@CbAr2004

God my saviour. England my home. Even if I am half 🇫🇷.

London, England
Joined April 2016
Burnham’s attempts to insinuate that the Brexit vote was rigged by Russian bots is a collective slur against 17.4m Leave voters and a cack-handed political intervention. If he’s seeking to weaken the moral case against Britain regaining its sovereignty, he’s making a misjudgment.
Russia tried but failed to interfere in the Brexit referendum. Confirmed by the security minister. Confirmed by the Foreign Office. Burnham should apologise to the British people in the Commons today for trying to delegitimise the result with his half truths. Shameful.
154
761
14
3,760
26,697
Mr Someone retweeted
Russia tried but failed to interfere in the Brexit referendum. Confirmed by the security minister. Confirmed by the Foreign Office. Burnham should apologise to the British people in the Commons today for trying to delegitimise the result with his half truths. Shameful.
694
776
80
3,864
167,955
They could’ve done this while in power. They chose not to.
We will scrap the equality duty. Leave the ECHR. And get rid of Labour’s “Islamophobia” definition. This is a new generation of Conservatives.
1
More on 'foreign interference' in the 2016 Brexit referendum... 👇
10
158
8
395
8,138
Oooh la la
EXCLUSIVE: Burnham’s Trade Secretary previously accepted donation from UAE Government. As the Prime Minister comes under pressure over £55 million taxpayer-funded loans, I have uncovered further evidence of Labour Party links to Abu Dhabi. Here’s what I found:🧵
91
953
15
3,312
36,218
Mr Someone retweeted
Pretty big story brewing here: US officials fear the UK gov’s obsession with bypassing Apple encryption could be used to spy on Farage Original reporting from @freddiejh8 and the @NewStatesman so can hardly be accused of right wing bias
White House Official Issues Warning Over UK Government Spying on Farage. Story in the link below.
55
863
13
2,506
29,586
Mr Someone retweeted
The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph revealed the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote". In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks. That was the only way that "nature" could win. However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo. The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House. The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural. Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain" Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar. The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists. Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths. Me on @GBNews: – at London, England
'Bank notes are one of the rare occasions when we get to come face-to-face with our history.' Historian Rafe Heydel-Mankoo and PETA's Jennifer White debate replacing British icons with wildlife on bank notes. 🇬🇧 Become a Friend of GB News: gbnews.com/support
483
3,792
183
11,859
280,562
Mr Someone retweeted
Well of course he does. He wants our £35 billion a year and free access to UK fishing waters. How naive can you possibly be?
🥳 🇫🇷 France’s finance minister @RolandLescure has told Britain: “Come back, anytime.” And on protecting British industry through the EU’s Made in Europe strategy, his answer could not be clearer: “Come back, and you’ll be at the table.” That demolishes two Brexit myths at once. Europe does want Britain back. But we cannot remain outside, demand the benefits of membership and complain that decisions are being made without us. Rejoining means returning to the table, with a voice, a vote and the power to shape the economic, industrial and security decisions determining Europe’s future. The door is open. Britain must now choose to walk through it.
2
2
5
285
“Brexit did deep damage to our economy,” says Andy Burnham. Deliberate deception is normally known simply as ‘lying’. Where’s the ‘honesty’ he talked about in his speech? We’ve summarised the great Brexit news for him: facts4eu.org/news/2026_oct_b… Pls re-post!
43
327
15
596
6,752
The man who led Serco when it won asylum-accommodation contracts estimated at £1.9 BILLION now sits on the board of the Home Office, the department that awarded them. Rupert Soames was Serco CEO from May 2014 to December 2022. In 2019, Serco won two ten-year asylum accommodation and support contracts covering the North West and Midlands & East of England. Soames described them as “the largest contracts by value ever awarded to Serco”. In June 2026, he joined the Home Office. It now lists him as its LEAD non-executive director. The department says its board steers and scrutinises its strategy, performance and capability. Serco remains an asylum-accommodation contractor. The former contractor chief now helps scrutinise the customer. How is the Home Office managing any potential conflicts of interest on Serco-related matters? Is he excluded from those discussions? £1.9bn was Serco’s original estimated ten-year contract value, not money already spent.
467
2,428
206
5,016
229,426
Mr Someone retweeted
Kemi Badenoch says the Conservatives let 4 million people into Britain in 4 years because “ministers didn’t notice.” 21 of the 27 people in her Shadow Cabinet were those ministers. Her entire team is incompetent and can't be trusted.
1,193
2,372
225
11,878
638,302
she literally lobbied for more work visas lol, lmao even
Kemi Badenoch says the Conservatives let 4 million people into Britain in 4 years because “ministers didn’t notice.” 21 of the 27 people in her Shadow Cabinet were those ministers. Her entire team is incompetent and can't be trusted.
19
151
6
1,090
31,795
Mr Someone retweeted
If Kemi Badenoch expels May, her message about changing the party may be taken seriously. May has been a menace for years.
Replying to @ramonagusta
A leopard never changes its spots.
150
178
19
1,057
15,518
Mr Someone retweeted
🚨NEW: Labour Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy is delaying the publication of a report into the UAE's attempt to take over The Telegraph [@Telegraph]
57
215
17
1,021
86,629
Mr Someone retweeted
This looks like Lisa Nandy is trying to delay publication of a report into the UAE’s attempted takeover of The Telegraph at exactly the moment serious questions are being asked about Abu Dhabi Andy and his UAE links. The optics of delaying this report right now are absolutely terrible. Why is it being delayed? Publish the report.
🚨NEW: Labour Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy is delaying the publication of a report into the UAE's attempt to take over The Telegraph [@Telegraph]
106
1,474
43
4,135
52,185
So you loaded the audience with left-wingers on purpose.
Not true. Fiona Bruce and the team have always made clear that Question Time has robust vetting procedures in place. Everyone who applies to be in the audience is interviewed and has to provide links to their social media accounts. If they don't - they don't get in.
43
234
4,560
45,194
🚨Twelve arrests made following protest in Gosport. …Any arrests for illegally entering the country? Lol - of course not. 🤡🌍 hampshire.police.uk/news/ham…
344
2,447
41
12,528
238,568
Mr Someone retweeted
No, passport may be needed to prove identity on social media so the cops know whose door to knock on at 11:30pm for expressing an opinion the government don’t like.
34
335
6
1,977
18,503