Males have a significant physical advantage over females. That is just science. No hormones or surgery can negate the advantage. #TruthIsNotACrime #TruthIsNotAHateCrime #FactIsNotHate #MenAreNotWomen #WomenAreNotMen

Since the Supreme Court ruling, and now the EHRC draft Code of Practice, the response from too many self-described progressives has been revealing. Instead of defending women’s sex-based rights, they attack the feminists who do. Instead of recognising the words woman, female, mother, sister, daughter, grandmother, as the language of material reality, they insist on reducing women to “cis women”, as though women are merely a subset of their own sex. These are the handmaidens of an ideology that asks women to participate in their own erasure. They call it inclusion. They call it kindness. They call it progress. But there is nothing progressive about stripping women of the words, boundaries and legal protections through which their oppression is understood and their safety defended. Women are not an identity group within their own sex. They are the sex. Their rights are not conditional on the feelings of men, and their spaces are not bigotry made concrete. Reem Alsalem, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, stood before the Human Rights Council and delivered a statement that would have been entirely unremarkable in any previous decade, but which now carried the weight of something almost heretical. She said that erasing women and women-specific language based on their sex is not only wrong, but demeaning, regressive, and constitutes one of the worst forms of violence that women and girls can experience. She went further. She told the assembled representatives of the world’s nations that she had never imagined she would need to write a report simply to establish that women and girls are biological and legal categories defined by sex, and that sex is central to understanding discrimination and violence against them. Read that again. A United Nations official had to formally argue, in 2025, that women exist as a biological category. She warned that erasing sex-based language weakens protections for motherhood, produces flawed data, undermines services for victims, obscures violence against women, and makes it harder to protect girls. She closed with a line that deserves to be inscribed somewhere prominent: “You cannot protect what you cannot define.” @UNSRVAW Reem Alsalem told the UN Human Rights Council See less #WomenAreNotCis #SexBasedRights #RealityMatters #SexMatters