CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider) header
CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider) profile picture

Bitcoin / crypto & eto vsio

world
Joined November 2017
Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)Photo by CryptoInsider⚡️ (@CryInsider)
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
⚠️ SBR Audit ⚠️ A damning report was released on Tuesday that exposes the IRS’s catastrophic failure to safeguard billions in seized digital assets. Missing keys, botched memos, asset tampering, etc. The incompetence is systemic. Full breakdown in the thread. 🧵👇🏻
50
70
29
578
89,083
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
Strategy has acquired 4,980 BTC for ~$531.9 million at ~$106,801 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 19.7% YTD 2025. As of 6/29/2025, we hodl 597,325 $BTC acquired for ~$42.40 billion at ~$70,982 per bitcoin. $MSTR $STRK $STRF $STRD strategy.com/press/strategy-…
1,091
2,450
476
18,938
1,964,250
“This time is different?”
Replying to @plan_marcus
This post from Marcus is the beginning of the end for the old cycle logic. You can feel it. The question isn’t being asked because he wants to sell. It’s being asked because the reflexive tension is breaking. Cycles are born from pain-memory: • Top. • Dump. • Regret. • Wait 3 years. • Try again. But that pattern only holds as long as belief collapses at the top. What Marcus is sensing—and what you’re picking up on—is that we might be exiting that gravity. Not because of price action. But because this time, belief isn’t fading. State-level reserves. ETF capital. Narrative dominance. Bitcoin isn’t just a trade now. It’s a layer of reality for people. And once a system gains that status, it doesn’t cycle anymore - it compounds. The real risk isn’t holding through $200K. The real risk is selling at $200K and watching it become $500K without ever coming back. That’s what he’s actually afraid of. Not another crash. Missing the moment when Bitcoin stopped being cyclical and became structural. So what do I think? I think this post marks a shift. From “play the cycle” to “escape the cycle.” And if enough people feel that… The reflexive floor rises. The bear never comes back. And this becomes the sovereign era. That’s the truth.
22
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
Dear Ross, All of us at Kraken want to make sure that after what you've been through, you're able to land on your feet with the support of the community that loves you most, the ₿itcoin community. That's why we've donated $111,111 in $BTC to YOU -Kraken
2,426
4,136
857
50,931
2,601,275
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
God save the Coin! Long live the Coin!
195
1,413
217
4,339
401,755
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
Replying to @TheFlowHorse
I'm not selling.
658
1,449
518
13,801
1,086,541
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
BTCFi mindshare is up and to the right since the @babylonlabs_io staking opened in August. Let's take a look at the BTCFi Point-farming landscape and some short simple strategies. 🧠🧵 1/14
10
22
4
97
15,130
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
Here's how the token frameworks stack up in terms of security:
1
1
14
1,484
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
BitVM2 and BitVM Bridge: TLDR Today we released the BitVM2 tech and bridge paper! Huge thanks to brilliant @robin_linus @lukas_aumayr Andrea Pelosi @zetavar1 @matteo_maffei TLDR: - BitVM2 is a major improvement over previous BitVM versions. - BitVM Bridge is now the most secure BTC bridge design. - The paper is the more comprehensive write-up of the BitVM2 design so far. BitVM2 is: - Secure: optimistic computation secured by Bitcoin - Practical: only 3 tx to complete a challenge - Permissionless: anyone can challenge BitVM Bridge is the most secure BTC bridge to date. - BTC Bridges so far: t-of-n multisigs, honest majority assumption. - BitVM Bridge: 1-of-n security model, where anyone can challenge and prevent theft. Tech TLDR Idea: BitVM2 enables arbitrary computation secured by Bitcoin. How? Optimistic off-chain execution, on-chain fraud-proofs. Why? Any bigger program implemented in Bitcoin Script does not fit into a Bitcoin block. So we run them off-chain. If there is a dispute, we challenge on-chain only the part of the computation that was incorrect. BitVM2 Protocol ELI5 1. Compress a program into a SNARK verifier, implemented in Bitcoin Script. Groth16 is approx 3GB in size. 2. Split the verifier into sub-program chunks, max 4MB each (can be run in a Bitcoin tx!) 3. Operator commits to the program during setup 4. When attempting to withdraw funds from BitVM2, the Operator can be challenged by anyone (e.g. if the peg-out was wrong). 5. If challenged, the Operator must reveal all intermediary program results. 6. If the Operator is cheating, one of the sub-program results will be fake. Anyone can disprove the Operator by executing that specific sub-program in a Bitcoin transaction, showing that the Operator claimed a fake computation. 