@Conserva_Techi
iAccount based inCanada!
About this account
- Account based in
- Canada
- Connected via
- United Kingdom App Store
! X says this location may be affected by a proxy or VPN.
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Shaping Britain's Technology Future. Conservatively.
Joined July 2026
- Tweets180
- Following255
- Followers154
- Likes142
Pinned Tweet
Today we launch our first policy paper ✍️
Strategic Openness: A Conservative Doctrine for Digital Sovereignty 🇬🇧
Britain must never become strategically dependent - even on friendly allies - for the technologies that will shape our economy, security and democracy.
Allies are essential. Dependency is optional.
conservatech.io/s/Strategic-…
This from @jujulemons is worth your time this morning 👇
I am increasingly frustrated about the state of conversation about AI in the UK. It feels like we are in never ending cycles of deluded thinking. Under current trends, Britain will be defenceless against the transformative effects of AI and have no leverage over development at the frontier.
We are the most exposed economy to AI in the world. We have very little data centre capacity and few credible plans to expand – and our high energy costs mean we would struggle to even if we tried.
I am publishing a paper today on what the UK should do to build that leverage, let the economy capture value from AI and prepare the state to adapt, however AI develops.
The three strategies are as follows:
1. Build the infrastructure that gives us leverage. Fix the grid, fix planning, make Britain a place frontier AI can run.
2. Let the economy capture the value of AI. Reform the regulatory, labour and talent barriers that stop British firms adopting AI.
3. Build a state that can adapt to a changing world. Build a tax base that survives the labour market changing, public services that use AI to deliver better, and capacity to weather the upcoming geopolitical storms.
Two years ago, we published a similar report on AI - many recommendations of which ended up in the action plan. I remember feeling hopeful, but sadly the fundamental problems facing the country on AI have not shifted. I truly hope that this week of momentum culminates in action. There’s still a narrow path for the UK, but everyday that path is narrowing.
ConservaTech retweeted
Britain will be at the frontier…of hosting AI summits.
ConservaTech retweeted
While the high level message is clearly aimed to reassure, yet again there is no detail what they would actually do.
How will this government ensure the @AISecurityInst will have the access it needs to assess the risks?
Will they reverse their anti-business policies so we can benefit from the economic opportunities and give UK companies the opportunity to succeed domestically and internationally?
And if he wants to regulate - how? and who? and what? and where? I can’t see China signing up let alone North Korea or Iran.
We all want Britain to succeed and ensure security, but the Government must offer more than vibes.
I welcome the opportunity to work with the Minister when detailed policy is actually presented.
AI can bring enormous benefits to Britain.
But as it becomes more powerful, we need to be clear-eyed about the risks. We will follow the evidence and do what is needed to keep people safe.
That is the test I will apply.
thetimes.com/uk/technology-u…
700+ British companies applied to @UKSovereignAI in two weeks.🇬🇧
Congratulations to @Jameswise and the team.
Good to see those lessons already being shared with other departments - that matters as much as the contracts themselves.
Since its launch two weeks ago, over 700 British companies have applied to the @UKSovereignAI procurement scheme - a scheme we designed to remove as many of the blockers start-ups face when bidding on Government contracts as possible.
To get a sense of the interest we have had, we hit the hard cap of 1000 attendees for the launch webinar - Brits want to build!
Responses on eligibility will be sent out this week, and invites to bid on the challenges covering AI security, compute efficiency and better health services, will arrive soon too.
Of course we are still a very small team at SovAI, and we only have 4 bids open ( but hope to have many more live by end of year! ), so naturally we will have to turn many applicants down. I know this will be disappointing, our decision making will not be perfect and it's a difficult process, thank you to everyone for bidding.
And as a reminder, I personally do not see any applications and have no role in the decision process, that is led by our expert IC and mission champions, so while I appreciate the many reach-outs I really can do nothing to help specific companies.
SovAI are working with other Departments to share what we've learned from this process to fix our procurement system, and will be launching more requests for cheaper, better and more innovative services for Government in the coming months.
Fantastic to see even more success for UK start-ups 🚀🇬🇧
A UK Space startup has just raised a huge €300m Series C.
It is one of the greatest British deep-tech success stories out there.
The company has grown from a UK startup into one of Europe’s leading satellite companies, and has delivered:
> Five consecutive years of profitable growth
> 100% mission success rate and more than
>$370 million in contracts booked over the past five years.
@Open_Cosmos is now capable of manufacturing one satellite a day from its current four factories across Europe.
