Not wrong,
Both are working and 'aligned' in the industry standards as well as @quantnetwork is for programmable money for banks and more -
Tokenization deposits from the biggest banks in the world utilizing Quant just screams success and this is what it's been building for years. $QNT
While Cheqd is for AI Agents and Credentials & beyond.
When AI and Digital IDs are in need for cryptographic verification/proof of whom an issuer or agent is - that's where @cheqd_io can heavily succeed. $CHEQ
Clockyy retweeted
What is $Qnt ?
Picked up by the Clearing House, the 1863 bank group that picked #Qnt
You aren't bullish enough ..
Now read the tweet below and try to imagine selling this under $1000
2. What Is The Clearing House, the 1853 Bank Group That Picked Quant?
coinmarketcap.com/community/… / @CoinMarketCap
We see this playing out as @bigbagz30k has said,
Why are we having rogue agents in an age where we can solve this very issue. That's how you know even the big players still can't seem to keep their work in check.
@OpenAI needs to find ways to mitigate these issues.
Cheqd at the very least can put the identity layer for AI Agents by using did:cheqd that it controls with its own keys, issuers giving it verifiable credentials on who built it, what it can do, and for whom. @cheqd_io
But it can not fully stop rogue agents that's for something built outside the model to do so..
Also with Trust Registries these anchor those issuers on-chain as well as making permissions possible to be revoked. The revocation is tamper evident and public for transparency. Previous credentials can not be restored. $CHEQ
The cheqd network stores the schema, the revocation list, and the payments term. The claim itself stays with the holder in which is the opposite of a central iris-code database like @worldnetwork.
Which is why @cheqd_io is the stronger of the 2 designs beyond the "one time uniqueness stamp".
The holder is keeping the record, while the issuer still gets paid without the need of the underlying biometric template that could be with an operator of whom could get leaked and or reused. $CHEQ $WLD
Quant being down $100 from it's recent spike to me is a good entry point for people who were FOMO'ing just days ago -
That does not mean buy as much as you can at this price but we are coming up on a clear support and if it hold that's good we could go on a new higher leg up.
But if it does not hold this just means we can get more $QNT tokens for cheap 😁
Drop to $200? = 39% off.
Also they have other packages to choose from depending on the needs of the project you are building, Veramo - Credo - ACA-Py - Waltid
docs.cheqd.io/product/sdk/un…
Clockyy retweeted
eIDAS 2.0 and EUDI conversations appear to be shifting gear.
cheqd built a tool to model exactly the question everyone's now asking, link in the comments.
The flip to memes -> utility will happen in a slow and gradual period. ( We are seeing this now )
Most people want to make money quick in this market but come to realize that is just gambling if you want to try turning $100 - $100,000.
Do the research, learn from the past, and look into who is building real world infrastructure.
the projects who survive will ultimately have a big stake in the future.
Not wrong,
Both are working and 'aligned' in the industry standards as well as @quantnetwork is for programmable money for banks and more -
Tokenization deposits from the biggest banks in the world utilizing Quant just screams success and this is what it's been building for years. $QNT
While Cheqd is for AI Agents and Credentials & beyond.
When AI and Digital IDs are in need for cryptographic verification/proof of whom an issuer or agent is - that's where @cheqd_io can heavily succeed. $CHEQ
Clockyy retweeted
First heard of independent verification organisations, or IVOs, from @BriTreece_, (co-founder and president of @fathom_org and executive director of @pactai_org, on a @linuxfoundation webinar launching “Proof of Control” (congrats @triciawang and @aai_society)
"State backed Digital ID systems still tend to rely on centralized issuance, persistent identifiers, & institutional trust anchors" - Cheqd
aka = systems.
The answer to verify those age whom are minors to protect online identity information being stored in centralized databases, is decentralized Identity.
You can prove what is TRUE about you example what age you are without having to reveal any other personal information to tell that source you are that age.
By using VCs ( Verifiable Credentials ) people can show cryptographic 'Proof of Age' without the need to reveal any information regarding documentation numbers, sharing names or DOB etc.
Cheqd has explained the very reason why DeIDs are the answer the "digital age" we have entered and why we need to take safeguards. $CHEQ
As more countries explore age assurance online, one question matters:
How do we protect young people without collecting more personal data than necessary?
Privacy-preserving digital identity could be part of the answer. 👇
cheqd.io/blog/under-16s-offl…
You can say Cheqd already has their foot in the door to the US.
$CHEQ
plus the countless other partners that are building while everybody is silent.
Our partner @AnonyomeLabs has announced a pilot programme with Utah Valley University.
This initiative enables students to test secure digital versions of their student IDs and academic credentials in a mobile wallet environment, running on cheqd.
linkedin.com/posts/anonyome-…