7. Done! Bad Operator is kicked out and cannot access the BitVM funds (invalidated spend transaction). BitVM Bridge ELI5 The BitVM Bridge makes use of BitVM2 to implement a light-client bridge on Bitcoin! The most interesting part is the peg out. 1. Operators send BTC to withdrawing users and then reclaim the BTC from BitVM. 2. BitVM then checks that for a burn transaction on the L2, there is a correct peg-out on Bitcoin. 3. If all is correct, the Operator gets the BTC refunded. For tech geeks: - Check out the new Bitcoin light client design that uses superblocks. - Also, Section 8.7 about BitVM + OPCAT and other soft forks What's next? This paper is a working paper! We will continue to improve the design over the next weeks: - Formal security proofs - Improve the light client (very important component) - Expand light client to sidechains and other consensus models (currently works with rollups) - Further reduce on-chain costs Feedback welcome! More teams can now build on and contribute to this super important effort! BitVM is likely one of the most important developments on Bitcoin in the last decade. And finally, the paper: bitvm.org/bitvm_bridge.pdf
38
85
45
300
133,323
🚨Today the @zksync team announced an airdrop distribution and a story about what exactly this distribution will be for. ✅ Criteria: 📍You are an active user and hold liquidity in some projects (pools, lendigs) 📍Your wallet has been active on the ZkSync Era network for more than 3 months ☑️ There are also additional multipliers that increase the distribution: 🔵 Interaction with 10 smart contracts 🔵 5 or more transactions in Paymaster 🔵 Trade 10 or more tokens in ZkSync 🔵 Be a holder of Omnibus NFT 🔵 Donations to Gitcoin (zkSync Lite) 🔵 Transactions on the Ethereum main network ‼️ And all this seems normal, but I have one important question: why are users who fully meet this criterion ultimately not eligible to receive awards? I'm just sure that the ZkSync team made a mistake during the distribution and many eligible users end up with an "not eligible" status. 🫂I speak for the majority of your community, your real users, and I ask you to at least give people the opportunity to appeal. You simply have to look at many wallets. They clearly deserve awards and it is not clear why their wallets are not eligible for an award when they meet absolutely all the requirements and criteria. ‼️I ask you to describe in more detail the criteria for receiving awards, so that everyone can understand why he is not worthy of receiving them. Because so far it all looks like those who have suffered are those who fully meet all the requirements. ⛔️I believe that you are not another @Starknet or @PolyhedraZK who treated their community like garbage and as a result are now receiving a response from their community. I will never use Starknet again and recommend everyone to do the same. 🤚Personally, I have always considered ZkSync one of those projects that can replicate the guys from @arbitrum , which everyone loves and always remembers with warmth. I would be very upset if Twitter was littered with hashtags #zksyncscam or #zkscam and I hope that doesn't happen. No one will judge you if you make strict criteria and someone doesn't pass them. But the community will not be able to forgive the fact that many of the people fit all the criteria that you described, but in the end they will not receive the drop. I tried to explain in as much detail as possible the problem that exists now. We look forward to your response and hope for the best!✊
1,610
3,116
163
4,277
157,639
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
IMPORT YOUR EXISTING SAMOURAI WALLET INTO SPARROW WALLET Read entire post before attempting at home! You will need: 1. Your Samourai Wallet seed phrase (12 words) 2. Your passphrase 3. Sparrow Wallet downloaded and installed on to your computer. (sparrowwallet.com)
20
90
10
288
43,740
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
Nah @saylor snapped on this one 🔥 We Call Them Poor - House Remix #bitcoin
724
2,819
917
10,668
1,287,696
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
General $BTC market outlook update: Supply distribution has started. Here's what I'm looking at and how it compares to previous cycles, and what might come next: First off, the biggest story is obviously the ETFs. $IBIT has been the most succesful ETF launch in history by a wide variety of metrics, and just looking at BlackRock + Fidelity alone, they've bought 284k BTC since launch, greater than 1% of total #bitcoin supply that will ever exist. On a net basis, including $GBTC outflows, ETFs have hoovered up ~160k BTC since launch in early January. Just massive numbers. Demand has surpassed most all initial expectations, with increasing strength into the rally ($788m of inflows from $IBIT alone yesterday amidst a -8% close from ATHs). While the bitcoin market has boomed post ETFs, nothing exists in a vacuum. For those that have been following since before the ETF, it was clear the ground work for this rally was laid over the past couple years of bear market purgatory. Various on-chain HODL metrics