Pinned Tweet
The media reports insinuating involvement of my yellow rubber boat in the Nord Stream sabotage are misleading, Here's the original expedition video by Agnes Andersson.
Erik Andersson 🐘 retweeted
A must watch.
@Erkperk makes his mark as well. 👍🏼
Die Sprengung der Nordstream-Pipeline hat die Haupt-Schlagader für günstige Energie zerstört und die deutsche Wirtschaft massiv geschädigt.
Der Erfolgs-Regisseur Moritz Enders ("Toxic NATO") untersucht in seinem neuen Dokumentarfilm "Nordstream - Die Sprengung" (nordstreamfilm.de) die Hintergründe, mögliche Täter und die bis heute andauernde, massive Propaganda um den Vorfall.
Es war mir eine Ehre und eine große Freude, gemeinsam mit Ray McGovern, Dirk Pohlmann, Prof. Theodore Postol, Dr. Werner Rügemer, Prof. Ola Tunander, Erik Andersson und Harald Kujat an der Aufklärung mitwirken zu dürfen.
Die schweizer Zeitung Infosperber hat einen Artikel zum Film verfasst: infosperber.ch/politik/nords…
Folgen Sie mir auf Telegram: t.me/drjonastoegel
True
In my latest article, I offer the most exhaustive critical analysis to date of the “Russian hybrid war” narrative.
What I show is that many of the most widely publicised cases of supposed Russian “hybrid warfare” — von der Leyen’s jammed plane, the Baltic cable cuts, the DHL crash in Vilnius, the Heathrow fire, the wave of drone sightings that swept Europe in the autumn of 2025, the Romanian TikTok campaign — turned out to be media-amplified speculation that collapsed under basic scrutiny. Yet almost every day, new claims are made – with little or no evidence ever provided.
Ultimately, serious scrutiny of the “Russian hybrid warfare” narrative can only lead to one disquieting conclusion. A “hybrid war” is indeed being waged against Europe — but it is being waged by the EU-NATO establishment itself, against its own population.
Europeans are being subjected to a sustained campaign of cognitive or psychological warfare aimed at conditioning them to believe that Europe is under attack from Russia, and that these hybrid attacks are a prelude to conventional hostilities — a claim for which, by and large, there is little or no proof. What the record points to, in fact, is a deliberate campaign of threat inflation in which governments, media outlets and defence-funded “think tanks” have colluded to instil a permanent sense of fear in the population, through relentless coverage of “incidents”, “attacks”, “sabotages” and “campaigns” that, in most cases, simply do not exist.
Read the article here: thomasfazi.com/p/the-russian…
Very important message form the Slovak prime minister. He's right about what's going on.
I AM NOT, AND WILL NEVER BE, AMONG THOSE LOOKING FOR A PRETEXT FOR WAR BETWEEN NATO AND RUSSIA
I respect that Czech President Petr Pavel, as a former NATO general, would like to fight. I would therefore appreciate it if he respected the fact that I prefer peace.
Czech President Petr Pavel, whom I have always treated with respect and due regard as the head of the sovereign Czech Republic, often tends to comment on my work. This time, he took issue with my position on attempts to provoke a military conflict between NATO and Russia.
I understand that, as a former NATO general, he would like to fight. I expect him to respect my commitment to pursuing peace. Let me therefore repeat once again, so that there can be no doubt:
1️⃣ The West’s military rhetoric and the search for a pretext for a military conflict with Russia are intended to distract from the liberal world’s inability to address basic challenges such as the price and availability of energy and fuel, as well as illegal migration.
2️⃣ As long as I am Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic, I will not agree to Slovak soldiers taking part in any military adventure provoked by anyone within NATO.
3️⃣ In the event of an actual armed attack against one or more NATO member states, the relevant Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty provides NATO members with several options for demonstrating solidarity.
Erik Andersson 🐘 retweeted
#Nordstream
Erik confirms an impression that I, too, have noticed. Burba and Chervinsky both fall from grace following the disastrous Wagnergate and Kanatove operations. The Ukrainian prosecutor’s office is investigating. Burba drives off in a CIA-sponsored van and ...
