Your jokes always make me laugh. I'm glad that I followed you a few years ago as what you post brings some rare laughter to me each day.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
103
Samuel Davis retweeted
I wanted to make you all aware of something extremely concerning that has happened over the past couple of weeks.
As many of you know, I’ve resumed the safeguarding email to GP surgeries, ICBs, PCNs and primary care teams across the UK, the same email that has already led to so many positive conversations, changes, and support for Lyla’s Law.
But every single time I’ve tried to send it recently, I’ve received bounce back messages from the Postmaster saying: “Your message wasn’t delivered because the recipient’s email provider rejected it.”
This isn’t happening once or twice. It’s happening every time. Also, it’s not just GP surgeries anymore. I’m now being blocked from emailing several diabetes professionals I’ve built strong working relationships with. These are people who have always been able to receive my emails without issue.
Given the nature of what I’m sending, safeguarding information, the 4T’s posters, and the details of Lyla’s preventable death, this is deeply troubling.
Therefore, I have written to the NHS with the following:
"Dear all,
I am writing to raise a serious concern regarding what appears to be the blocking or filtering of my email addresses, ………………. and ………………. by NHS England’s IT systems.
Over recent weeks, I have returned to sending important safeguarding communication to GP practices, ICBs, PCNs and primary care teams across the UK. However, I have repeatedly received bounce back emails from the Postmaster stating: “Your message wasn’t delivered because the recipient’s email provider rejected it.” This has happened every time I have attempted to send the message, clearly suggesting that my emails are being blocked before they can reach recipients.
In addition to this, I am now also being blocked from emailing several professionals within the diabetes field with whom I have built strong working relationships. These are individuals who have previously communicated with me without issue, and who play an important role in the ongoing work surrounding Type 1 Diabetes awareness and safety. This development is extremely concerning and further indicates that my email addresses may have been flagged or restricted at a wider system level.
Given the nature of the communication, this situation is deeply troubling.
The email along with the 4T’s poster attachments I have been attempting to send relates to the preventable death of my two year old daughter, Lyla, and the national campaign that has followed. It contains essential information about early detection of Type 1 Diabetes, adherence to NICE Guideline NG18, and the safeguarding of children who cannot articulate their symptoms. It is not marketing, spam, or a circular email. It is a public health matter with life saving implications, regardless of block sending them within the BCC field or otherwise.
Blocking these communications is not only detrimental to the work I am doing with NHS England and GP Surgeries, but also insensitive in light of the subject matter and the positive engagement I have received from many surgeries who have successfully received the message. Every undelivered email represents a missed opportunity to improve awareness and prevent further tragedies.
I therefore request that NHS England urgently:
1. Investigates why my email addresses have been blocked, filtered, or flagged by your IT systems.
2. Reviews any national or regional filtering rules that may be preventing my communications from reaching GP practices and diabetes professionals.
3. Immediately unblocks my email addresses to ensure that this safeguarding information can reach the intended recipients without obstruction.
4. Confirms what steps will be taken to prevent this from happening again.
Thank you for your urgent attention to this matter. I would appreciate confirmation that an investigation has begun and that my email addresses have been unblocked as a priority.
Sincerely,
Mr. John Paul Story
QiC Diabetes – The People’s Award Winner 2025
FdSc Rehabilitation Work (Visual Impairment)"
This sort of attitude is exactly why T1 diabetes is so misunderstood. Many with long term T1 lose their hypo warning signs until their glucose is substantially lower. @T1_Lesley might just be shakey, but at a similar level as a non T1 you'd be in severe distress or unconscious.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
2
148
Samuel Davis retweeted
Do you have ADHD or Autism and Diabetes?
Please support an Msc student with her research into experiences of healthcare for people who have Autism or ADHD with diabetes
🔗to participate see information sheet here qualtrics.kcl.ac.uk/jfe/form…
Samuel Davis retweeted
For the umpteenth time, not all adult-onset #diabetes is #type2diabetes. In fact, #type1diabetes arises more often in adulthood than childhood. This large database study showed that about 1 in 26 cases were later re-classified, but how many more weren't? medscape.com/viewarticle/rec…
Samuel Davis retweeted
Data from our UK wide workforce report shows significant variation in immunology nurse provision across the country.
