Pinned Tweet
To all of you who kindly did this, thank you, from the bottom of my heart.
God, in His ineffable wisdom, willed otherwise.
I will be away for a while. Be not-terribly-gruesome to each other.
You don't love socialism. You love the version that was imagined by people who've never wanted for anything and have never had to stand in line waiting for the week's ration of toilet paper.
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
Actually I hate the version I experienced as a child standing in breadlines with my parents, the version I experienced begging my parents to buy me fruit they couldn’t afford, and the version I experienced that kept my parents from practicing their Jewish faith.
Hey look, a Protestant has thoughts from the Cliff's Notes on the Council of Trent.
A lot of the popular-level Roman Catholic apologists today are actually quite dull on the subject of Eucharistic Sacrifice when compared with the vast majority of Roman theologians after the Council of Trent.
For example, they commonly just say that "the Mass is a re-presentation of the sacrifice of the Cross," or simply "applies the sacrifice of the Cross" while being unaware that most confessional Protestants also agreed to this without any difficulty.
The real issue was that Roman Catholic theology has always historically held to the idea that a real immolation of the sacrificial victim is necessary and essential to the nature of a proper and external sacrifice. Without it, you merely have an oblation---but not a sacrifice.
The views held by the Catholic Answers bros are actually out of step with even Trent itself, since they hold to something more like the view of Gabriel Vazquez or perhaps Maurice de la Taille, who were criticized on this very issue by other prominent authors, such as Emmanuel Doronzo.
If you want the best survey possible, check out L'Idée du sacrifice de la messe by Marius Lepin. It is a 900-page study of all the different theories, and ultimately comes to the conclusion that the majority of them are wrong and inconsistent in explaining how some immolation of Christ occurs in the Mass.
3
190
I seriously doubt the second part. Not disbelieve, dude has a thing for that.
Man of Tomorrow Plot: Superman A ‘Simp’ Again, Wonder Woman A Lesbian (Exclusive)
cosmicbook.news/man-of-tomor…
1
2
322
The End and the Death was the rare example of more-than-competent writing in a Warhammer novel.
I know this isn't from those three books, but it brought the final arrival of the Ultramarines fleet to mind.
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
"YOU'VE GOT A DM"
Manhattan attorney strikes up Twitter relationship with fellow New Yorker, S3xyAmy92747. He invests in her crypto startup and they send each other several photos; all are AI or stolen from various IG accounts. They set up a meeting at a cool coffeeshop, but S3xyAmy92747 cancels at the last moment. The attorney discovers that S3xyAmy92747 was arrested in Lahore for the crypto scheme and is actually a 43-year-old guy named Bilal. In a crazy twist, the attorney is actually a 38-year-old widow named Zainab who also lives in Lahore and her "investments" used a stolen credit card. She busts Bilal out of jail, they flee to Islamabad, and both create new Twitter accounts advertising S3xyCoin and fleece actual attorneys in NYC. Then they kiss. #fin
A ‘YOU’VE GOT MAIL’ remake is officially in the works.
(deadline.com/2026/11/youve-g…)
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
Is anyone in Ireland engaging with the fact that their economy is entirely dependent on being a tax haven for other countries' corporations.
That sort of position becomes cataclysmically vulnerable to actions of people they can't control/influence if public opinion goes toxic.
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
I don’t like Biden but my default policy response here is we start airstrikes immediately on the attackers
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
If you believe that some people are 6's, some people 8's, and everyone is looking for a 10, you might be interested in my newsletter this week. I reviewed Paul Eastwick's book Bonded by Evolution, which argues that compatibility matters more than objective mate value
Rogue was a last love letter to the fans, and Unity was an admission that they had no idea what to do with the franchise going forward.
Happy Anniversary to Assassin's Creed Unity and Rogue!🎉
Who remembers the history between Arno and Shay?😔
#AssassinsCreed
2
1
208
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
The market isn't driving volatility anymore. Volatility is driving the market. And Wall Street is trapped in the feedback loop.
zerohedge.com/the-market-ear…
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
More cowbell is sure to energize those missing 2026 voters.