Danish podcast @frihedsbrevet largely confirms @bopanc 's account of Nord Stream attacks based on an interview with James Reed, a key source to mainstream media on Nord Stream. Some details caught my eye. Reed says the USA created a "Frankenstein Monster" that went rogue. 🧵
Danish podcast @frihedsbrevet largely confirms @bopanc 's account of Nord Stream attacks based on an interview with James Reed, a key source to mainstream media on Nord Stream. Some details caught my eye. Reed says the USA created a "Frankenstein Monster" that went rogue. 🧵
Replying to @frihedsbrevet
Hmmm
Under optagelser til en stjernespækket film om Nord Stream-sabotagen blev en dykker fra virkelighedens sabotage pludselig anholdt. Ifølge vores oplysninger boede han på samme luksushotel som filmholdet.
@mannescheef er helt tæt på den utrolige historie.
frihedsbrevet.dk/under-optag…
"Iceman", the Nord Stream bomber who was caught and released in Poland, has now been caught again in Kroatia.
spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/a…
Erik Andersson 🐘 retweeted
A good read on Nord Stream;
🔸Col. Roman Chervinsky and Gen. Vasyl Burba: Ukrainian intelligence officers with deep CIA ties since 2014, are identified as masterminds. The operation used civilian divers, the patriotic idiots, due to a lack of specialized personnel.
🔸It is absolutely logical that the CIA/MI6 used Ukraine as a proxy to destroy German-Russian energy infrastructure while maintaining deniability. Ukraine was the "ideal fall guy"; corrupt, distant, & expendable.
🔸The Ukraine sabotage mindset extends beyond Nord Stream; the same team attempted to blow up the TurkStream pipeline in the Black Sea. The operation was curated by a rogue faction of former SBU/GUR officers fired by Zelensky, working with army chief Zaluzhny, private businessmen, and the CIA station chief in Kiev.
🔸Moscow initially blamed the US, citing Seymour Hersh, but switched in late 2024 to blaming "Ukrainian saboteurs curated by the CIA. after Russian senator Andrey Derkach leaked a secret SBU memo on the operation.
🔸The leak allegedly came from Zelensky's administration to discredit political rival Zaluzhny and expose Chervinsky/Burba to European law enforcement.
"Nord Stream -Die Sprengung", has sold out four times in the legendary Berlin Babylon theatre! Grumpy critics say it's Russian propaganda. Both @MichaKobs and I are a bit biased since we have contributed to the film, but watch it and decide for yourself! Link in the thread,
#NordStream
Viermal war das Kino Babylon nun ausverkauft und nun fühlt sich ein Filmkritiker berufen, die altbekannten Geister zu beschwören bzw. die Totschlag-Keule zu ziehen. Er räumt jedoch Detailreichtum ein, was der Theorie einer Verschwörungstheorie zuwiderläuft.
The bit in bold below is remarkable: Last month Judge Moulder of London Commercial court ruled that Nord Stream should not get paid because the sabotage was an act of war. Now, Moulder refused permission to appeal. Nord Stream now has until 4pm on 21 August 2026 to seek permission directly from the Court of Appeal (an extended CPR 52.12 deadline). And there's a remarkable costs provision: Nord Stream must pay £2,121,000 on account of the insurers' costs — but into the Court Funds Office, not to the insurers, because the insurers themselves raised the concern that receiving money from the Gazprom-majority claimant might breach sanctions. The money sits in court until they confirm no impediment or obtain licences.
Here's an index of released documents with links and analysis. My opinion is that Moulder's ruling is absurd because it accepts a definition of war so broad that any insurance against terrorism (which NS had and paid for) becomes worthless. dropbox.com/scl/fi/33gvfduaa…
Thoughtful and interesting take
I think you can be anti-Russia and still a somewhat intelligent and morally coherent person. There are people in whose ethnic, religious or even financial interest it is to be anti-Russian and support war against Russia. They are just normal adversaries. Sometimes you gotta kill them when it comes to that but that's life. However, I don't believe that you can be sincerely pro-Ukrainian and still a good person. Actually supporting the Kiev regime and believing they're "the good guys" (sincerely, not for personal profit or purely anti-Russia reasons) means that you are morally defective and evil, or such a stupid NPC biodrone that you're basically outside of any ethical consideration.















