundreds more outside. When Odysseus and his companions blinded the Cyclops and attempted to escape, they tied themselves beneath sheep and carefully made their way out. Moreover, the Cyclopes were said to be the sons of Poseidon, the Greek god of the sea. None of these important details were properly shown. There are many more significant events and characters in the original work. In my opinion, the movie uses only about 5% of the original Odyssey as inspiration. If I were to explain all the differences, it would take all night. Christopher Nolan has completely distorted the original Odyssey. My personal rating would be 3.5 out of 10. I am extremely disappointed after watching this movie. 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮😡
1
8
472
Got my start in theater where everyone is always doing revivals, adaptations, reverse casting and so on. Without a doubt, the biggest failures always came when a director took a major risk to do something "interesting" with a classic, that was too far off its source material. I was in a butchered translation of Antigone as Haemon. Goofy Irish Translation of source material killed it. The best shows? Whether Shakespeare or August Wilson or Moliere or modern plays, always slapped because the source material, at its core, was respected, even when creative liberties were taken like adding a Pre-show or talking lines to the audience or giving it a modern environment. The difference in cinema is no one can afford to take THOSE big of risks, unless you are a top director like Nolan. I respect his attempt to make it his version of The Odyssey, but the source material means too much to too many people to get that once in a generation take on a film that was rushed to the finish line for Hollywood Blockbuster deadlines. If you understand the mechanisms of how Hollywood works, how creatives take liberties with classics and what actually works or not from experience, it becomes clear that The Odyssey was a floundering success, one man's bold attempt to Trojan Horse a classic from his vantage point of the human condition and rushed from inception to final delivery, the out of focus closeups, pacing inconsistencies, and wonky dialogue proving it so. Not to mention opening the movie with a non-actor doing a bad rap of a poem to completely bastardize what it means to actually be an actor. Most of the time, just sticking the landing on the basics is enough, trust it.
1
227