Ephesians 6:14 Matthew 7:14 $ORE
The Casino
Joined December 2024
- Tweets2.5K
- Following338
- Followers946
- Likes11.5K
Dr Salt (sha/ ker) โ๏ธ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
WL checker is live
elysiummachines.xyz
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โผ LAUNCH
Fri, Nov 6 ยท 15:00 UTC
ยท Fair launch through $MACHINE (ERC-404)
ยท No team allocation
ยท The full supply sits in one pool on a curve
ยท 3% fee on every trade, for everyone. The fees go to the reward pool for lit machines
โผ THE FIRST 6 HOURS
ยท WL wallets โ standard 3%
ยท Everyone else โ 40%
ยท That 40% also goes straight to the reward pool
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ. The reward pool is distributed to activated machines right away. The earlier you light yours, the more it collects.
โผ BRIDGE
A bridge goes live at launch, so you can move your assets to Elysium in a couple of clicks, right on the site.
Docs: elysiummachines.xyz/docs
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
Last call before boot.
Drop your EVM wallet below. We'll add the most active ones to the whitelist.
Dr Salt (sha/ ker) โ๏ธ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
This is a very textbook phenomenon in the market called โrotation out of all the names you specifically own and into names you donโtโ. This happens when all the market participants have a meeting you arenโt invited to and decide they hate you.
Dr Salt (sha/ ker) โ๏ธ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE!
You can now purchase $MOTION directly via Jupiter.
pRoFiTj36haRD5sG2Neqib9KoSrtdYMGrM7SEkZetfR
ethereum:0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766 looks real good today after the 1.6% of supply unlock.
Another 0.4% in 3 days!
Then another 2% every month from now ๐คฃ
Anyone shilling you this or the memecoins on @LaunchOnSF wants you to lose money.
Bro tweeted at the lows after accumulating supply to dump on degens
I am not going away @vladtenev @DanGallagher
AMC Entertainment does not consent to Robinhood creating Stock Tokens to replicate AMC shares in the United States (the SEC requires you to get our consent, or failing that, at least with us to stand down). They are fake, synthetic shares, which could impact our capital structure.
AMC should control our financial destiny, not Robinhood.
While everyoneโs crying about quantum security Iโm out here chilling.
Let me know when the bottoms in so I can buy your bags.
Little late to the party. Better late than never though.
Can anyone give me tldr on solana:BPxxfRCXkUVhig4HS1Lh7kZqV6SPJhzfEk4x6fVBjPCy?
Dr Salt (sha/ ker) โ๏ธ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
The LONG founder calling out & highlighting @schiffygld by name as an example of an OG cracked team & community
The good boy is on the right people's radar and no amount of day to day rotating is going to disturb the direction hes going ๐พ
$SCHIFFY is built for the LONG run
A perspective:
- LONG pioneered stock pairs, and we did it on Robinhood Chain. The first ones to take RWAs seriously and the biggest retail finance brand in the world.
-We built network effects from 0. No official amplification, no partnerships, no major exchange listings(testament for PMF + extremely fair and organic approach)
- We are leading on stock pairs. $1.5b+ in RWA volume, millions in TVL. We are writing the playbook.
- LONG stock pairs are the most liquid pairs + leading on mcaps across the space(and actually have correlation with the stock instead of thin LP)
- LONG stock pairs are the most held assets (for example check fomo)
- LONG is the first platform that optimizes for PVE and price sustainability, with holders who can actually hold and a team that can iterate on making it better.
- Produced the highest number of runners in recent times? (and they are still running)
- The highest ratio in history of total volume to number of launches.
- AI has had more 70% dips than I can count. It survived everything and grew out of it(literally broke ATH just a few days ago)
- We had MEME becoming the center of the tokenization debate.
- We had BONER be the first one to engage with a public company CEO.
- We have cracked builders and OG communities that slow cook assets like MOO SCHIFFY SPACEHOOD (and many more!)
- We have an app that real humans actually use, with 100k weekly active users.
Mark my words, rotation between metas, chains, and assets will not impact LONG users once we hit a few milestones(that's our goal since day 1 not being just another launcher who compete on the same pie)
We will build our own distribution. We will not stay still and wait for the "real" bull market or the next leg up. We will bring it ourselves with SHEER willpower and it's gonna be beautiful for our early adopters.
Trust the process and never stop believing.
LONG.
My broke normie friend, asked me about getting into crypto this week to help pay for a trip.
His financial knowledge stretches as far as UFC parleys.
I told him to bring some lube.
Then showed him my AI automated workflows.
He decided itโs not for him.
Dr Salt (sha/ ker) โ๏ธ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ retweeted
been thinking more on coherent messaging re: NEAR
let's ideate from first principles:
- the product of capitalism is markets
- capitalism -> markets -> competition -> specialization -> fragmentation
- within the specializations, there will be dominant leaders in each category
- SoV: gold, zec, btc
- trading: solana, hyperliquid, robinhood, binance
- currencies: usd, eur, gbp
- and on it goes: ai inference, private compute, real estate, international stocks, metals, e-commerce yada yada
- this requires connective tissue, which has been traditionally served via something like binance
- but one centralized company can not serve this need for infinite markets. there are too many handicaps, lack of network effects, and singular points of risk and stoppage. this is a rare case of decentralization being necessary. neutrality is non-negotiable for unstoppable global trade.
- now, you may see where I'm going and say: well Ethereum and Cosmos already tried this. but that's wrong. what they tried to do was structurally flawed
- those models required the succeeding nodes (L2s and L3s) to be from within the ecosystem, but that is incoherent since i) you can't force success, ii) if one were to succeed, they would just want to own the platform
- the other model is of course the Solana/Hyperliquid model of having everything concentrated on the L1. this model works. however this requires a high-degree of specialization to be competitive. you won't out nasdaq solana.
- but, NEAR does not need to do this. where there is concentration, there is also the need for connection.
- especially with their chain signature architecture, instead of forcing new internal nodes, they can just discover the successful ones and connect them to each other without ideology (see: NEAR intents supporting ZEC but also ZEC on Solana!)
- importantly, this is PvE and not zero sum. the more markets succeed, the more interesting NEAR becomes, i.e if Solana is one continent, and AI another, and Zcash another, then NEAR is the silk road.
so I think the coherent message for NEAR is:
the market of markets โ the capital of capital