Scotland faces the greatest shortage, with only one immunology nurse for more than one million people.
Samuel Davis retweeted
The momentum grows- thanks to the work of @triggersbroom17
#T1Diabetes
Health Secretary @wesstreeting to meet dad over diabetes plea bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c98p…
@NHSEngland @DHSCgovuk @BT1DUK @DiabetesUK
Samuel Davis retweeted
We paired up with @Metro to investigate experiences of hospital care while living with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
80% of participants surveyed said they felt hospital care was insufficient, with people reporting incidents where they were not allowed to manage their own insulin or received incorrect guidance or dosage.
"We urgently need to strengthen the quality of hospital care with improved training and a thorough understanding of T1D, so that people living with it receive the care they deserve." Hilary Nathan, Breakthrough T1D
Read the full article: bit.ly/3NRXNbp and our ageing report: bit.ly/3SO43jN to find out more
#Type1Diabetes #GBDoc #Research
Samuel Davis retweeted
If you shock cells with electricity, it will punch holes in the cell membrane and allow DNA to go inside. It's a ubiquitous means to transform or engineer living cells.
And yet, so-called "electroporation" seems like an odd discovery. How exactly did we figure this out?
Well, I dug into various papers from the 1970s and 80s, and this is what I found.
The original idea to "zap" cells with electricity actually had an INVERSE purpose; instead of using electricity to get stuff INTO cells, scientists used it to get stuff OUT of them.
In the 1950s, physiologists like Alan Hodgkin and Andrew Huxley studied squid axons and discovered how nerve impulses cause cells to release neurotransmitters. In 1972, two scientists at the Weizmann Institute (Eberhard Neumann and Kurt Rosenheck) wondered if this same principle would work in isolation; what if we could use controlled pulses of electricity to coax cells to release, well, other things?
The duo took some vessicles filled with ATP and proteins, put them between platinum electrodes, and shocked them. Then, they used a UV spectrometer to see which molecules were released. Surprisingly, they found that small molecules were released while the bigger proteins remained trapped inside.
The duo also discovered that membranes become PERMEABLE, but not destroyed, when zapped with electricity. The electricity punches holes in the membrane only for a very short time.
A decade later, in 1982, recombinant DNA has become a widespread technology. Molecular biologists are cloning genes, but find it tedious to get their DNA into cells. The main methods available are calcium-phosphate solutions (which carry DNA through the membrane via electrostatic charges), microinjections, and viruses. But none of these methods work reliably across cell lines.
So Eberhard Neumann (the same guy from 1972) thinks: "Huh, if electricity can punch holes into membranes and cause them to leak stuff out, perhaps I could use it to put stuff in..." And that's what he did.
Neumann took some mouse fibroblast cells deficient in an enzyme called thymidine kinase. The cells need this particular enzyme to grow in a special growth medium, called HAT.
Next, Neumann took some plasmids encoding the thymidine kinase gene and tried to shock it into cells. If the cells took up the plasmid, then they would survive in the HAT broth. If they didn't, then they would die and fail to grow.
He tried many electrical settings, with different field strengths, pulse durations, temperatures, and DNA concentrations. After each attempt, he tried to grow the cells. Using this basic experimental framework, he figured out the optimal settings to transform cells and invented the technology now known as "electroporation." His paper has been cited thousands of times.
TL;DR: The idea to shock cells for DNA transformation came from observations, in the 1950s, that electrical signals in nerves coax cells to release neurotransmitters. Very cool!
Samuel Davis retweeted
Attention all County and District Councils, hotels, clubs and community centres who are organising a firework/bonfire night:
*****Please don't make this event be something you'll regret for the rest of your life*****
Unlike most mammals, hedgehogs don't have the Fight or Flight Response to danger.
That means that no matter how frightened they are, they don't bite, and they don't run away.
Their response to danger is to curl up into a protective ball, and wait until the danger passes.
That's why so many get run over by approaching cars. That's why so many are maimed and killed by approaching strimmers.
And that's why so many get burned alive in bonfires.
