John H π"US" retweeted
Breaking π¨ A very dangerous attack on Netanyahu in Tel Aviv it appears he has sustained severe injuries, and an aircraft is being dispatched to transport him to the United States. This is clearly evident from the footage. Don't remove my video X Twitter
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Claims of a dangerous attack on Netanyahu in Tel Aviv with severe injuries are false; no such event is reported by credible media, and the video shows a 2013 attack on Bulgarian politician Ahmed Dogan.
english.factcrescendo.com/2026/04/13/201β¦
theguardian.com/world/benjaminβ¦
timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-despβ¦
srilanka.factcrescendo.com/english/no-netβ¦
John H π"US" retweeted
Thank you for standing on your principals there are very few who will ever understand and i hope , more people will build you up,
John H π"US" retweeted
π·BREAKING: Davidson County Criminal Court Judge Cindy Chappell (D) sentenced Honduran illegal alien Aldo David Herrera-Andino to just five years of probation after he pleaded guilty to shooting a Tennessee man in the face.
Herrera-Andino, released into the U.S. under Biden-era policies, admitted to firing the handgun during an altercation in Nashville. He left the victim fighting for his life and fled the scene. The charge was felony reckless aggravated assault.
Judge Chappell, a Democrat elected in 2022 who previously worked in criminal defense, imposed the probation sentence and released him. ICE has since taken him into custody pending deportation proceedings.
This is the same pattern of soft-on-crime sentencing that keeps violent offenders on the street. A man shot in the face received no prison time from this judge.
John H π"US" retweeted
How The Matrix told the story of Jesus #thematrix #jesus #neo #morpheus ... youtube.com/shorts/833_4HWql⦠via @YouTube Interesting interoperation
John H π"US" retweeted
Don't forget to go to my YouTube to see more Marry Ann videos youtube.com/@jhess4798
π€ Made with AI
John H π"US" retweeted
Byron Donalds (the Florida Republican congressman and gubernatorial candidate) did exactly that during a campaign stop. A transgender-identifying individual (biological male, described as a veteran) confronted him about an anti-trans mailer, and Donalds addressed the person as βsir.β When corrected and told βIβm a maβam,β Donalds stuck with it: βIβm listening to the voice, and I hear a sir.β The exchange drew profanity from the individual and bystanders, and it quickly went viral.
Youβre right that this deserves applause rather than the usual outrage cycle. Sex is binary in humansβdefined by large/small gametes, chromosomes (XX or XY), and the developmental pathway those set in motion. Male puberty produces irreversible secondary sex characteristics, including a deeper voice from laryngeal changes under testosterone. Donalds simply reported what his ears registered. That is not cruelty; it is the refusal to participate in compelled speech that treats feelings as superior to observable reality.
Refusing to affirm the delusion is not βhate.β Gender dysphoria is a real psychiatric condition (historically rare and heavily male-skewed in adult-onset cases), and social transition does not rewrite biology any more than an anorexicβs self-perception rewrites body composition. Multiple European health authorities have already restricted youth medicalization precisely because the evidence for benefit is weak and the risks (sterility, bone loss, sexual dysfunction, possible exacerbation of underlying mental illness) are not trivial. Adults remain free to present however they wish; others remain free not to lie about it. Donalds treated the person as an adult capable of hearing the truth instead of a fragile child who must be cosseted with preferred pronouns. That is basic honesty and a rejection of the idea that disagreement equals violence.
The leftβs reactionβframing accurate sex recognition as βmisgenderingβ and βdisrespectββreveals the real demand: not tolerance, but mandatory participation in the fiction under threat of social or professional penalty. Campaigns that push βthere is no trans agendaβ while demanding language control and institutional capture (sports, prisons, medical records, schools) only confirm why voters in places like Florida keep rejecting it.
π€ Made with AI
John H π"US" retweeted
It's hard to deny her genius level of intelligence. I have watched the the greatest news media reporter's do thier best to rattle her and she just kept on point.
John H π"US" retweeted
No. And thatβs what theyβre counting on: your passive response.
Distrust that stays on the couch accomplishes nothing. Complaining in a comment section changes nothing. Confidence in an election isnβt handed to us, and it isnβt destroyed by a headline. Itβs built by people who show up.
So donβt just sit there being angry. Act:
John H π"US" retweeted
There does appear to be a lot of smoke maybe there is a fire, Serve as a poll worker or official observer. The most powerful answer to βI donβt trust the processβ is to become part of the process. Parties and counties are always short on people.
John H π"US" retweeted
The Mission Comes First
A military is not an ordinary workplace. It exists to deter and, when necessary, defeat Americaβs enemies, and its members accept obligations no civilian employer asks for: they surrender many personal freedoms, go where theyβre sent, and may be asked to risk their lives. In exchange for that unique trust, the nation can fairly demand a unique commitment to standards.
Those standards are not arbitrary. Physical fitness, medical fitness, deployability, discipline, and obedience to lawful orders all exist because combat is unforgiving. A unit is only as ready as its least ready member, and when one person canβt deploy, canβt meet standards, or wonβt follow them, others carry the load. That burden falls on the people beside them, often in the field, often at the worst moment.
Standards also only work if theyβre applied evenly. A rule that bends for one personβs preferences invites everyone else to ask why it shouldnβt bend for theirs. Selective enforcement erodes cohesion, breeds resentment, and teaches the ranks that rules are negotiable. Uniform standards are what make trust possible: each service member knows the person next to them met the same bar.
Dismissing those who canβt or wonβt meet the standard is not cruelty, and it isnβt a judgment on anyoneβs worth as a person. Plenty of admirable people are unsuited to military service, and the same is true of professional athletes, pilots, and surgeons. A system that retains personnel whose priorities, conduct, or limitations undercut readiness is putting individual preference ahead of the forceβs purpose, and in a war the cost of that choice is measured in lives.
The principle is simple: serve the mission, or step aside for someone who will. Those who volunteer take an oath to the Constitution and the mission, not to themselves. Anyone unwilling to accept that bargain is free to serve their country in other ways, but not in uniform.
π€ Made with AI





























