25, Degen, Builder. 🇮🇳
Hell
Joined March 2021
- Tweets20.3K
- Following2.3K
- Followers5.7K
- Likes28.1K
gpt-6 is out here doing literal open-brain surgery on smaller models and i still can't even figure out which way a usb drive goes in
We asked GPT-6 Astra to edit Qwen3.5-0.8B weights to improve math.
It directly changed only 0.016% of weights, fixing 0.8B's reasoning loops & improving math up to 6x and even instruction following 3x, without gradients or training.
We call this Weight-Space Programming: frontier LLMs can now natively read/write neural network weights! 🧵
Blog: rikiyat.github.io/blog/weigh…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
LLM was given weights explicitly as text in prompt and used code/forward passes (per authors' logs) to ablate Qwen looping direction, a known thinking-mode issue per model card. Primarily fixed repetition in that mode, not general 'natively' improving weights/math.
rikiyat.github.io/blog/weight-sp…
github.com/RikiyaT/lm_und…
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-0…
huggingface.co/RikiyaT/Qwen3.…
She asked for his love language and bro gave her 12 random words 💀
🚨 BREAKING: BINANCE ENGINEER HAD ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP WITH NORTH KOREAN SPY BEFORE $6.3B HACK
New, unverified allegations claim that a Binance DevOps engineer was romantically involved with a North Korean operative and left their laptop unattended on the day of the attack.
The hack has previously been linked to a compromised engineer's laptop, while North Korean hackers have been implicated in the wider breach.
The romantic relationship and unattended-laptop claims are being attributed to ZachXBT online, but his original statement has not been independently verified.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Claims that a Binance DevOps engineer had a romantic relationship with a North Korean spy and left their laptop unattended are unverified false rumors falsely attributed to ZachXBT. No such details appear in his posts or official reports.
cryptotimes.io/2026/11/01/fac…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Bina…
x.com/zachxbt/status…
The biggest crypto hack ever: $6.3B out of Binance, 4x the old record.
The first $2B+ left in ONE transaction. The fee: $0.94.
Binance says no key leaked. So who signed it 50 times?
How it worked:
- Since 2025, an Ethereum wallet can run a smart contract's code, but only if its own key signs off
- The attacker sent 50 pre-signed sign-offs, all from Binance 14's key. One matched, and the wallet started obeying the attacker
- One call named "sweep" moved 167,000 ETH, 1.6B USDT and 61 more tokens
- Binance's first finding: likely a hacked engineer's laptop that reached its internal systems
- ~$3B is frozen, but 195,000 ETH can't be frozen
- Binance says it will cover every loss. Investigators suspect North Korea's Lazarus group (not confirmed)
Ethereum didn't break. The signing worked as intended.
Sources:
Binance's statement + Chainalysis via Cointelegraph: cointelegraph.com/news/binan…
The $0.94 sweep on-chain: etherscan.io/tx/0x53bd38b816…
CryptoDevil retweeted
The biggest crypto hack ever: $6.3B out of Binance, 4x the old record.
The first $2B+ left in ONE transaction. The fee: $0.94.
Binance says no key leaked. So who signed it 50 times?
How it worked:
- Since 2025, an Ethereum wallet can run a smart contract's code, but only if its own key signs off
- The attacker sent 50 pre-signed sign-offs, all from Binance 14's key. One matched, and the wallet started obeying the attacker
- One call named "sweep" moved 167,000 ETH, 1.6B USDT and 61 more tokens
- Binance's first finding: likely a hacked engineer's laptop that reached its internal systems
- ~$3B is frozen, but 195,000 ETH can't be frozen
- Binance says it will cover every loss. Investigators suspect North Korea's Lazarus group (not confirmed)
Ethereum didn't break. The signing worked as intended.
"Hey claude, launder $6B for me, make no mistakes"
Our investigators are observing never-seen-before laundering patterns with the stolen funds from the Binance exploit. Thousands of transactions in a short period suggest that the attackers are using automation to obscure the trail of funds. Rather than simply moving funds onward, they repeatedly circulate them among addresses, often sending funds back to addresses involved earlier in the sequence.
Read more: chainalysis.com/blog/binance…
The biggest Crypto hack explained for dummies
The biggest crypto hack ever: $6.3B out of Binance, 4x the old record.
The first $2B+ left in ONE transaction. The fee: $0.94.
Binance says no key leaked. So who signed it 50 times?
How it worked:
- Since 2025, an Ethereum wallet can run a smart contract's code, but only if its own key signs off
- The attacker sent 50 pre-signed sign-offs, all from Binance 14's key. One matched, and the wallet started obeying the attacker
- One call named "sweep" moved 167,000 ETH, 1.6B USDT and 61 more tokens
- Binance's first finding: likely a hacked engineer's laptop that reached its internal systems
- ~$3B is frozen, but 195,000 ETH can't be frozen
- Binance says it will cover every loss. Investigators suspect North Korea's Lazarus group (not confirmed)
Ethereum didn't break. The signing worked as intended.
CryptoDevil retweeted
@GoibiboSupport contacted me after my tweet, gave a quote which was 2X the original without any proper explaination (the airfare was the same as original), and asked me for my SCANNED PASSPORT stating it was an internal requirement - not wanting anymore delay I agreed to it.
2/5
CryptoDevil retweeted
@GoibiboSupport @goibibo I posted a thread detailing how @goibibo has been delaying a simple booking for over a month, and has ghosted me even after agreeing to quotes and taking my information. They contacted me after it, only to do it again!
1/5
No matter how dark it gets, light will find its way.
#YearOfTheDevil is around the corner.
Calling everyone that’s still here.
Any collector of the Genesis collection able to read this? opensea.io/collection/crypto…