Poking a stick under the bonfire pile will just make the hedgehog inside curl into a ball.
Even if you touch her and hurt her, she won't move or make a sound.
Lighting it from one side will just make the hedgehog curl even tighter.
As the smoke fills her lungs and her coat begins to singe, she will freeze in place and wait for the danger to pass.
Shining a light under the bonfire will just make the hedgehog ball even tighter.
She'll close her eyes so they don't reflect light and give her presence away.
The ONLY way to make a bonfire safe is to build it the same day you light it.
So if it's already built, you need to move it on the day you light it.
If you are starting to build it in place then you MUST first enclose the area with a hedgehog-proof fence, to ensure no hogs enter.
If you can take the trouble to have a bonfire, then please take the trouble to do it safely.
Please don't make this event be something you'll regret for the rest of your life.
Printable PDF of this poster available here: tinyurl.com/HedgehogCabin
Samuel Davis retweeted
Please do NOT be taken in by this account claiming to raise money for charities.
Mr Lumpy is NOT a ‘sanctuary’; it is a couple who feed wild animals in their garden, something plenty of us do without expecting to be paid for it!
Do your research!
unavailable
Is it just me, or can about 9 out of 10 questions asked on ResearchGate be answered by asking if appropriate positive and negative controls were included? It seems these days like students don't get taught about the proper design of experiments at all!
54
1/2 What a sad state of affairs to see the @NIH be gutted and shamelessly used as a political tool like this to promote a decidedly anti-science bias. Science works on finding the facts and using these to objectively and rationally determine the outcome from the data.
1
63
Samuel Davis retweeted
As we are in September now, and the start of the 'autumn orphan' baby hedgehog season, I thought I'd repost this example from last year, as a warning:
"This is such a sad story, every time I think of what this poor girl has suffered, I cry.
Found as a baby on the road, out in the day time, in October last year, this little hog was taken in by a lovely couple in their 70s.
They rang the British Hedgehog Preservation Society (@hedgehogsociety) and asked what they should do. They were given the details of 2 local rescues.
These were full, so they rang the society back and asked what they should do.
"Just keep her," they were told.
"Feed her and fatten her up and release her in the spring".
NEVER EVER DO THIS.
Trusting the society knew what they were doing, and their advice could be trusted, the couple obeyed.
They kept the baby hedgehog in a 3 foot by 3 foot box, with a pile of bedding in one half, food in one corner (raw chicken and some cat biscuits, as advised by the vet they rang, again as advised by the BHPS), and the other corner for a toilet.
NEVER ASK A VET FOR WILDLIFE ADVICE.
This poor little hedgehog was kept in this box and grew up in it, from October to now, April.
6 months.
Living in a box.
The couple were so worried they were not doing the right thing, but were told all was fine by the BHPS.
This week, after reading hedgehogs are up and about, they phoned the BHPS again for advice.
They were told to release the hedgehog.
Just like that.
This baby who had known nothing but a wooden box for all her life, who was completely institutionised and had never walked more than 2 foot distance, so had no muscle tone, just put out, defenceless and utterly unprepared.
The lovely couple didn't like to question the British Hedgehog Preservation Society, thinking that because of the name that they were some kind of authority on hedgehogs, but felt in their heart it was wrong, so they phoned a local rescue for advice.
The rescue was, understandably, shocked and horrified to hear what had been done to this poor wild animal. They shouted at the kind couple, and made the wife cry, and the husband very upset.
But still the couple persisted, and called another local rescue.
This old couple are quiet, and of a generation who feel subserviant to anyone they feel has more knowledge than them, so are slow to deny suppositions or explain themselves.
The second rescue didn't listen, and gave them no time to explain. She shouted at them, told them they were cruel, and that she would be taking the hedgehog from them, and they were to bring the hedgehog to her, and that she would text her address.
She never did.
Thankfully.
But still this lovely couple, so worried and wanting to do the right thing, persevered.
And called me.
I explained that the British Hedgehog Preservation Society (@hedgehogsociety) is just a group of people who raise funds for research. They have no personal experience or knowledge of hedgehogs, and are NOT qualified to give advice.
They keep a list of some UK rescues (some rescues, like me, choose not to be on it).
