Draza Smith

Anybody else think the prospect of Fauci’s diary being unearthed is too good to be true? Just like burn bags, and secret rooms conveniently being unearthed, we have access to the mind of Fauci? “Dear diary, I can’t wait to get back to committing mass genocide. The lie I said during “meet the press” on wearing a double mask was my best yet! They’ll never catch me since I’m in league with Beelzebub—I wonder if Barack noticed! Anyway, time to get some shuteye. Lots of evil to do tomorrow! A.F.” It’s almost as if there was a plan….

Get rid of the machines, save our country! 01000111 01100101 01110100 00100000 01110010 01101001 01100100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100001 01100011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01100101 01110011 00101100 00100000 01110011 01100001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100011 01101111 01110101 01101110 01110100 01110010 01111001 00100001

🌹A FRIENDLY REMINDER 🌹 To: Those who forgot, We The People are supposed to control the government, NOT the other way around. It's time to get off that couch and do you job. Start first by taking back elections. #NoMachines Hand marked Paper ballots, Hand Counted at the Precinct

Wait a minute: "Did the CIA find any evidence they were able to interfere in the VZ election? No, according to recently released documents." doesn't tell the whole story. The election cheaters are using a virtual machine to do the dirty work in Dominion and ES&S election systems, then it collapses leaving very little to no trace. And they do it different ways/methods, and they don't do it in every single election machine, because they don't have to, to steal a given election. @ColonelTowner we should get every single person at Fort Huachuca on a witness stand under oath with public online viewing. @EmeraldRobinson

@AsheinAmerica it is not like the voter roll information China got was the same public released crud counties and states provide during public records request. It contains much more information. MOST IMPORTANTLY it is the method in which China used to obtain the data.

EVIDENCE: Unhardened Election Servers - Unauthorized USB Use, Video Games Installed, No NIST Hardening (GA) electioncrimebureau.com/evsi…

The SAVE Act didn't go far enough. Here is what should happen: 1. Zero out the voter rolls annually — no carry-over entries. 2. Rebuild each year with in-person registration only, requiring proof of ID and address. If voters can show up to vote on election day, they can register before it. We renew driver's licenses. We file taxes. Confirming eligibility to vote once a year is not a burden — it is a baseline civic obligation. Annual rebuilds eliminate dead voters, illegal aliens, cloned entries, and every other fraud-conducive category permanently, not temporarily. As long as rolls carry over year to year, the legacy pool of fraudulent identities remains available. Reset the list. Every year. This also addresses a less-discussed fraud vector: mass registration drives targeting low-propensity voters — college students, transient populations — create large pools of dormant records. A dormant record is an invitation. If you registered and never voted, annual renewal ensures that invitation expires.

