Sola Virtus Dei. Christian Nationalist. Presbyterian. Husband. Father. American.
Joined November 2024
- Tweets6K
- Following1.2K
- Followers1.5K
- Likes86K
Pinned Tweet
I’m excited to start a new community centered around Septuagint discussion! Join us to explore what Christ and His Disciples referenced!
nitter.cf/i/communities/19435372…
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
If the average papist could read, Rome would probably collapse in about a day:
Matthew 16:17–18 (ESV):
»And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”«
“This” appears twice in the Christ’s reply to Peter (who had just confessed that Jesus is, indeed, “the Christ, the Son of the living God”); it references the same thing in both cases. In the Greek, the first instance is implied (this is natural in the Greek, but unnatural in English) and the second is explicit. A Koine Greek reader or hearer (of sufficient intelligence, anyway) would have immediately recognized the second ‘this’ (ουτος) as referring to the same thing as the (implied) first ‘this’: Peter’s confession.
The Rock upon which the Church is founded is Christ, and Peter’s confession of Christ is metonymically or synecdochically identical to Christ Himself. There are dozens of ways in which it can be clearly demonstrated from the Scriptures that Peter is not, personally, the Rock upon which the Church is founded. Here are just a few:
1. Christ calls the Apostles (plural) and the Prophets the foundation (Ephesians 2:20).
2. It is clearly stated (in a number of places, e.g., 1 Corinthians 3:11) that Christ Himself is, indeed, the Rock.
3. Peter is not even the Apostle to the non-Jewish nations, for that role was bestowed upon Paul (Romans 11:13).
Peter himself, undoubtedly, understood what Christ was saying, as he never called himself the Rock upon which the Church is founded (and also he probably noticed that “rock” [πετρα] is feminine and Peter was, well, not); in fact, Peter himself clearly affirms that Christ is the cornerstone and rock of offense (1 Peter 2).
And there is also the fact that Scripture itself contains the narrative of the first council ever called (Acts 15), and Peter did not preside; rather, it is James, the brother of Christ, who renders the judgement, and the decision is sent in the name of the church, not Peter.
Peter is not unimportant, certainly, but he is not the Rock upon which the Church is founded, and he would probably punch you in the mouth for saying so.
My children are Whites and they will create White families in White households. End of story. Non-negotiable.
"Every actress is a little Holmes who never gets caught because her con is legal"
The person who came out of the documentary looking the worst unambiguously is Amanda seyfried
She’s THE villain: a cold, ruthless, unconscious, rosy-cheeked sexual manipulator
Every actress is a little Holmes who never gets caught because her con is legal
7
618
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
You're wrong about WW2 and the "Nazi" myths, but that involves a lot of layered propaganda that's difficult to disentangle. You need to understand things like memory conformity, the development of the story, et cetera.
But there is ZERO, and I mean ZERO, even prima facie case you could possibly make that rejecting a white peace from Imperial Germany in April of 1915, was a good thing.
archive.nytimes.com/iht-retr…
- You can claim the talk about the Belgian Congo are absurd, or that you disagree with the refusal to indemnify Belgium.
There are two problems with these "objections"
1. This is an opening pitch from Germany. If the British wanted peace, they could at least agree to talks and try to talk Germany down. The British refused any talks whatsoever.
It is standard practice to enter negotiations demanding more than you really want.
To refuse ANY peace talks whatsoever on the basis of Germany's opening gambit is a bloodthirsty form of dishonesty.
2. These demands, even if unreasonable and the Germans unwilling to budge on them - hardly constitute an existential threat to anyone.
This reality needs to be stated openly and plainly. There was no existential threat to France, or Russia, or the British Empire, or even Belgium. If you're super-concerned about Serbia (moreso than Britain was in the 1940s, first couping them and using them as a speedbump against Hitler in 1941, then handing them over to Stalin in 1945), well - maybe FUCKING TALK about it like a HUMAN BEING, not some war-death-golem.
There's one explanation for why Britain refused talks of any sort: they were worried that the Germans would agree to something sensible.
And when you go back to World War 2 - there are all of these "reasons" for that war.
You say Hitler violated the Munich agreement, therefore he cannot be trusted. I invite you to pull your head from your ass and actually read it (it's not long).
encyc.org/wiki/Text_of_the_M…
Hitler didn't exercise his right to plebiscites on additional territories by the way.
Hitler also never promised no more territorial expansion, that was a deliberate mistranslation of a speech which - in case you didn't know - wouldn't constitute a treaty violation anyway!
I'm sorry if Chamberlain impressed his hallucinations of what Hitler agreed to onto the British public.
Think of it like this: how do we know the US Civil War wasn't about slavery?
Because if it were, Lincoln would sent an ultimatum to the CSA saying "free the slaves and we'll recognize the CSA".
Now, what "freedom" means, and the logistics of it all are something tremendous to work out, but broad strokes - if slavery was the problem, then work to solve the problem.
