The student-edited Emory Law Journal has published academic, professional, and student-authored pieces on the full range of legal subjects since 1978.
Emory University School of Law
Joined November 2014
- Tweets477
- Following425
- Followers976
- Likes169
Professor Joshua Braver (University of Wisconsin Law School) has published “Deference Due? ‘Considers’ and the Insurrection Act” in Volume 76 of the Emory Law Journal.
Read the article here: scholarlycommons.law.emory.e…
Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (Stanford Law School) has published “Government Research Funding and the First Amendment” in Volume 76 of the Emory Law Journal.
Read the article here: scholarlycommons.law.emory.e…
Emory Law Journal is excited to publish the first issue of Volume 76!
Read the issue here: scholarlycommons.law.emory.e…
Issue 1 features two Articles: First, “Government Research Funding and the First Amendment” by Professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (Stanford Law School). Second, “Deference Due? ‘Considers’ and the Insurrection Act” by Professor Joshua Braver (University of Wisconsin Law School).
Congratulations to Beverley Thompson! Her Comment, “Making Environmental Cancer Risk Legally Visible: Legal Epidemiology, Chemical Regulation, and the Failures of Cancer Cluster Investigations,” was recently published in Volume 75 of the Emory Law Journal.
Check it out here: scholarlycommons.law.emory.e…
Congratulations to Muntasir Ali! His Comment, “A Compulsory License Is Not Enough: How Implementing A Statutory Limit Can Reduce Costs and Increase Creativity in Music Sampling,” was recently published in Volume 75 of the Emory Law Journal.
Check it out here: scholarlycommons.law.emory.e…
A single stimulation cycle of IVF medications can cost more than $16,000 at retail, and insurance rarely covers it.
Check out the article here: scholarlycommons.law.emory.e…
In “Unlikely Criminals: Inside the IVF Drug Grey Market,” Professor Maybell Romero is the first legal scholar to document the grey market where patients buy and sell prescription fertility drugs through informal online communities to afford IVF treatment.
Recently, 23andMe, the flagship direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic company filed for bankruptcy, transferring the genetic information of thirteen million customers to the winning bidder, TTAM.
Check out the article here: scholarlycommons.law.emory.e…
Professor Anya E.R. Prince considers in “Genes for Sale!” published in Volume 75 of the Emory Law Journal.
Though not the first DTC company to file for bankruptcy, 23andMe’s dissolution raises important questions about what more can be done to protect the sensitive data of consumers.
Since West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court’s major questions doctrine (“MQD”) has been used to check agency power over questions of “great political or economic significance.” But what about questions viewed as less important?
Check out the article here: scholarlycommons.law.emory.e…
Professor Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr. and Honorable A. Richard M. Blaiklock consider in “Renormalizing the Nondelegation Doctrine” published in Volume 75 of the Emory Law Journal.
