@CalLavicka
Joined August 2022
nobody: fable: *spawns 6 subagents*
4
52
This applies to "real" engineers as well - everyone is merging slop and that slop has a cost down the line
The new technical debt is AI-generated code committed by non–software engineers. The code gets merged into the code base and gradually convolutes the entire repository. Eventually, the code base becomes a spaghetti of AI-generated slop that not even the best LLMs can organize and refactor. It just becomes an endless nonsensical stream of patches and dead code.
4
260
Cal Lavicka retweeted
Our UI previews are: 0⃣ Zero-configuration required (no environment variables, virtual-machine, etc) ⚡️ Ready much faster than other background agent feature demos 🎨 Nicer than reviewing a diff, allow non-technical team-members to review frontend changes Review the code if you want; don't skip reviewing the product
1
3
7
49,356
Anyone else have this same issue when using Fable? Seems like an issue regarding the harness?
4
51
Makes me feel slightly less bad for requesting so many changes
In addition to a better review interface, we offer better PR author workflows. Some feedback really is worth your time and attention; other feedback really isn't. Hand it to your favorite cloud agent
4
219
Cal Lavicka retweeted
the first PR I saw in this with little automatic before/after component previews blew my mind. zero setup, no idea how it does it. and the topic clusters are great for navigating huge PRs and making sure you actually looked at everything important
Introducing Assert (assert.dev): the command center for reviewing engineering work Watch me review a new feature with Assert's product diff: a UI generated by our agent using mock data. It has completely changed how we work
1
3
1
8
1,045
Being able to test out UI directly in the review interface itself is incredible
Review changes to your product before changes to code
1
6
275
The goal is zero configuration needed - no one wants to spend forever configuring tooling
the first PR I saw in this with little automatic before/after component previews blew my mind. zero setup, no idea how it does it. and the topic clusters are great for navigating huge PRs and making sure you actually looked at everything important
1
4
250
Cal Lavicka retweeted
Really excited to finally share what we've been building at @assert_labs . My team and I have spent the past few months rethinking what code review should feel like in a world where both humans and AI are writing code. It's been a ton of work, but seeing it finally out in the open is incredibly rewarding. If you spend your days reviewing PRs, I'd love for you to give it a try - and please send us feedback! I'd genuinely love to hear what you think. We're just getting started. Lots more to come!
Introducing Assert (assert.dev): the command center for reviewing engineering work Watch me review a new feature with Assert's product diff: a UI generated by our agent using mock data. It has completely changed how we work
5
5
16
1,614
Super excited to show this to the world!
Introducing Assert (assert.dev): the command center for reviewing engineering work Watch me review a new feature with Assert's product diff: a UI generated by our agent using mock data. It has completely changed how we work
1
6
194
Cal Lavicka retweeted
More AI-generated code doesn't make your team faster. It might actually slow you down.
617
2,394
1,390
18,981
6,627,725
Cal Lavicka retweeted
We just moved into our first office in the Mission. My only requirements were that it be a single-story building and formerly a garage
It could actually be a significant problem that Europe doesn't have enough garages. This sounds like a joke, but I'm serious. Garages let you work on stuff that doesn't matter yet, which is how big things often start. The outliers of ideas need the outliers of space.
1
2
17
1,542
Cal Lavicka retweeted
Can a language model learn, end-to-end, what to keep in its own KV cache and what to throw away? Can it learn to forget while it learns to reason? Deep learning's central lesson: capability emerges from end-to-end optimization, not heuristics/strong inductive biases. But for efficiency, we rely heavily on hand-designed approaches. 🗑️ Introducing Neural Garbage Collection (NGC): we train a language model to jointly reason and manage its own KV cache, using reinforcement learning with outcome-based task reward alone. No SFT, no proxy objectives, no summarization in natural language. New paper with @jubayer_hamid, Emily Fox, and @noahdgoodman!
31
128
23
932
177,710
idk aws, should I use the "enhanced" builder, or the "advanced" one? tough choices...
1
2
87
Cal Lavicka retweeted
Welcome home Reid, Victor, Christina, and Jeremy! 🫶 The Artemis II astronauts have splashed down at 8:07pm ET (0007 UTC April 11), bringing their historic 10-day mission around the Moon to an end.
6,635
105,075
10,695
382,985
86,522,815
Cal Lavicka retweeted
We're hosting a happy hour for ~50 developers on Accel's rooftop tonight at 6:30 and have a few spots left. DM me to get added or RSVP at the link in the comments
1
3
1
10
826
"Strong preference for software that reduces chaos instead of adding more of it" everyone should strive for this
Products are built by humans, and I'm leaning into that. Added a new section to the Solo homepage.
3
102
Cal Lavicka retweeted
I've been seeing a lot of folk on the timeline say IDEs are dying. But I don't get it. Are you guys not reviewing the code your agents generate 😅
I hear the same. The IDE is dying. Everyone's managing agents now--mostly local, some cloud. Honestly Devin from @cognition is extremely slept on as the SOTA SWE agent.
66
21
4
698
56,490
When you give every engineer a magic button, it separates the ones who truly care about the craft and the ones who were never going to succeed anyways
The biggest issue for me with agents is that they are hard to resist. But then you can build yourself some shit into the codebase that you get to regret in record time. And no, I don't think you can vibe yourself back to sanity with better models.
1
45