Okay, if the occupation of Czechia was a problem, then Henderson and Halifax ought to have approached Hitler and said to leave Czechia.
What would have been the downside to doing so? If Hitler says "no", then you're back where you started. If Hitler says "yes", but doesn't follow through, well now you have real evidence of Hitler's untrustworthiness AND you've likely reduced the integration of Czechia into the German war economy at least slightly.
And if Hitler says "yes" and follows through, well - then the problem that Chamberlain, Churchill, Henderson and Halifax were screaming bloody murder that they just cared so fucking much about - would be solved!
Or, and this is often brought up, "The Nazis secured 35 divisions worth of military equipment from the Czechs".
Well first of all, that's strong evidence of Hitler's claim that Czechia lay as a dagger deep inside Germany, ready to strike at any moment of Germany's preoccupation. But second off - if that equipment is TRULY a concern, then ask for that military equipment to be redistributed between Britain, France and Germany. The worst that could happen is Hitler says no.
There is an enormous volume of negative space, what the British DIDN'T DO, that evidences what they truly wanted: another death war against Germany.
There were no overtures to actually solve the issues that the British supposedly cared about.
Emil Hacha requires a guarantee of independence from Britain. Not only is he told "no", he's told by Halifax to travel to Berlin and make a deal with Germany. Halifax knew precisely what he was doing.
Then, instead of trying to set up some sort of arrangement wrt Czechia, Britain immediately fires off war guarantees to Poland, Hungary, Romania and Yugoslavia.
Incidentally, the guarantee bound Britain to war with Poland even if Poland was deemed the aggressor, though Beck didn't directly invade Germany proper - as that would put Britain in an awkward position.
Instead he occupies Danzig. Technically, as a member of the League of Nations, Britain was bound to go to war WITH POLAND to uphold the sovereignty of Danzig.
The opening shots of the German invasion was an obsolete German dreadnought firing on Polish positions in Danzig.
On September 2, Hitler agreed to a ceasefire and mediation with Mussolini. This is not what someone determined to conquer Poland would do - you don't halt an offensive right off the jump if you had some long-range goal of conquering Poland.
But as we know, Beck rejected peace, and the next day Britain and France declared war, starting the war that would kill millions of Europeans, hand over half of Europe to Stalin, with the British refusing to even entertain the possibility of peace.
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
The 5 virgins were wise not only for procuring sufficient oil, but for refusing to share it.
Not because they were hoarding it all for themselves.
But because they would not abandon their duty to the Bridegroom to appease fools.
May Christians remember wisdom.
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
When you pray “Thy kingdom come” you are asking God to execute His rule over all things in such a way that is most conducive to establishing His eternal kingdom of glory.
The demographic whose sole purpose is delivering food for pennies cheaper thinks we would starve without them btw
You posted this and have never apologized
Let me spell out just exactly what you’re saying here. You are explicitly saying that Americans are too stupid to deliver food, and if the food wasn’t delivered to them they are too stupid to provide food for themselves
Let me remind you that it is YOU and YOUR family who came to MY nation that was built by MY family because YOUR nation was so dysfunctional it couldn’t figure out how to spread wealth and freedom to its people in the easiest time in world history to obtain wealth and grant freedom
If it weren’t for the kindness and compassion of AMERICANS you would be eating shit burgers in your tin hut. And your response is to mock them and disparage them
Good riddance you disgusting piece of filth
12
180
Enemy.
If Republican organizations are going to call fellow Republican patriots “demon worshippers,” we deserve to lose.
I’m Catholic. I’ve heard the same crap about my own faith from people who couldn’t tell you what Catholics actually believe. You’d think we’d know better than to turn around and do it to Sikhs.
Sikhs worship one God and reject idol worship. And the Catholic Church, which teaches that the fullness of religious life is found in Christ, also teaches that we should recognize what is true and holy in other faiths.
We have enough trouble persuading people to vote Republican. Why the hell are we picking fights with the people who already do?
2
80
698
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
Never forget: When you are arguing with a faggot, you are actually arguing with their butt parasites. And their butt parasites cannot hear you and they don’t care.
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
Take a walk through any major American city I don’t think you can call them “theories” anymore
Leaked emails reveal Stephen Miller exchanged over 900 messages with Breitbart News promoting white nationalist theories.
ALT I'm sorry, I can't identify or describe this person.
ALT A group of people in dark clothing and hats march in formation, holding multiple U.S. flags and Confederate flags. Some wear face coverings and brown pants. One individual carries a shield. They are outdoors near a large building on a clear day.
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
Her: Open up to me, dear. What's your deepest desire?
Me: ....
Her: You can. I love you.
Me: Okay. You know that time when Jerusalem was surrounded by the Assyrians, and the Lord sent the angel and slaughtered 185,000 in the night?
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
Second and third order effects; welcome to the Insurgency.
Now is the appropriate time for Build-up. I’m not asking for or promoting pointless insurrection. That Jan 6th thing was retarded. I’m giving you the keys to government transformation, even though legal Constitutional means.
