EdgeDimi retweeted
Four OpenClaw developers made @linuxfoundation’s Top 100 contributors list:
#1 @steipete
#7 @vincent_koc
#33 @obviyus
#57 @dallinfinite
569,649 contributions in a year. 13.8% of the Top 100 total.
Thank you, open-source community.
insights.linuxfoundation.org…
EdgeDimi retweeted
I hooked up our team claw to X to trigger work faster. Unassigned sessions are for anyone to grab. Our agent looks who worked on the related code last and pings people on the server.
Whole thing was a prompt and team server extended itself since plugins are now hot reloadable.
Opened a session to review PR #166379 for contrast, sidebar title spacing, and regressions.
team.openclaw.ai/chat/robocl…
EdgeDimi retweeted
Today we’re announcing OpenClaw Enterprise
In collaboration with @RedHat , @nvidia and @OpenAI the OpenClaw Foundation is open sourcing a powerful enterprise control plane for persistent agents
OpenClaw Enterprise is built to run on your own infrastructure and will always be free for an organization to use
openclaw.ai/blog/openclaw-en…
There are only 3 buckets of value that matter for AI implementations.
Time/cost savings: Is AI going to replace the work humans do, cheaper or faster?
Revenue uplift: Is AI going to increase the amount of money I make, after accounting for token spend?
Risk reduction: Will I be more accurate as a result of AI doing, or checking, the work my team does?
It's incredibly important to walk teams through this value capture exercise, allowing both sides to mutually agree on priorities, KPIs, and definition of success.
The reason why AI keeps failing is because giving everyone in the org access to Claude Code and burning through $10M in tokens in 3 months feels productive until you realize there was no time/cost saving, no revenue uplift, and no risk reduction.
$FARTCOIN update. TPing 50% midway around here .4050s , leaving the rest for the move higher or will reconsider for a trailing SL higher than the initial if PA starts showing weakness again. So we shorted the range highs we longed the deviation of the range lows in few days. Be fluid like the water.
EdgeDimi retweeted
Replying to @EdgeBuddy_
@EdgeBuddy_ changed UI to reflect the backend quality it delivers
EdgeDimi retweeted
Replying to @EdgeBuddy_
@EdgeBuddy_ is the first and only trading analytics platform to fully integrate @Lighter_xyz , the zkSync perpetuals DEX. Built custom WebAssembly cryptography, derived P&L algorithms, and blockchain-native parsers to make
your on-chain trades analyzable.
EdgeDimi retweeted
when consumers don't care that you're building an AI product (and might even hate it)
I'm hearing a common thread from consumer AI founders: Consumers often don't really care that your new startup product uses AI under the covers, and in fact, when they find out, they find it to be a negative.
WTF? I thought everyone was supposed to love AI.
It's simple: we've trained consumers for decades to believe that the fanciest, best customer interaction is a one-on-one human concierge doing whatever you want. Automation is seen as cutting corners. The most luxurious hotel/travel experiences involve overstaffed resorts where humans cater to your every whim. The highest level of customer service from a product company? The founder working directly with you to solve your problem. So, when consumers hear you're using product underneath, they're often repelled, associating it with low-cost, cheap service.
It's tough when you're in the business of using AI to disrupt a human-intensive industry. Think AI travel planning, dating concierge, or real estate brokers. The vision is clear: use AI to create more interactivity, answer questions quickly, and give great service. But many founders are finding that customers most value interacting with another human. How do you get around this? How do you solve the problem of building powerful AI that consumers seem to dislike?
In the end, whether your product uses AI or not, consumers just care about the results. That might mean your product is there for them 24/7, able to answer questions instead of interacting with a call center rep where it takes minutes to connect. Or maybe the detail that you're creating in your product might take a human hours, but your service can create it instantly. So maybe it's the speed, comprehensiveness, and instantaneous nature of it. Or maybe it's that the cost is incredibly low because you don't have to pay humans to do all this work. Either way, these things become the value props, not "AI." If your product uses AI, it's more of an enabling technology, something that sits underneath that ties all the capabilities together. But just as we stopped caring about megahertz, bandwidth speeds, etc, we'll stop caring about what underlying model is used. It's the question of whether the UX is better or not.
This conclusion feels obvious in some ways, but it also flies in the face of the current startup/investor mindset. Why is that?
The reason is that in the B2B market, startups are finding enterprise customers very excited and motivated to evaluate and buy AI products. That's because it's such a tech big technology trend that there is a top down drive towards utilizing AI to potentially decrease costs. As a result, everything in B2B is pulling new AI startups into their markets, and creating a ton of value along the way. However, consumers just interact with products differently. Caring less about the underlying functionality and technology trends and much more about things like brand, visual appeal, UX, and the evaluation process sometimes happens intuitively and quickly.
