Danny Ebanks (@DannyCEbanks) header
Danny Ebanks (@DannyCEbanks) profile picture

Methods, American Politics | Researcher for the Institute of Quantitative Social Science at Harvard

Cambridge, MA
Joined May 2013
2/2 If you want to understand the dynamic of the midterm election across the nation, read this recent working paper by @DannyCEbanks, @kinggary, and @Jonathan_N_Katz: gking.harvard.edu/10k/ Also use their amazing election prediction application: gking.harvard.edu/electit/
1
1
3
182
1/2 As we enter the final weekend of the 2026 midterm elections in the US, two things for your reading list. To understanding what is going on in the minds of those who have still haven't voted, take a look at this recent paper with @DannyCEbanks: frontiersin.org/journals/pol…
1
1
6
386
A few notes, we give you the chance to build your own forecast going back to 1946. If you think there is another polling error like in 2016, or want to see what the model would say in 1956, try all these possibilities, make your own modeling decisions, and see the numbers change!
New 2026 US House & Senate election forecasts, using all political science knowledge we could systematize, & our statistical methods from “If a Statistical Model Predicts That Common Events Should Occur Only Once in 10,000 Elections, Maybe It’s the Wrong Model” with @DannyCEbanks and @Jonathan_N_Katz. GaryKing.org/electit We make these forecasts available (including all the input data, methods, and procedures), not only for their possible public interest, but because academics learn by making themselves vulnerable to being proven wrong. We will make no changes to our post-primary forecasts (which do not use polls) but will update two other sets on this site incorporating poll results as new ones appear. Comments on the paper or forecasts are welcome!
1
5
2
27
2,058
We also estimates of candidate effects and the polls to see how candidates help or hurt their party's chances in a particular seat!
1
2
61
All data and our paper/math/methods are freely available on the landing page and the data tab, respectively.
1
49
Danny Ebanks retweeted
New 2026 US House & Senate election forecasts, using all political science knowledge we could systematize, & our statistical methods from “If a Statistical Model Predicts That Common Events Should Occur Only Once in 10,000 Elections, Maybe It’s the Wrong Model” with @DannyCEbanks and @Jonathan_N_Katz. GaryKing.org/electit We make these forecasts available (including all the input data, methods, and procedures), not only for their possible public interest, but because academics learn by making themselves vulnerable to being proven wrong. We will make no changes to our post-primary forecasts (which do not use polls) but will update two other sets on this site incorporating poll results as new ones appear. Comments on the paper or forecasts are welcome!
5
83
6
230
41,589
Glad to see this out in FirstView!
Currently in FirstView: In “Analyzing Political Text at Scale with Online Tensor LDA,”@SaraKangaslahti, @DannyCEbanks, @JeanKossaifi, @anqi_liu33, @rmichaelalvarez, and @AnimaAnandkumar introduce a topic modeling method that scales linearly to billions of documents.
1
8
283
Forthcoming paper in Political Analysis The method features mathematically provable guarantees of accuracy and the ability to train the model end-to-end on a local GPU. Our next project is to take these outputs to improve LLM training and classification performance. More soon!
2
5
8
389
The model’s theoretical guarantees dovetail with its practical performance so that method can reliably process text on the scale of billions of documents in feasible time, allowing Social Science researchers to vastly scale up their study of text.
1
2
45
This frees up resources to check for model hyper parameter robustness, to validate the model, and to alleviate practical constraints for researchers who mainly have access to local computing resources.
2
41
Excited to share new published work driven by brilliant (now graduate) researchers Sreemanti Dey and Sarah Hashash and @rmichaelalvarez . We compiled a dataset of social media conversations about election administration to study interactions between election staff and the public.
1
2
1
10
891
Our contributions: (a) a flexible, seed-based data-collection architecture for social media; (b) combined JST and temporal modeling to track animosity in near real-time; (c) empirical evidence linking the loser’s effect to spikes in hostile interactions.
1
2
150