THE FORMULAS WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the ballot drop data: Raman% = 27.87 + (3.19 × drop number) Pratt% = 22.05 - (1.17 × drop number) Bass% = 40.20 - (1.86 × drop number) Other% = 9.88 - (0.16 × drop number) The Starting Points The constants - 27.87, 22.05, 40.20, 9.88 - represent each candidate’s baseline. Where they genuinely stood when post-election counting began. Real votes. Organic support. These are the numbers before anything unusual occurs. The Slopes - How the Formula Runs The slope is the increment applied to each candidate every single drop. It gets multiplied by drop number - 1, 2, 3, 4 - which means the effect escalates automatically with each drop. So for Raman it isn’t just plus 3.19% every drop. It’s: Drop 1: 27.87 + (3.19 × 1) = 31.06% Drop 2: 27.87 + (3.19 × 2) = 34.25% Drop 3: 27.87 + (3.19 × 3) = 37.44% Drop 4: 27.87 + (3.19 × 4) = 40.63% Drop 5 predicted: 27.87 + (3.19 × 5) = 43.82% Each drop pushes her further from her baseline. It is built in. Automatic by design. The slopes also sum to exactly zero. +3.19 - 1.17 - 1.86 - 0.16 = 0.00 Every percentage point Raman gains comes precisely from the other three candidates/groups combined. This is a closed system. Conservation of votes. The formula doesn’t create votes - it redistributes them. The R Values - The results were remarkable To validate these formulas I ran linear regression analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients, R values, came back as follows: Raman vs Pratt: R = 0.9966 Raman vs Bass: R = 0.9934 Raman vs Batch: R = 0.9984 Raman vs Other: R = 0.9794 R values measure how perfectly data fits a straight line. They run from 0 to 1. 0 means completely random. No pattern whatsoever. 1 means a perfect straight line. Every point exactly where predicted. For context: 0.70 is considered strong in social science research. 0.85 gets researchers excited. 0.90+ is extraordinarily rare in human behavioral data. Squaring them to get R² values: Raman vs Pratt: R² = 0.9932 Raman vs Bass: R² = 0.9869 Raman vs Other: R² = 0.9592 Raman vs Batch: R² = 0.9968 That last number, 0.9968, means that 99.68% of Raman’s vote share movement across these drops is explained by a single variable. Drop number. Nothing else. Just counting to five. You get R values like that in physics experiments. In controlled laboratory conditions. Measuring the expansion of metal under heat. Not in elections. Not in a major American city with millions of diverse voters casting ballots across weeks. The Slope Relationship The slope of 3.110 between Raman and Pratt is particularly significant. It means for every percentage point Pratt lost Raman gained 3.110 points. Every drop. Without variation. Without noise. Candidates in a democratic election don’t move in mathematical opposition to each other at a fixed ratio across 200,000 ballots. Four variables in an equation do. Why The Shutoff Had To Exist Because drop number keeps increasing, the formula keeps pushing percentages further from baseline. Left unchecked by drop 7 the math produces: Raman: 27.87 + (3.19 × 7) = 50.2% Pratt: 22.05 - (1.17 × 7) = 13.9% Bass: 40.20 - (1.86 × 7) = 27.2% So the formula was never intended to run to completion. It was designed to run until a specific objective was achieved, Raman leading Pratt by a sufficient margin to secure the runoff and then stop. The stopping condition appears to have been triggered at approximately 38,000 votes into drop 5. The precise moment Raman crossed 3,000 votes ahead of Pratt. After that point the remaining 9,800 votes in drop 5 distributed at approximately the baseline that existed after drop four. The formula completed its task. Then it stopped. And the numbers went back to looking normal.

Overseas absentee ballot operation in Michigan was secretly rerouting ballots to local Detroit homes and then cast by strangers who didn't even know who the actual voters on the ballots were and then were counted in the 2017, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2024 elections. Investigators checked the case of Mary Elaine Beckman, where her ballot was processed from a Detroit house full of non-English-speaking immigrants. When investigators visited, the residents had never heard of her and couldn't even communicate in English. Investigators obtained lists showing absentee ballots were mailed to Detroit addresses on the West Side on 7 Mile, instead of the overseas addresses on file. No absentee ballot applications were ever sent to the actual overseas addresses for some voters. Ballots were still returned and counted as valid votes. A ballot for a person supposedly in Germany was mailed to a Detroit house and voted anyway.

All these computerized vote tabulation systems and high-tech gadgetry, and yet a full 3 days after the election we still don't have the reported Precinct level vote tallies matching the reported Locality level tallies -- within the same data files. These aren't separate data reports. Each horizontal bin in the graph is a snapshot of the data streams contained in the (singular) publicly available data report from VA Department of Elections on their website. Also ... how can they reliably come up with the locality total if they haven't finished counting and examining the individual precincts? ... Wasn't the move to electronic voting systems supposed to make things more efficient and accurate?

I got your intent right here Kash!

If you've been reading my work at @gatewaypundit , NOTHING in this unsealed affidavit is a surprise. The Gateway Pundit NAILED IT while the Mockingbird Media kept crying, "no evidence of widespread fraud." Great work on this investigation by @KevinMoncla @mad_liberals @VoterGa @TxSaving @GAballots @HollyKesler and others!

🚨 BREAKING: MASSIVE amounts of Albertans just formed a huge line to sign a petition to SECEDE from Canada - and potentially become the 51st state after gaining independence Alberta is the most conservative Canadian Province, and an election could be held soon for secession 51ST STATE? I'd welcome it! 🇺🇸🇺🇸 H/t @BehizyTweets