It's worth acknowledging that investors are pushing every new startup to bet big on AI. There are a lot of reasons for this, and some of it is circular. The good reason is that AI is a new general-purpose technology that might reinvent every product category and answer the "why now" question, so even apps that have been tried over the last 20 years can be retried with a different approach. Plus, if you don't at least pretend to have an AI strategy, some VCs simply aren't interested in even looking at the company. As a result, you have a whole generation of startups that want to yell loudly in their pitch decks about how AI-native they are, even while their consumer customers seem confused or dislike AI.
The consumer value prop for your startup can be totally different than how you talk about it with investors, employees, and partners. For consumers, the shortest path to conveying immediate value is the way to go. Describe your product with a pithy tagline so they know how they'll get value within 30 seconds.
However, investors and employees want to know how what you're doing will eventually revolutionize the world. Google might be a search engine, but its mission is to organize the world's information. An AI travel planning app might be positioned as "The quickest way to build a vacation itinerary for your family," but for investors, it's described as an "AI-native travel marketplace."
EdgeDimi retweeted
Most good things in life are free. Having the time to enjoy them is the expensive part
EdgeDimi retweeted
Replying to @adam__xyz
What we have here is a secular priesthood preaching gospel to a generation of men hungry for guidance, yet incapable of fulfilling the most basic biological or civilizational imperative: the creation of a family.
Tim Ferriss: the productivity hacker turned self-experimenting monk. Andrew Huberman: the neuroscience demigod whose dopamine maps rarely intersect with intimacy or fatherhood. Lex Fridman: the emotionless black-clad pod-priest who flirts with sentimentality but recoils at generativity. These aren’t men with families — they’re cult leaders of sterile optimization. Their mantra: hack your life — not live your life.
You want to know what they’re really selling? Surrogate masculinity. Masculinity unmoored from duty, generational continuity, or even real-world consequences. What they offer is a hollow, anesthetized masculinity: dopamine schedules, journaling routines, five-hour morning rituals — but no sons, no daughters, no wives, no lineage. This is not wisdom. It’s a simulation.
And millions of young men, starved of fathers, swallow it whole.
Where are the podcasts about building families, holding down difficult relationships, sacrificing for children, standing up for tradition? The algorithm doesn’t reward those. It rewards slick, postmodern celibacy dressed as enlightenment.
Ferriss, Huberman, and Fridman are not countercultural sages. They are the ideal products of a dying civilization: libidinally spent, spiritually castrated, generationally irrelevant.
And what does it say about us — that we’ve enthroned them as our guides?
I would call this the ultimate psyop: a priesthood of hyper-individualist eunuchs preaching salvation through narcissistic self-improvement, leading us away from real, rooted life into the infinite loop of personal branding, quantified selfhood, and “high performance” — but not legacy.
Let that sink in.
Do you want to follow men who optimize their testosterone — or men who use it to build a future?
EdgeDimi retweeted
Also anyone calling out people for being wrong has probably never taken real risk in their life -- or they would understand that being wrong is part of the game.
Who cares if a guy was wrong two years ago? Traders are wrong all the time.
EdgeDimi retweeted
I swear that 99.9% of the time, refreshing and waiting for the "announcement" with your mouse on market buy never pays off.
Waste of time and energy, almost every time.
EdgeDimi retweeted
I don’t think people quite understand how currencies price in rate differentials and how they get expressed in carry trades.
To no surprise, the reprise of there being no such thing as a free lunch rings true in FX.
If you think that the fed cutting this week will only get priced into something like USDJPY once it occurs, then let me tell you a bit about no arbitrage forward pricing lol. The reason Yen is at $140 is because it’s been pricing these moves down to 3% on US Fed Funds lol. To make marginal money on rate differentials here you need to make a bet on either more cuts than what’s priced in implied rates by the fed, or more hikes than what’s priced by the BoJ.
No such thing as a free ride. Can’t see a cut and then buy Yen and ride it for free based on that cut, sorry. The forwards already have that baked in
EdgeDimi retweeted
Twitter pontificators bet the farm on one possible outcome and own it (e.g we're going into a recession)
But that isn't how you should trade/manage risk
Traders will hold multiple potential outcomes in their head at once and weight them differently, and may have multiple positions on that do well in different outcomes, with the goal of minimizing their downside if wrong, and maximizing their upside if they're right.
That sort of framework is impossible to articulate in a single tweet and is why you often see people get frustrated at some of the excellent traders here for "flip flopping"
People want a singular simple narrative arc that's like a movie but in reality trading is inherently the exact opposite of that if you want to survive it for a long time.
At its core I think this dynamic is what drivers so much of the hostility you see in market media spaces
EdgeDimi retweeted
"Where are the stops?"
The answer to this question alone can get you far in trading.






















