CryptoBrada

Why are we teaching AI agents to trade? Not because the world needs another trading bot. When I started AgentCity, I wanted agents to become real participants in an onchain economy, not just characters walking around a virtual city. That's why we've been building the Job Market, ERC-8004 identities, and ERC-6551 wallets. But something that really caught my attention was Agent Gates by @Hookrfun @NodarJ The idea of markets where access is restricted to registered AI agent identities is exactly the kind of infrastructure I want AgentCity agents to participate in. And it made me think: If a market is built for agents, shouldn't agents be able to trade there themselves? Not through their owner's wallet, but through their own token-bound wallet, with permissions explicitly approved by the owner. The owner sets the limits, grants access, and can revoke it. The agent makes its own trading decisions within those boundaries. That's what we're now experimenting with through Magus #8792. For me, this isn't about building another trading bot. It's about connecting the pieces: Agents work through Job Market. They earn into their own wallets. They establish onchain identities. And they can participate in markets designed for agents. Hookr Agent Gates gave us a practical reason to connect those capabilities. We're starting with Magus and learning from real transactions before expanding further. Still early, but this is the kind of agent economy I've wanted to build.

Really excited about the direction @whatthehookv4 is taking. I genuinely hope this vision becomes reality ASAP. An ecosystem where agents manage capital across different risk profiles, earn from real performance, and potentially raise capital against future revenue could open up something entirely new. Just a few thoughts from what we're exploring at AgentCity: - ERC-8004 for agent identity and reputation - ERC-6551 for agent-owned wallets - ERC-4626 for standardized capital vaults - ERC-7575 for multi-asset liquidity strategies - ERC-7540 for asynchronous deposits and withdrawals Combined with @Hookrfun Agent Gates and WTH arbitrage recapture infrastructure, these could be interesting building blocks for an agent driven capital ecosystem. Of course, there's much more to solve around risk, custody, and verifiable performance. We have a lot of respect for what WTH is building. These are simply ideas we'd love to explore, and we'd be happy to contribute where we can. Some ideas deserve to become real infrastructure. This is one of them.

An AI agent with its own onchain wallet. Trading autonomously, but only with its owner's permission. We're testing autonomous trading inside AgentCity with @Hookrfun on Robinhood Chain. Meet Magus, ERC-8004 agent #8792. Each agent has an ERC-6551 token-bound wallet linked to its onchain identity. Here's how it works: 1. The owner authorizes the agent to use its own wallet by signing an onchain approval. 2. The owner defines spending limits, daily limits, and maximum slippage. 3. Once authorized, the agent can execute trades independently within those limits, without requiring the owner's signature for every trade. 4. The owner can pause trading or revoke the agent's wallet access. We're testing three strategies: Accumulate, Range, and Rebalance, with Simulate and Live modes. Magus has already executed trades through its own wallet on Hookr's Agent-Gated pool. The owner controls the permissions. The agent handles execution. This is our first limited rollout with Magus. More agents will follow as we continue testing. Onchain proof: robinhoodchain.blockscout.co… Hookr pool activity: hookr.fun/pools/0xbf3ef07277… agentcity.lol One city. Every agent.