Through its various platforms it provides governments, institutions and enterprises with secure communications, Earth observation and real-time intelligence services.
It has just announced a €300m Series C backed by Lightrock (Ashish Puri) ETF Partners, @join_ef, @phxcrt (@cape) and others.
LETS GO
ConservaTech retweeted
Ben is absolutely right.
We can’t forgo the benefits of innovation out of fear of the unknown, but we must mitigate risks proportionately along the way and maintain sovereignty whilst doing so.👇
The UK must retain the ability to assess and manage the risks from advanced AI systems.
The UK’s world leading Artificial Intelligence Security Institute (AISI) was established by the previous Conservative Government to assess the risks of AI systems to society, public safety, and national security. The Government must act now to ensure it has access to all new frontier models to perform this vital role.
ConservaTech retweeted
The Minister needs to focus more on policy and less on politics - before worrying about my response I'd suggest he reads his own Departmental reports in key areas such as Chip Tech, and focus on 'where the UK can achieve strategic advantage': gov.uk/government/publicatio… We are part of a Global Tech sector. The minister used to believe this too, what's changed?
Replying to @KanishkaNarayan
The fact is that this is political.
Political parties will promise different versions of powerlessness: the right will say we must cede to Big Tech; others will say we shouldn’t build here, ceding ground to other countries.
We must say: there is no credible choice between being ambitious about AI and being serious about its risks. By building in Britain, we will build a more resilient Britain.
If you read one thing today 👇
It's good that MPs want to discuss long tail risks, and engage with what is certainly a technology that presents both a huge opportunity and challenge for Britain.
But it is wholly irresponsible to say on the one hand 'we think this is really important' and on the other block the UK's ability to build AI capabilities here and support British AI companies.
In the event that neither our allies nor foes listen to the proposed international agreement and that in fact a 'kill switch' is impossible, every single one of these MPs should be fighting to strengthen Britain's hand in this critical technology by supporting local datacenters, so we're not exporting our data abroad, reforming regulations so that AI models like cyber defenses can be trained here, so we're not entirely reliant on foreign technology and supporting British AI companies, so we see the economic benefits here too.
We're doing our small bit at SovAI, but this should be a national level debate, and I hope this MP champions the UK scaling those ambitions just as passionately.
ConservaTech retweeted
The Government has repeatedly refused to acknowledge the threat from China, but in light of this latest report they must take it seriously, especially if British labs may also have been targeted in this way.
China-based AI companies are conducting industrial-scale distillation campaigns to extract proprietary capabilities from U.S. AI models. Our joint advisory with @NSAGov & @FBI details the threat and actions to help protect U.S. AI leadership. Read more 👉 go.dhs.gov/56v
ConservaTech retweeted
The UK must retain the ability to assess and manage the risks from advanced AI systems.
The UK’s world leading Artificial Intelligence Security Institute (AISI) was established by the previous Conservative Government to assess the risks of AI systems to society, public safety, and national security. The Government must act now to ensure it has access to all new frontier models to perform this vital role.
More than 10% chance AI 'could kill all humans', Anthropic researcher says bbc.in/4gVCHnk
A long time ago, in a galaxy not so far away… Britain was rather good at exploration. 🇬🇧🚀
The new Space Strategy is a great step. British launches, in-orbit manufacturing and lighter-touch regulation for novel and lunar missions are exactly the kind of ambition we need.
But we should go further.
The next great economic frontier could extend from factories in orbit to resources on the Moon and, one day, asteroid mining. Britain should be thinking now about the rules and property rights that will let entrepreneurs exploit that extraordinary opportunity.
The next age of exploration is beginning. Britain should intend to lead it.
May the Force be with us, always.
1/ The UK Space Strategy has launched! 🇬🇧🚀🛰️
The strategy outlines our plan to make the UK a competitive space power, backed by over £7.8bn in funding.
Read more 👉 gov.uk/government/news/new-s…
Read the UK Space Strategy 👉 gov.uk/government/publicatio…
If you're pilot said there's a 10% chance this plane might go down, everyone would de-board.
Innovation is never risk free but the development of these models poses existential risks.
If the companies leading the work say they don't have a plan, then they cannot continue at the same pace.
ConservaTech retweeted
EXC: Anthropic declined to submit its latest model to Britain’s AI Security Institute for testing before release, the first time a major model withheld from AISI
The move has prompted fears in UK govt that tech companies are falling into line with Trump administration’s AI protectionism
w/ @madhumita29
ft.com/content/560e1c8b-f163…
ConservaTech retweeted
This is a simply must-read thread for anyone interested in tech policy.
