GMOScience (@GMOScience) header
GMOScience (@GMOScience) profile picture

Examine the effects of GMOs & their associated pesticides with a lens on education towards health regeneration. A 501(c)(3), founded 2014.

California
Joined December 2008
Photo by GMOScience (@GMOScience)Photo by GMOScience (@GMOScience)Photo by GMOScience (@GMOScience)Photo by GMOScience (@GMOScience)Photo by GMOScience (@GMOScience)Photo by GMOScience (@GMOScience)Photo by GMOScience (@GMOScience)Photo by GMOScience (@GMOScience)Photo by GMOScience (@GMOScience)
This dog is not burying the bone. The FDA asked the right questions about genetically engineered dairy, but gave them a "no questions" GRAS letter. Have a read, watch our next episode of @TheNew_MDS Nov. 10, 12 Noon PST. My CSI/FDA article: michelleperromd337477.substa…
1
2
91
Are you kidding me? No questions asked, @FDA? @SecKennedy, did you see this? GRAS approval for synbio milk, shown to have 236 fungal proteins and 93 unknowns in a recent study. We've been sold out. Advice? AVOID. My article in comments. foodnavigator.com/Article/20…
2
6
15
282
Thank you for your messages! Some explanations about this newly released Frankenfood, generally recognized as safe (GRAS), without any FDA testing: Precision fermentation is a form of biotechnology in which microorganisms such as yeast, fungi, or bacteriaare genetically engineered to produce a specific substance, such as a protein, enzyme, fat, vitamin, or flavoring. The engineered microorganisms are grown in fermentation tanks, and the desired substance is then harvested and processed for use in food or other products. The word “precision” refers to the intended genetic engineering and target product; it does not mean that the fermentation process produces only that substance or that the finished ingredient is necessarily pure. In one synbio milk studied, only 7 of 69 measured bovine-milk nutrients were detected and at low levels. The same study found 236 fungal proteins and 93 unidentified compounds that are fermentation-derived compounds. Your immune system could go haywire trying to identify them and protect you from untoward reactions. We don't know the effects on you or your children because it wasn't studied and given the GRAS determination. Velamuri R, Yertha T, Fagan J. Scientific Reports. 2026;16. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38994-7.
1
1
54
Thank you, @NicHulscher, for inspiring me to write this substack. As a student of genetic engineering for nearly 25 years, I was equally concerned by this study. michelleperromd337477.substa… nature.com/articles/s41586-0…
1
4
100
PARENTAL ALERT: Thank you to Informed Choice Iowa and my friend/farmer/advisor, Howard Vlieger, telling me about a movie I had to watch! It inspired this substack today on surveillance and our kids: michelleperromd337477.substa…
71
Targeted with aerial microbes by the US Army; accounting for the early flu season -- encouraging 'flu vaccine uptake'? youtube.com/shorts/htnTlAfIP… I wrote this article: atmospheric modification affectsinfant development and what families can do about it. michelleperromd337477.substa…
1
3
237
Yet another reason to love our kids!
1
4
174
Philadelphia and Colorado Children’s Hospital’s. Where else?
2
3
135
Thank you @nontoxmom for this great weekend musing!
3
1
21
373
PARENTAL ALERT: Continuing in the nutritional space of raising healthy children, I began an examination of mineral reserves and their effects on kids' biology. Have a read: michelleperromd337477.substa…
🤖 Made with AI
2
75
Agreed 100%!
I'm a Board Certified anesthesiologist and have been in practice for 24 years. I just learned that the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia where I trained has launched a program to increase flu vaccine uptake among children by vaccinating them while under anesthesia. The program is called "Close your Eyes. We'll Immunize" This is stunningly irresponsible. Here's why: Anesthetists are extremely risk avoidant and endeavor to minimize patient exposure to anything which carries potential side effects. This is particularly true of pediatric patients who very often have never been exposed to anesthetic medications. We simply cannot know how an individual child will respond to these drugs for the first time. Every single medication we administer during an operation can potentially trigger untoward or allergic responses. When this occurs our primary responsibility is to stabilize the patient. Our secondary responsibility is to identify the offending agent. There is absolutely no justification of introducing another agent, in this case a flu vaccine, which carries a risk of harm and contributes nothing to the success of the operation. Some of the more common side effects of flu vaccines are fever (11-16%) and less commonly, a rash (1%). There is also an non-zero risk of severe allergic reactions and high-grade fevers which can develop over the course of minutes. What if a child under anesthesia receives a vaccine and develops a rash and/or fever? Is it from the antibiotic that the surgeon requested? Is it from the narcotic? The anxiolytic? The barbiturate? Anesthetic gases can also (rarely) trigger a life threatening response called Malignant Hyperthermia which commonly presents as a high fever. Without subsequent testing we cannot know which agent was responsible. Most commonly the testing is never done and the child’s record will forever reflect the possibility that some or all of the drugs which were used are responsible for their reaction. This makes future anesthetic care significantly more challenging and will require the use of alternatives which may not be necessary. Advocating for a flu vaccine while a child is anesthetized reflects the pervasive yet inaccurate attitude among the medical establishment that vaccines are perfectly safe. I simply cannot believe that my mentors would have ever supported this initiative when I was a resident there. Close your eyes indeed.
1
2
9
297