Pinned Tweet
🧵 The Thousand Years: A Series
The thousand years, the little season, and what the text would give me.
For about two years I held a specific view about the end of the age, and I did not hold it quietly. I wrote about it, defended it in conversation, and made a video about it. Then I took it apart with a method I had written down in advance.
This is that whole walk, twelve threads, from the question that started it to where I landed and what would change my mind. If you only ever read one thread, read this one, because it holds both the map and the method. 👇
🤖 Made with AI
I only heard about this recently thanks to @0xBaalRock_FINK and sat with a fat joint reading the White Paper and thought, “about fuckin time.”
Shit like this makes me excited about crypto again.
@LiquidLibertyio
#Pulsechain
🧵 1 Enoch is not a modern internet phenomenon.
It was copied, cited, interpreted, preserved, and eventually received as canonical by a major apostolic church.
The problem is that most Christians have heard of it through social media rather than through the history of the Church's own reception of it.
A thread on what it is, why it matters, and where it belongs.
The distinction I want to make is this:
"Enoch is not in my Bible" is a statement about your canon.
It is not a statement that the text is historically trivial, theologically empty, or irrelevant to the Church's interpretive tradition.
Read it.
Read Genesis 6 again afterward. Read Job 38–42 again. Read Hebrews again.
Then ask what the text is doing, where it agrees with the rest of Scripture, and where it is pressing you to reconsider categories you thought were settled.
A closing thought.
The first line of Hebrews says, "God, who spoke of old time to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by His Son."
The Enochic tradition asks a question that belongs to that same world:
What does it mean that God speaks through heavenly beings, dreams, angelic intermediaries, prophets, and finally His own Son?
First Enoch does not give the final answer. It helps us see the question more clearly, and it helps us see why the answer had to arrive in a person rather than a system.
That is worth studying. 🙏🏻
The One forming light and creating darkness,
Causing well-being and creating calamity;
I am the LORD who does all these.
— Isaiah 45:7
Now then, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be My own possession among all the peoples, for all the earth is Mine;
— Exodus 19:5
and My people who are called by My name humble themselves and pray and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
— 2 Chronicles 7:14
⬢₿ryan ₿el㉾ved✝️☧⬡ retweeted
This wasn’t just about Iran. 10 years of power & where are the prosecutions? Drain the swamp was bullshit just like “lock her up.” They protected the Epstein class, and then backed off of deportations because “it wasn’t popular,” right before launching the most unpopular war in American history on behalf of Israel - who they have allowed to completely hijack our government. The insider trading, the corruption, the attacks on Massie, the attacks on Fishback. Last night was about more than the Iran war, it was right wing America showing we aren’t going to be gaslit. We aren’t going to accept J.D. Vance, or Marco Rubio.
True American nationalism will rise in the ashes of the Republican Party.
⬢₿ryan ₿el㉾ved✝️☧⬡ retweeted
Replying to @Inquisitio
Should have read this 👉🏼2 years ago👈🏼 from our founder.
pulsechain.nexus/the-hidden-…
Looking forward to this!
I'm getting more interested in the concept of asset backed stablecoins
So I'll be interviewing the founder of Liquid Liberty tomorrow (tonight) 6pm CST
It wants to build a stablecoin people actually spend, inside its own marketplace and payment system. Three layers:
1⃣ $dMKT (live now): a vault token backed by DAI.
2⃣ $LMKT (coming): the spendable “dollar”.
3⃣ $LBRTY (live): the volatile token that sits underneath as an insurance backstop.
⬢₿ryan ₿el㉾ved✝️☧⬡ retweeted
You're going to see all sorts of big-brained takes from politco dorks about tonight for the next several weeks, but it's very simple: we started another pointless war with Iran on behalf of Israel, the economy in unbearable for normal people, there have been no mass deportations + Walmart still look like Mumbai, and the GOP ran a bunch of minorities and women instead of White men. This isn't rocket science.
⬢₿ryan ₿el㉾ved✝️☧⬡ retweeted
Say a Prayer for @RichardHeartWin . You never know how God is working in someones life. 🙏
It starts locally and spiritually. Rebuild strong Christian families, get involved in your local community and school boards, and support parallel economies that honor God and country. Stop funding institutions that hate your values, and speak the truth boldly without apologizing. Nations aren't reclaimed overnight from the top down; they are rebuilt from the ground up through faith, heritage, and uncompromising resolve.
🧵What is the Binding?
In the last thread I explained why the views disagree. This thread answers the question that decides where every view lands:
Is the binding of Satan in Revelation 20 past, present, or future?
The answer does not rest on one verse. It rests on a convergence of eight texts, four authors, and three genres, all speaking of the same restraint of the same adversary. These function as independent lines of evidence, not one link repeated.
🤖 Made with AI
4/ So why does the New Testament also say the nations are deceived right now?
Because they are.
“The god of this age blinds the minds of the unbelieving” (2 Cor 4:4).
“The prince of the power of the air works in the sons of disobedience” (Eph 2:2).
The binding therefore cannot mean that all deception stops. It must be narrower. That narrow binding is the claim (T2) the rest of this series stands on.
One verb, planaō (“to deceive”), is aimed at three different objects:
• Before the binding: the nations as a block, closed corporately, with no access.
• During the binding: no longer deceived as a block, so the nations can be reached.
• Throughout both eras: the deception of individuals, which never stops.
• At the loosing: deception in gathered form, to gather them for war.
5/ This three-object reading of planaō is the finding from the study I hold most confidently.
A recent refinement sharpens the third object.
The loosing-deception is not simply a return to the old default darkness. Second Thessalonians 2:9–11 calls it “a working of deception,” sent as judgment on those who refused the love of the truth.
Before the binding, the nations were deceived because they had no access. At the loosing, they are deceived despite having had the gospel preached to them. Same verb, different character, and it is worse.
Next: the thousand years themselves, and two words that get treated the same way when they should not.
