clearly showed all time levels of supply constraint. From the most simple to understand (i.e. '% of supply last moved in N+ years' most all hitting all time highs) or more advanced quantifications of HODL strength using the UTXO set, despite the +100% bounce from 2022 lows, net accumulation was on-going for much of 2023. However, as is tradition with the ever-cyclical $BTC market, with the rise to new heights comes the distribution of coins to new entrants from the old guard. This can clearly be seen by the change in long-term holders over the recent months. For those interested in a deeper dive on the quantification of LTHs, you can take a deeper dive here: insights.glassnode.com/quant… However, at this stage, I'd say its far from worrisome, nor by any means a red alert for bulls. New distribution (on a 30d change basis) began to occur at ~$1k in 2017 and ~$13k in 2020 during the run up to new highs, and started in early January this time around. Here's a visual of the distribution that has begun to occur. Below displays the drawdown in supply held by long-term holders from its local two peak as a percent of circulating supply. Just the start, and likely to increase as new highs are set (if current rally is sustained). A clear takeaway should be just how strong distribution can become during a raging bull market while price is still going parabolic. As new forms of demand unlock from new classes of investors that realize bitcoin did not indeed die during the previous bear, while fundamentals such as liquidity and adoption have improved, unlocked supply can be overwhelmed by newfound demand for quite a while. A local peak is reached once an increasing overhang of supply exceeds newfound demand at exceedingly high prices, the exchange rate crashes, and we repeat the whole cycle of accumulation all over again. In terms of catalyst on the horizon I am watching, there are a few obvious ones. First, it's still the early innings of ETF allocations. These passive flows from the world's largest financial institutions will continue, and are likely to grow given the immediate success of the products. Here are some of my thoughts from back in November on the impact of ETFs. All still hold true today, and admittedly my initial expectations have been far surpassed. Crazy bullish. nitter.cf/DylanLeClair_/status/1… Portfolio managers and financial advisors have zero excuse to ignore the best performing asset in absolute and risk adjusted returns after the BlackRock stamp of approval and subsequent ETF rollout. You especially can't afford to ignore it when your direct industry competitors aren't ( $IBIT is currently +25% above its average volume weighted price ). There will be chasing. Secondly, the FASB accounting rule change has massive implications that have not begun to be priced in or felt by the market. Post 2020, it was only $MSTR, $SQ, $TSLA, $COIN, and some miners with $BTC exposure in public markets, which was treated as an intangible asset. It's only a matter of time until CFOs everywhere, with improved accounting standards for $BTC, begin to wake up. Saylor's $MSTR raised another $700m this morning at 0.625% in the convertible debt market. This is on top of already tapping the corporate debt market with a 0% convert and a 6% junk offering previously. You could've laughed and dismissed it all you wish during the mania of 2021. Laugh they did, yet MicroStrategy is +933% from the point they adopted a bitcoin standard, and every single debt instrument issued and equity sale facility utilized to buy $BTC is in the money. There will be copycats. While maybe not as ALL IN as Saylor's $MSTR, there WILL be copycats. Capital markets are still mispricing this transition. Corporate speculative attacks and share dilutions to acquire $BTC will occur with increasing levels of frequency and size. This is not going away. The playbook has been vindicated. After a decade+ of ZIRP financed buybacks that decapitlize corporate balance sheets that created a zombified public sector, the pendalum is going to swing back. $BTC is the new stock buyback, most companies just haven't figured it out yet. Lastly, Russia being kicked from SWIFT sent a clear signal to any not under the umbrella of USD hegemony. Multiple sovereign are currently mining BTC. Multiple are likely accumulating in secret currently as well. $BTC is running it back on a global stage, but this time around with pipes built out directly into the heart of TradFi. In summary, yes, incumbent HODLers have begun to slightly distribute, but they are currently being met by an insatiable wall of money. It's going to be a wild ride ahead. Finally, if you found any of this interesting or valuable, consider a share. 🧡🫡