The volunteers who answer the phone are not experienced or knowledgeable and should NOT give advice. All they should do is give the caller the details of rescues, who will then triage the call and advise the finder.
They should NEVER have told anyone to keep a hedgehog casualty.
If this little one had had lungworm or fluke she would have died a horrible, agonising death.
And 98% of autumn orphans have lungworm and/or fluke.
If you find a hedgehog casualty or are worried about any aspect of their health, always speak directly to a rescue. They are the frontline and will happily advise you. Just Google 'hedgehog rescue' and a list will appear in order of distance from you.
Vets in the UK are not wildlife trained.
They are a business for domestic animals only, who have completely different needs to wild animals.
So vets know no more about wildlife care than you.
A good vet will tell you this, and refer you to a wildlife rescue.
Unfortunately some vets find that difficult to do, and give baseless, incorrect and often lethal 'advice'.
The only place to get advice about wild animals is from a wildlife rescue or hospital.
Feeding raw chicken could have killed this baby in many ways. It's so low in calcium and so high in phosphorus that had the couple not supplemented it with cat biscuits, this little baby would have been crippled and died in agony of Metabolic Bone Disease.
Raw chicken can also contain deadly bacteria, like salmonella.
The ONLY safe food for hedgehogs is complete cat/kitten/puppy food - one that has meat listed as the 1st ingredient.
This poor girl is here now, so is safe.
She has two different types of internal parasites; roundworm, and capillaria aerophila; a type of lungworm.
If she had these when first taken in she would have died horribly by now.
So, as she hasn't set foot outside, the parasites probably came from the food she was given (some people dig up worms from their garden, or slugs, to feed captive hedgehogs, not knowing these are intermediate hosts for all sorts of parasites).
Because the arrival of food was the only shaft of light in her otherwise bleak existence, and it was impossible for her to exercise, she is overweight.
Her skin is red and sore and overstretched.
She is in a high state of stress; both chronic, long-term from her imprisonment, and from the huge change she has experienced coming here.
I've put her in a special large pen, so while she is here being treated for her physical ailments she can get some muscle tone built up.
I've called her Liberty, because that is something I am determined she will have, when mended."
I'm happy to say although it took quite a few weeks, poor Liberty was successfully rehabilitated and released into a wonderful supportive garden, where she could have a gentle introduction to the big wild world.
Since then her confidence has grown to the extent that she has left the garden to live truly wild, but still returns for food, to the safe trusted oasis.
If you find a hedgehog of any size out in the day, please immediately ring a trusted, experienced *rescue* for advice. We are always happy to help.
#GBDoc Information on who is/isn't eligible for a COVID-19 vaccine in the UK this Autumn and in future (link in tweet). Those with diabetes are no longer eligible unless above 75 and/or another condition causes them to be immunocompromised (see list in link).
Replying to @T1_Lesley
It's influenza only. Those under 75 (unless immunosuppressed) and in a clinical risk group (e.g diabetes) are no longer included in any COVID-19 vaccine schemes from now on, unless something like a substantially different non-JN. 1 lineage variant emerges. ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2025/06/26…
Samuel Davis retweeted
Snaq. A diabetes AI to help you carb count. Badly. dlvr.it/TMNCxK
Samuel Davis retweeted
Yup, this is a real thing people (men and women) with type 1 and type 2 diabetes deal with!
Maybe he assumes we’re sick and weak.
Oh, but it shines a bright light on ignorance and small-minded thinking. 🔦
But it’s real:
“I avoided dating for so long because I didn’t want to feel like a burden.” @heyitsjuliaflaherty
“Guys who judge a girl for that…I feel like they think our lifestyle must be so unhealthy. ‘I don’t want to date a girl who lives like that’. Little do they know, we’re more in touch with our health than most people!” @t1disco
Move along, people with diabetes are too good for you anyway. 😉❤️
#datingproblems #type1diabetes #datingtipsforwomen #datingadviceformen #datingtips
Samuel Davis retweeted
Monday…perfect day to remember the basics
#T1Diabetes #gbdoc 💙


























