CLARIFICATIONS & CORRECTIONS TO THIS THREAD For accuracy, please read these points alongside the posts above: • The £282,826.66 figure covers 20 Electoral Commission cash-sponsorship entries recording receipt in 2026, checked through 23rd September. It is not the Fabian Society’s complete 2026 income. Four entries carry aggregation flags, so “20 entries” should not be read as “20 individual bank transfers”. • The July–August receipts shown separately are already included in that total. Their September publication dates are not their receipt dates. The 2024/25 accounts and funding figures relate to an earlier financial year. • Pierce Protocols and Joe Hage appear against equal amounts in different annual reports. That does not establish duplicate reporting or duplicate payment. The underlying payment dates and accounting treatment remain unconfirmed. • The £7,651 difference is an unresolved comparison between the sum of the listed project-funding amounts and the accompanying stated total. It does not, by itself, establish missing money, fraud or other wrongdoing. An explanation could resolve the difference. • My people register is a research snapshot compiled for 12 September 2026. It contains 58 records: 43 with explicit membership declarations and 15 with institutional or employment connections. I should not have described all 43 declarations as “dated” some entries are undated, and a retrieval date is not a declaration date. • The ministerial membership examples refer to the July 2026 declarations. Employment, committee roles and contributions to publications are distinct relationships and should not be treated as interchangeable evidence of membership. • Funding and declared affiliations do not, by themselves, establish control over politicians, purchased influence or improper conduct. This thread does not establish those things. • I also need to verify the status of the requests mentioned in the final post. Please treat my statement that requests had been sent as pending that need checking. Finally, two posts were accidentally labelled 4/10, making 11 numbered posts. The source numbers refer to the evidence documents, not the thread numbering. I welcome specific, evidenced corrections and responses from those named.