An insurgency (even a peaceful one) is pointless without first selecting new leadership. We currently have a 2 year window to find those people. They are commonly known in UW terms as the Underground. They may be public figures or hidden leaders. In addition to political leadership, principled Lawyers and Judges are needed for the very public struggle. The Underground also run Information Operations/ messaging.
Many Conservatives look at leftist organizers and say, “that’s not how we do things.” That’s foolish. Even the US Army examined and modeled the Phases of an Insurgency off how Mao successfully accomplished his. Networking and coordination are universal principles.
In military planning, evaluating second and third order effects are a critical part of planning. “If I blow up this bridge, how does that alter my own movement or change the lives of the civilian populace that I need to win over?” These very questions should be applied to tactics on our side. How might proliferation of previously NFA restricted items confuse or make their confiscation more difficult? Let’s look at the model pushed by the left with both marijuana pseudo-legalization and importation of millions of illegal aliens for the answer. “Oh, but the gun laws might change.” What is the Supreme Law of the land? Any time you fail to resist an illegal law, even in a trivial way, you de facto empower it and negate the US Constitution. If everyone refuses to follow an illegal mandate, it’s no rule at all. There are never enough cops to catch all speeders, therefore weigh the risks and keep your eyes open.
The next component to an Insurgency is the Auxiliary. These are the support element, the saboteurs, the logistics people. Truck drivers, and electricians are just as important. The left uses street movements and disruptions to gain advantage. The right needs the same capabilities, even if it’s never employed.
Financiers: these may fall under the Underground or Auxiliary. The left has Soros & Singham, until recent years they operated in the shadows. We need our own. The American Revolution had Haym Salomon. We need Constitution loving, patriotic Americans who are willing to trickle money into the just cause of defending our nation. The left and right both use obfuscation through PAC’s and SuperPAC’s to bundle and hide money towards their own means. It’s time that the same is done to preserve the Constitution.
The final component to a well established Insurgency is the Guerrilla Force. These are the fighters who can be called upon if necessary. The American Revolution had the militia. I’m not advocating for violence, but rather preparedness. Under 10 U.S. Code § 246 this is already legally defined. I’m just asking you to follow the law and ensure you are up to the requirement. Train, buy appropriate arms and ammunition. Build networks. The G Force always lives in obscurity until it is called upon. It should always be a last resort, but without the option on the table, everything else is flaccid.
2028 may yield entirely different political results. That’s no reason to eschew preparation to defend the Constitution. I prefer to have elected officials who are doing at least a few of the things I want, but that hasn’t been common over my lifetime. I grew up in the Punk scene and later became a Green Beret. Being the underdog is kind of like a warm blanket, it’s old & familiar.
Nothing I’ve just conveyed is classified information. Recognize the leftists successful insurgency activities and borrow them in case we need to activate our own. I’m not “MAGA” I’m something far more Conservative and American Right-wing than that.
Pray for the best and prepare for the worst.
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
America was built by White men, for White men. If it wasn’t for the generosity of White men, you’d be stuck in some middle eastern shithole right now, getting beaten by your petty tyrant husband for having the audacity to read or some other insane barbarian charge.
Yet rather than thanking White men for letting you parasitize our homeland, you denounce the very people who built it and graciously allow you to share in its freedoms, even at their own detriment.
You can call that racist. It doesn’t make you any less a beneficiary of it. And it won’t do you any good when we send you back.
☩ Encouraged Zoomer ☩ retweeted
A message to the GOP:
Our children’s future, inheritance, and lives are at stake. These low iq foreign hordes that YOU allowed to invade our nation and that YOU refused to remove and that YOU pander to hate and envy our children. They openly talk about killing them and “taking their stuff” when they gain power and the majority. To say nothing of what they think and say about our country, its great history, and its heroes.
This is not a game. There will be no debates or compromises. We now hold the keys to your kingdom.
If you want any form of “political” solutions within the existing system you will embrace the White man and give the young White men in particular the power over the party. The Israel-ass-kissing days are over. The minority pandering is over. The all-talk, no-action days are over.
We have the balls to do and say what you are too cowardly, too blackmailed, or too bought and paid for to do. We are offering you a clean exit. Take what you grifted and retire into the sunset. Hang up your hats. Pass the baton.
If we don’t start getting calls, being treated with respect, being gifted with patronage, and given control of the ship you can expect an even worse outcome in 2028 and beyond. We will see to it that you lose power permanently until such time that we take control of the party anyway due to the attrition in your ranks.
We can do this the easy way or we can do this the hard way, the choice is yours. You’ve created a situation so dire for our young men that they have nothing left to lose. You will not win a game of chicken with us.
You know where to reach us.
If you want the White man's vote you will appeal to our interests. Republicans can't even summon the courage to say the word "White." Throw away all of your focus group data, fire all the consultants, and ignore all of the Think Tank papers. We're taking the wheel of the party now and we'll gladly drive the bus off a cliff if you will not meet the demands and interests of our people.