@ChainflowSol
Account based inBulgaria
About this account
- Account based in
- Bulgaria
- Connected via
- Bulgaria App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Pinned Tweet
Most LSTs stack fees: the pool takes one, the validator takes another.
chainSOL doesn't. We return 100% of our commission and MEV to holders, every epoch, on-chain.
ChainflowSol retweeted
Our liquid staking token on @Solana is live 🌞
100% of the commission and MEV earned on chainSOL's stake goes back to holders every epoch.
LST Dashboard: chainsol.chainflow.io/
Also live on @sanctumso: app.sanctum.so/explore/chain…
250ms slots activate at epoch 1037.
Also this week: Two validators went offline this week while the validator process was completely healthy.
Full breakdown 👇
BlockZero returns to London on November 15, part of @Solana Breakpoint community events. Details below👇
BlockZero 2026 is coming to London on Nov 15.
A day for the people running the infrastructure: validators, operators, protocol contributors, and the teams building validator-adjacent tech.
Small by design, attendance is capped and subject to approval.
luma.com/dmxdc394
ChainflowSol retweeted
BlockZero 2026 is coming to London on Nov 15.
A day for the people running the infrastructure: validators, operators, protocol contributors, and the teams building validator-adjacent tech.
Small by design, attendance is capped and subject to approval.
luma.com/dmxdc394
ChainflowSol retweeted
Almost 3 years later we're still running it, still finding the bugs, still think client diversity is worth the cost. 🌞
The @ChainflowPOS @jump_firedancer Solana testnet validator is now running 💃
Almost 3 years later we're still running it, still finding the bugs, still think client diversity is worth the cost. 🌞
The @ChainflowPOS @jump_firedancer Solana testnet validator is now running 💃
ChainflowSol retweeted
Living on the edge isn't easy, yet we do it anyway, because pushing limits is necessary to continue improving Solana's performance and resilience.
And our independence allows us to do it.
Because if we don't, who will?
And if nobody does, progress stops.
In epoch 1033, the SFDP bot hit a bug and unstaked Foundation stake from every validator running full Firedancer, including ours.
That's the third issue we've run into since moving over. It's the cost of being early, and we'd make the same call again.
Our offline signer no longer needs durable nonce accounts.
Replay protection is now a hashchain: each execute advances an on-chain seed via SHA-256. The cold wallet signs a 32-byte digest, never a full transaction.
Unaudited soft launch on our Github 👇 github.com/ChainflowSOL/offl…
This week's Solana Validator talks is out. Full breakdown with linked sources is on Substack.
The summary is here 👇
A delegation framework is a filter, not a leaderboard.
Most stakers sort by yield and stop. However, the higher-leverage questions are elsewhere.
Does this operator run their own hardware, or resell someone else's?
What happens to their commission when rewards compress?
Would the network be more or less concentrated with your stake there?
The last one is the only question a leaderboard cannot answer. 🌞
ChainflowSol retweeted
Hearing rumors @ChainflowSol is running full @jump_firedancer on mainnet
SGP-0001 ratified stake-weighted voting as @Solana's formal decision process.
It also wrote in a delegator override. You can vote against the validator you delegate to, directly, on any proposal.
That mechanism saw use during the SGP-0002 vote itself.
Delegation moves your stake, it no longer has to move your voice.
We wrote an article about how stakers override works on @Solana
Check it out👇
chainflow.io/how-staker-over…
Late, but worth it.
Solana's first governance round: SGP-0002 passed by 0.33%. The proposal defining the governance framework was still pending while proposals ran under it.
Full breakdown available on Substack, the link is in the article👇
We split our SGP-2 vote. 30% yes, 70% no.
A validator vote is not one opinion. It is stake belonging to people who do not all agree, and a binary vote flattens that.
We voted the same way on SIMD-0228.
ChainflowSol retweeted
Proud of our Chainflow team. 🌞
@KavyamSingh has a PR open in @anza_xyz's Agave, splitting gossip conformance into its own crate, keeping production code clean as more harnesses get added.
Small contribution in the right direction.
github.com/anza-xyz/agave/pu…
