DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab) profile picture

the lab of Michael DeWeese at UC Berkeley | neuroscience, neural nets, and nonequilibrium stat mech | https://nitter.cf/t.co/YfRrMlakoN | run by students

Joined November 2020
Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)Photo by DeWeese Lab (@DeWeeseLab)
Very excited to share our new paper out in PRL today (as an Editors’ Suggestion)! We unify thermodynamic geometry 🔥 and optimal transport 🥖 providing a coherent picture for optimal minimal-work protocols for arbitrary driving strengths 💪 and speeds ⏱️ ! journals.aps.org/prl/abstrac…
1
21
4
91
11,297
A nice figure from the manuscript (-:
1
305
Found a kindred spirit at #icml2023 #feelthelearn
21
340
56
2,765
295,501
Interested in representation learning or self-supervised learning (SSL)? Check out this work led by lab member Jamie Simon, which gives the first compelling scientific picture of the training process of modern SSL methods like SimCLR! Appearing at ICML '23.
Self-supervised learning lets neural nets learn from unlabeled data. Yet despite its success w/ models like @Midjourney, how image representations are learned has been poorly understood. In a @ICMLConf paper, we share the first scientific picture of the SSL training process 👇
1
4
19
3,743
The upshot: representations are build one dimension at a time in a process of gradual rank increase. This process -- which can be strikingly observed even with e.g. SimCLR trained off-the-shelf! -- is quite general, and an almost-inevitable consequence of model symmetry.
309
Happy to see Jamie's research about the stepwise nature of SSL on the BAIR blog: bairblog.github.io/2023/07/1… If you're interested in learning more, stop by and say hi to us at ICML next week!
3
9
2,551
Lab member @dhruvakarkada just revamped the NTK wikipedia entry to make it more accessible to technical non-experts. cool gif inside -- check it out! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural…
1
15
2,204
Check out @genintelligent, a new startup aiming to develop fundamental understanding of AI, and their Avalon environment for the development and testing of generally capable RL agents!
Today, AI systems can create stunning art & beat humans at chess & Go. But they can't do things a 3-year-old can do. Why? We're launching @genintelligent & open sourcing our research environment, Avalon, so as a community we can answer these questions: generallyintelligent.com/lau…
1
2
We're happy to announce that lab member Jamie Simon is a P̶e̶r̶m̶a̶n̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶I̶n̶t̶e̶r̶n̶ Research Fellow with the startup and a coauthor on the Avalon paper!
2
DeWeese Lab retweeted
In 2020, @michael_nielsen & I began a 2-month project to write: "how would we fund science?" 2 years & 40,000 words later, it's become: "how can the culture & institutions of science actually change, and ultimately become self-improving?" Our answer: scienceplusplus.org/metascie…
28
171
47
851
Seen the recent papers demonstrating that neural nets' learned functions are very close to kernel regression (KR) with the net's *post-training empirical NTK*? What properties should we expect in such data-adapted kernels? Our new arXiv note suggests some: arxiv.org/abs/2209.01691
2
8
47
galvanizing thinking about *adaptive* kernel methods. If we understood how a neural net's NTK really adapted to data, this would go a *long* way towards clarifying nets. This note is a first little step towards clarifying how we might think about such objects.
1
2
Thanks to several folks for input, including @PreetumNakkiran and @dbeagleholeCS.
2
How can we design neural networks in a principled way? New work from @DeWeeseLab @berkeley_ai explores a theoretically-motivated paradigm for doing just that for dense networks! Read about it here: bair.berkeley.edu/blog/2022/…
1
24
4
120
In common learning rate schedules for deep learning, lr almost always *decays* (i.e. decreases with time). Loss plateaus if you don't do this. Is it known why? Help us understand what's known!
4
1
8
For example, on a quadratic loss surface (or with a net in the lazy regime), the optimal lr is constant in time. For a quartic loss surface, the optimal lr can *increase* with time. Why do practical deep nets need a decaying lr?
1