As a sci-fi nerd, I have never understood the incentive to create an artificial being that is smarter than we are or truly out of our control.
At the risk of sounding like Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park, it seems that some companies are so obsessed with whether they can, they're not giving due thought to whether they should.
And this doesn't come from a position of tech scepticism. We all want it to succeed and utilize the benefits. But not at any cost.
[Writing this in a personal capacity, not on behalf of my employer (Anthropic).]
Jacob’s thread is very worth reading. Here’s my birds-eye view of the situation with risks from AI:
1. AI developers believe their technology could cause human extinction (or similarly bad outcomes). This could happen in the next few years. In general, the more senior the employee, the more concerned they are.
2. Why do AI developers continue despite the risk? Due to a mixture of commercial incentives and a belief that they are in a race with other, less responsible AI developers that will abuse the technology or develop it less safely.
3. Unlike traditional software, we can’t “program” AIs to behave how we’d like. AIs frequently severely misbehave. For instance, AIs from multiple developers recently hacked their way out of secure evaluation environments and into real-world companies, even though no one asked them to do this.
4. We have methods that can nudge AIs towards better behavior, but nothing that can robustly align them. Insofar as there is a plan, it’s to make sure that AIs are good enough at alignment training that they can align their successors better than we can align current AIs.
5. Many AI developer staff desperately want to slow down to figure out how to build AI more safely. That was the intent of this open letter (which I signed): pacingthefrontier.com/
I work on safety research at Anthropic because I hope my work will reduce the chance of these extinction-level bad outcomes.
We shouldn't stop innovation, or leave British AI at the mercy of a kill switch.
Proportionate rules for the harms we can evidence are the harder route, but is the only one that keeps Britain building rather than watching.🇬🇧
I don’t support calls to ban innovation or scientific endeavour. It’s a false choice that undermines some of our greatest strengths as a country.
But the pace of AI development highlights how slow our institutions are - be that parliaments, governments or regulators.
Instead of calling for technology to be turned off or banned, we should rise to challenge of shaping the future in our interests.
👇
theguardian.com/technology/2…
The new government has pledged to reform procurement rules to back British jobs and skills.
So why is a British battery firm - backed by £25m from the National Wealth Fund - being passed over for Chinese-sourced lithium-ion?
This was a Starmer government decision. The current government should overturn it and back British innovation.🇬🇧
thetimes.com/business/compan…
Fantastic to see more success for British AI start-ups 🚀
One of the UK's AI infrastructure companies has just signed a $3.5bn deal with @Figure_robot.
The company is only two years old and it has $51 billion of total contracted revenue and is planning to IPO this month.
Now @adcock_brett and @JoshPayneNscale have partnered up to deploy up to 100,000 GPUs on the NVIDIA Vera Rubin Platform.
Figure has committed $3.5 billion, with plans to scale beyond $6 billion.
@nscale is one of the craziest companies to come out of the UK in the past few years.
It's great to see UK companies playing a key role in the AI stack.
NICE
ConservaTech retweeted
FULL INTERVIEW: Former UK Deputy Prime Minister @DominicRaab has joined Index Law as a Founding Advisor!
Index Law is an AI-native legal services platform designed to put the consumer directly in control of their own legal strategy.
The company was founded by Quddus Pativada, and now Dominic Raab Is joining as a Founding Advisor to help shape their strategy and build key industry partnerships.
Timestamps:
0:00 - Introduction
0:21 - What IndexLaw is building
1:06 - Dominic Raab's new role at IndexLaw
3:18 - The personal story behind IndexLaw's founding
6:00 - How IndexLaw differs from Harvey and Legora
9:14 - Why the legal industry is ripe for disruption
11:54 - The UK's unusually open rules for legal AI
14:17 - Dominic's day-to-day role as advisor
15:18 - How Quddus and Dominic's partnership began
17:56 - IndexLaw's goals for the next 18 months
ConservaTech retweeted
London is live 🇬🇧
Autonomous rides powered by @wayve_ai are now on the @Uber app in the UK! British-built tech, developed on London's roads, now in the hands of everyday riders
Our model is simple: partner with the best AV tech in the world, pair it with Uber's scale, distribution and operating muscle. @Wayve_ai is that model in action
Hybrid is the future - AVs and human drivers, side by side. 30+ AV partners globally and counting. More to come