DarkRift

I have more than a few things to say about @SkywatcherHQ, the new @GarryPNolan interview, and SOL, so read the entire post if you wanna know my thoughts, And I'm not gonna apologize for continuing to bring this up, because Jake said it: "Who is operating [UAP]? How are they being operated? Where are they coming from? We should be able to answer those questions, probably entirely, in the next 12 months." ~@jakebarber2025 - January 2025 @rosscoulthart conducted that excellent interview. Has Ross pushed Jake for an explanation on that bold statement, now that we're ten months down the road? If not, why not? Did anybody at the @_SolFoundation conference ask Barber about it and get an update? If Jake wants to back down on that and tell us he got too excited and overpromised, he's free to do so on here. I watched the interview @ufouapam did with @GarryPNolan. They (Skywatcher) are working on getting out new data within the next several months. It's coming, but there have been some delays. Nolan: "The file structures are incredibly complex and, unfortunately, the radar-operator company is not telling us exactly how to decode their file structures. They're just being obstinate. And that's nobody's fault except the radar company who made the instrument. I'm perplexed as to why that's the case because they sold us the radar (laughs)." ~ Shifting gears...I'm (again) going to steal an idea from @joeljewitt: If Skywatcher wants to prove that psionic folks can summon UAP, or that @james_fowler_'s dog whistle can summon UAP on command, 100% of the time, then show up in Vegas and do your thing at @SphereVegas. Dr. Avi Loeb said that @GalileoProject1 has their camera systems on the roof, and two other systems around that area so they can triangulate whatever shows up. I'm all for science, data and peer-review, but this is a simple and instant way to show the world that you can do what you claim. So why not do it and livestream it for everyone to see? And when is that public event taking place that Jake spoke about? Is that not happening? If so, why not? Also, are they going to land a craft like Jake claimed they could do? Or is the U.S. government now so intertwined with, and in control of, Skywatcher, that they're calling the shots on what they can and can't do? If that's the case, we're going backwards. I understand Fowler needs to make money to support his family and is using his detection and sensor systems to do that by selling his services to government entities. But, if his UAP dog whistle really works 100% of the time, as has been claimed, that WILL change the world. So why isn't it being done? He can't have his company AND show off the dog whistle? What am I missing? And if you jump in here and say, "It's a grift," expect to be blocked. I'm very open to the idea that these claims aren't just made up bs, but we need to see it. Doing what Joel (and now me stealing his idea) said at Sphere is the quickest and most obvious way to do that. Some of the videos we've seen thus far are interesting but not conclusive to prove that the objects are anomalous. And let's not forget that @MvonRen said that he told the Skywatcher folks, on camera, that they should look into some of the objects, potentially, being birds, and that was edited out of the final Skywatcher video. Why? Is that something they didn't want their potential investors to see? If so, that's not a good look. Nolan also spoke about how someone at SOL was mad that he brought up CE-5 because it's, "unscientific." Well, too bad. As Garry said, CE-5 has been around for decades and it's part of the story. I'm more than open on that, and now with Skywatcher making similar claims, it needs to be tested as much as possible. Break out the psionics and dog whistle and come to Vegas!