“This new initiative’s organizers want to see a Republican Party aligned to the conservatism that Vance, a close ally of the Claremont Institute, has come to represent.”
politico.com/news/2026/11/09…
The open, repeat adulterer is embracing Donatism, mirabile dictu
Sean Hannity announced on his Fox News program that he has left the Catholic Church. beliefnet.com/columnists/ido…
12
436
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
Extreme Unfalsifiability Alert
The midterms did not prove the system worked. They did not show that the institutions held.
"Let me ask you: You’re on a plane and one of the engines explodes. The plane makes an emergency landing. Is the lesson, “We landed, so the plane works”?"
thebulwark.com/p/the-dark-le…
In the first Trump administration, a lot -- not all, but a lot -- of what would change from ideologically opposed to Trump to Professional NeverTrump slammed DeSantis for being nice to Trump and ordinary Republicans who staffed Trump's administration.
Yeah.
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
Villains RW sympathizes with: tragic figures, men who want to fix the world, tyrants who desire order, men who want to build a civilization often at the expense of other human virtues.
Villains LW sympathizes: horrendous bug monsters that kill maim and torture humans as an instinct, incapable of building civilization only destroy, incapable of virtues.
(((Not That Crown, Maybe))) retweeted
For the last decade, the new GOP establishment has been MAGA and the insurgent “New Right” crowd that now appears best positioned to lead the party out of the Trump era.
For the most part, I think that’s been a good thing. The pre-Trump GOP establishment had become lethargic, lazy, and out of touch with voters. It couldn’t lay a finger on Democrats during the Obama era, blamed its failures on “changing demographics,” and essentially threw in the towel. Change was needed.
But now I worry that the new GOP establishment—including plenty of overconfident Republican operatives around my age who, even in overwhelming defeat, like to sit around packing Zyns and competing to see who can drop the most “based” take—is over-indexing on the losses Republicans suffered among young men in the midterms. And I worry that they're becoming similarly inclined to handwave away the party’s broader political problems by blaming changing demographics.
I’ve seen a lot of self-reflection on the timeline about the drop-off among young men in the days since the midterm shellacking. I get it. Many of us are young men ourselves. It’s hard for us to understand why others in our demographic would stay home or break for Democrats. But it’s worth remembering that 2024 was the aberration in terms of GOP support from this group, not 2026.
None of this is to say Republicans shouldn’t focus on winning back young men. But Republicans lost ground among almost every demographic in 2026. Focusing exclusively or disproportionately on young men—and convincing ourselves that the way to win them back is to get even more racist on the internet or sound a little more like Nick Fuentes—would be a major mistake.
I’m much more worried about the middle-aged white suburbanites increasingly exhausted by Trump who defected to Adam Hamilton in Kansas. Or the Hispanics across the Rio Grande Valley who voted enthusiastically and overwhelmingly for Trump just two years ago, only to jump off the bandwagon and vote for James Talarico this cycle.
Those voters represent a much bigger problem for Republicans than a largely imagined epidemic of “based” young dudes defecting to support socialist-aligned, Islamist-sympathetic extremists on the left like Abdul El-Sayed.
If the new GOP establishment responds to its first major electoral setback by retreating into demographic fatalism and doubling down on the very cultural and political instincts that alienate everyone outside its own online bubble, it risks becoming exactly the kind of failed establishment it replaced.
Percentage of Republican voters who voted for Democratic candidates (Party ID)
US Senate
🟦Kansas: Adam Hamilton 12%
🟦South Carolina: Annie Andrews 11%
🟦Texas: James Talarico 11%
🟦North Carolina: Roy Cooper 10%
🟦Louisiana: Jamie Davis 9%
🟦Georgia: Jon Ossoff 8%
🟦Florida: Angie Nixon 7%
🟦Iowa: Josh Turek 7%
🟦Maine: Troy Jackson 7%
🟦Mississippi: Scott Colom 6%
🟦Alaska: Mary Peltola 5%
🟦Michigan: Abdul El-Sayed 5%
🟦Minnesota: Peggy Flanagan 4%
Source: CNN exit poll
Pulled my kids' lists from elementary and middle school for THE LAST EIGHTEEN YEARS and yeah it's dudes all the way down








































