Twitch Affiliate | Partner With @drinkwraith | Affiliate with @conQgamingshop & @gmrwear | Code 'Bulmer1995' For Discounts! Contact:[email protected]
North West, England
Joined February 2012
- Tweets3.4K
- Following396
- Followers390
- Likes6.7K
Bulmer1995 retweeted
Listen to what Joe Hart says about this !
nitter.cf/patdog113/status/20991…
#MUNMCI – 59’ VAR OVERTURN
VAR checked the referee’s call of no goal for offside – and determined that Haaland was in an onside position and recommended that the goal was awarded.
The VAR also deemed that while in an offside position, Fernandez didn’t play the ball.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Per IFAB Law 11, a player in an offside position can be penalised for clearly attempting to play the ball (or other obvious actions) if it impacts an opponent, even without touching it.
thefa.com/football-rules…
x.com/TheIFAB/status…
Bulmer1995 retweeted
Martinez has to go defend the man nearest the goal whether he believes he’s offside or not. In split seconds, you make the decision. He goes to defend Fernandez - who then attempts to play the ball. Deluded from VAR!
Regardless - Utd never created enough chances once City went to 10 men.
Aside from the factual positions of Erling Haaland and Patrick Dorgu, there is a subjective decision too, as Manchester City’s Enzo Fernandez dives towards the ball and it flashes across the goal.
Had he touched it, he would have been offside. He didn’t, but there’s an argument that he affected the ability of Manchester United’s Lisandro Martinez to play the ball by being in his line of vision.
United have a case, but Martinez can see the ball all the way and the evidence would need to be more compelling for VAR to intervene.
On field, it is highly likely that Enzo’s actions were not given much consideration because the assistant was certain Haaland was offside.
As a result, the VAR was being asked to judge whether the officials at Old Trafford had made a clear error, when in reality they had not formed a judgement at all.
📝 @Refsplaining
🔗 nyti.ms/4gRAHxZ
Bulmer1995 retweeted
"Sack him"
Jamie O'Hara on whether Thomas Tuchel should remain as England manager after their defeat in the World Cup 🤔
Bulmer1995 retweeted
You drove farmers to suicide, tried to freeze pensioners to death and actively ignored and covered up the rape and torture of thousands of children and young women.
Absolutely no sympathy.
Bulmer1995 retweeted
Every newspaper in the UK is silent about the grooming gangs report.
They are complicit.
Bulmer1995 retweeted
EVERY FUCKING PERSON WHO HAS BEEN SCREAMING ABOUT THE EPSTEIN FILES FOR MONTHS...
...IS DEAD FUCKING SILENT ABOUT A QUARTER-OF-A-MILLION WHITE GIRLS BEING GANG RAPED BY MUSLIMS!!!
I DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT WHAT ANY OF YOU FUCKING PEOPLE HAVE TO SAY EVER AGAIN!!!!!!
Bulmer1995 retweeted
Nuremberg style trials and then the death penalty for the savages that committed these crimes against our people and those that facilitated it
Bulmer1995 retweeted
🚨NEW: The rape gang inquiry, carried out by Rupert Lowe, mentions the NHS recording genital injuries, STIs, and pregnancies in children as young as 11, then discharging them back to their abusers the same night
Bulmer1995 retweeted
Migrant attempts to BEHEAD a man on the streets of Belfast.. When will enough be enough? - Stop the Boats, Stop the Benefits, round these animals up & DEPORT en-masse ‼️
Bulmer1995 retweeted
Be prepared for Keir Starmer and most of Parliament being more concerned about how you react to the scenes in Belfast than the fact that an attempted beheading happened in a civilised, first world country.
Bulmer1995 retweeted
'When do you suppose Sir Keir will take the knee? And all the football players?'
'Don't hold your breath.'
@NickFerrariLBC reacts to the bodycam footage of Henry Nowak's death, and the 'day of shame' it's brought on Hampshire police.
Bulmer1995 retweeted
He had a beautiful family and kids and we got people celebrating bc he had his own views WIERDOS