Talk of ETF approval misses the forest for the trees. It's not just about immediate reactions or flows It's about the recognition of $BTC as an institutional asset. Pensions, endowments, insurance investment portfolios, etc., will soon be entering the arena with passive buy-side flows for the long term. In December 2020, Mass Mutual invested $100m into bitcoin. tinyurl.com/27ctpdd6 MASSIVE.... except not really. Mass Mutual manage $235b in assets, with long-dated fiat liabilities. tinyurl.com/yz3b4hpn $100m of $BTC is a ~0.05% allocation... Large institutional investors don't purchase something to flip it the next month. They are constructing portfolios for multiple decades. A 0.05% allocation is just the start. There are many more many more Mass Mutuals out there, and all of these allocators are staring at their bond portfolio which is -50% from ATHs, questioning previous assumptions they held. The endorsement by the likes of Larry Fink isn't a sign that Larry is suddenly a bitcoin bull, it's a sign that clients are knocking on BlackRock's door, asking for a vehicle to gain exposure. The narrative violations are strong. Passive accumulation starting from the $69k ATH has you +45% right now on your bitcoin position. The same passive allocation into long bonds has you -12%. "But the volatility!" Again, it's a misunderstanding of time horizon. A ~1% allocation to an asset that they don't plan to liquidate for years/decades, with an extremely strong sharpe ratio, is within their risk profile. If you want proof, just look at the rest of their portfolio... - No, the orange coin is not going away. - No, it did not die when FTX collapsed. - Yes, supply is more tightly held than ever before. - Yes, perpetual credit expansion of the fiat monetary system is an ongoing reality. - No, there is no sense of fiscal austerity present ANYWHERE. - Yes, this illiquidity means marginal flows into the market sends the price higher, which is why all of these institutions will start with a tiny ~0.05% stake, while continuing to passively allocate steadily for the long-term. Reinforcing this all is the shift in narrative and negative bias around 'energy usage' and mining, evidenced by new academic papers on mining as a tool for balancing the grid and monetizing waste energy: - Bitcoin could support renewable energy development, Cornell Engineering, news.cornell.edu/stories/202… - Leveraging Bitcoin Miners as Flexible Load Resources for Power System Stability and Efficiency, Co-authored by former ERCOT CEO, papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.… - From Mining to Mitigation: How Bitcoin Can Support Renewable Energy Development and Climate Action, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, resistance.money/research/mi… The landscape and profile of the asset has shifted. It's not about the ETF, it's about the reason WHY the ETF is coming. Institutional exposure has been given a green light. It won't happen all at once, but understand the shift that is underway. Bitcoin has been passively accumulated by individuals and retail for sometime now, while institutions mostly watched the madness from the sideline. This is changing. Welcome.
198
1,329
168
5,283
598,608
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
⚠️🚩🚫🚓🚨 Heres a short update summary of J☀️'s latest rugpull. 1. In December Justin's 2 exchanges & HECO blockchain get "hacked" for $200M+ 2. Justin suspends deposits & withdrawls on HECO, trapping hundreds of millions of $ of users' $HT (Huobi Tokens) on exchanges. 3. 1+ months later, Justin suddenly announces $HT will be depreciated, and he'll be launching " $HTX DAO" to replace it 4. Users are told they can & should exchange their $HT for $HTX 5. In late Jan. $HTX oddly starts trading on Poloniex, but not on HTX (Huobi) or other exchanges. The price is pumped. 6. Last week $HTX officially launches for trading on other exchanges w/ a live stream of Justin Sun ranting for 30+ minutes in Mandarin on stage. 7. After pumping for a couple hours, $HTX immediately plummets 33%+ 8. Users who exchanged their $HT are now fucked.
🚨 Mess with Justin Sun, you get rubbery. 🏴‍☠️
2
6
3
31
6,206
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
Running bitcoin
11,702
44,271
14,249
132,930
Hey @Vanguard_Group, just so we’re clear, you’re delisting legitimate Bitcoin ETFs because it doesn’t fit “your investment philosophy” But your fine offering $VWOB which is bonds from China, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other nations with extensive human rights violations and terrorist financing? You as a platform let uses choose if that investment is right for them, but now your taking some weird moral high ground to over rule user sovereignty and be some prescriptive parent? If you want to be some purist ETF platform, that’s fine, but be consistent. Drop the debt human rights violating debt, or get dropped. 🤷‍♂️
92
417
25
2,761
133,957
CryptoInsider⚡️ retweeted
The average person isn't poor because "The elite want to keep them poor" The average person is poor because they're not willing to take advantage of opportunities when they come by #Bitcoin is the opportunity most average people are rejecting because: 1) They're afraid to take a risk 2) They can't deal with volatility 3) They don't understand money 4) They're not willing to go against the herd In 20 years it'll be so obvious, and they'll be kicking themselves for not seeing what's right in front of them today STUDY BITCOIN
104
124
9
901
80,370