Owen Gibbs retweeted
Man City received £949.94m in commercial income from Abu Dhabi sponsors between 2009-2018. Only £119.25m came from sponsors -- the remaining £830.69m were "Tagged Sums" paid by Abu Dhabi United Group (City's owners)
You get longer for spicy tweets. #twotierjustice
NEW: A smirking Sudanese asylum seeker set fire to a hotel in Bradford while 170 people were inside.
Mohammed Abdalla, whose mugshot shows him smirking, has received a sentence of two years and seven months in prison.
Via @Daily_Express
It's worth noting that Manchester City fans paid actual money for a banner lauding the work of a high profile barrister.
The man in question, Lord Pannick, went on to win 1 (one) out a possible 115 charges.
Pannick in the streets of London, indeed.
Owen Gibbs retweeted
George Galloway posted this photo today with the caption "What if this was your Dad? #Gaza."
This man is not in Gaza and he is not Palestinian. He is Syrian, like me.
His name is Mohammed Mohiedin Anis, known as Abu Omar. AFP photographer Joseph Eid took this photo in March 2017, in the ruins of Abu Omar's bedroom in al-Shaar, eastern Aleppo, the neighborhood devastated in the regime's 2016 offensive to retake the city. Abu Omar was a collector of antiques and vintage cars. The war took his home and most of his collection. He came back anyway, sat on his bed in the rubble, lit his pipe and played a record. The whole world knew this picture as the face of Aleppo's destruction.
And Galloway knows exactly who destroyed Aleppo, because he was on their payroll.
In 2012, Galloway began hosting a show on Al Mayadeen, the Beirut channel that has never disclosed its backers and is widely seen as the voice of Iran's "Axis of Resistance." He was reportedly paid around £3,000 an episode. He also presented on Iran's state channel Press TV, and spent nearly a decade on Putin's RT.
The Axis: the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hezbollah, the Iraqi militias, the Houthis and, until December 2024, the Assad regime. For over 13 years after the 2011 uprising, Assad survived only because the IRGC, Hezbollah and Russia fought his war for him. When the regime finally collapsed, he fled to Moscow and was granted "humanitarian" asylum. The same humanity he denied every Syrian he bombed.
Who doesn't remember the barrel bombs on bakeries and markets? The sarin in Ghouta and Khan Sheikhoun? The chlorine in Douma?
Galloway remembers. On his show he called Assad "the last bastion of Arab dignity." When Assad gassed Douma in 2018, Galloway pushed the "staged attack" conspiracy, even though the OPCW confirmed chlorine was used.
None of this is new. This is the man who stood before Saddam Hussein in 1994 and saluted his "courage" and "indefatigability." He was suspended from the House of Commons after an inquiry found strong circumstantial evidence that Saddam's regime, with his connivance, used the Oil-for-Food program, meant to feed starving Iraqi children, to fund his Mariam Appeal campaign.
In 2014 he declared Bradford an "Israel-free zone": no Israeli goods, no Israeli academics, not even Israeli tourists. Police logged it as a hate incident.
Last year he flew to Tehran to accept an award named after Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, called him a "martyr," and boasted that his most treasured possession is Haniyeh's personal passport. Then he flew straight to Moscow to applaud Putin's Victory Day parade.
Today, the self-proclaimed anti-imperialist lives in what he calls "exile," broadcasting from Russia and China, lecturing the West about freedom.
This is not an honest mistake. It is the method of Galloway and his camp, and it is what they mean by "by any means necessary." When the truth doesn't serve the cause, you invent a new one. A Syrian father, ruined by Assad and his Iranian and Russian patrons, becomes a Gazan victim of Israel. The real killers get erased, and the propagandist who defended them on their payroll gets applause from a Western audience that never bothers to check.
Syrians remember who bombed Aleppo. They remember who went on TV to defend it.
Abu Omar is not your propaganda, shameless George.
@georgegalloway
"Do you apologise to football fans? The Premier League says 'sham' contracts, is this a 'sham' club?"
@RobHarris questions Man City chief executive Ferran Soriano after the club was found guilty of all charges related to Premier League's financial rules
trib.al/YimvoPJ
Owen Gibbs retweeted
When I wrote about this image rights sham for The Independent in 2018, Manchester City threatened to sue us and demanded I tweet out a personal apology on here. We fought them. They did not sue us.
City's sham is confirmed by the Premier League today independent.co.uk/sport/foot…
Owen Gibbs retweeted
"Of course. We can do what we want.”
That's the line, in the hacked emails published by Der Spiegel in 2018, that sums up the sense of entitlement that fuelled Manchester City's cheating under this ownership.
In the past, yes, you could do what you want, spend what you like. That was no longer sustainable in an era of clubs being bought by oligarchs, sovereign wealth funds and politicians with the wealth of a nation behind them. There are things I deeply dislike about FFP/PSR/SCR, but this #MCFC ownership model, among others, made financial regulation necessary. And then, as anyone who has read the material could have concluded even before the Premier League case began, they behaved like the rules shouldn't apply to them.
Personally I struggle with the Lance Armstrong talk. There is a huge difference between a) a cyclist pumping himself full of performance-enhancing drugs as part of what USADA called “the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping program that sport has ever seen”, and b) breaches of financial regulations. Yes there are parallels — financial doping, as Arsene Wenger called it — but there are considerable differences too. This desperation to portray #MCFC players, managers and staff (even supporters) as cheats? Not for me.
But the damage to City's reputation is enormous. And the Premier League must now accept that a huge chunk of its recent history will be tainted and overshadowed by the findings of its regulatory commission. The question of sanctions — and then, possibly, compensation claims — will be complicated and fiercely divisive. Turbulence lies ahead for the Premier League as well as for Manchester City. So much of what has happened in the Premier League since the early 2010s is now tainted. What we don't yet know is how the damage done might shape the future
nytimes.com/athletic/7631415…
Owen Gibbs retweeted
The stupidest thing is how transparent the cheating was. Man City were averaging £600m more in commercial income than Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea in the decade to 2020. It was stark raving obvious that those numbers could not be real for City’s global scale at that time.
Not looking good for #mancity.
BREAKING: Man City judgement published by Premier League here:
premierleague.com/en/news/47…
Owen Gibbs retweeted
If you missed this horror known as Slough’s borough council meeting of last week then here is the start of it!!😳😳😳😡
Grok’s findings! 👇
‘Yes. This is a real clip from a real Slough Borough Council meeting.
A full Council meeting was scheduled for Thursday 24 September 2026 at 7pm at Observatory House. That matches the on-screen date. The chamber, flags, civic mace, and layout in the video match the council chamber used for Slough’s formal meetings.’😳
Owen Gibbs retweeted
Terrorist allegedly uses tiny child as ‘human shield’ to transport weapons in shocking Gaza footage
Owen Gibbs retweeted
The BBC has removed its disgraceful article! …. For transparency my nails are currently painted autumnal brown. I genuinely had not realised this was cultural appropriation, could it be considered black face for nails?
I apologise for my thoughtless actions. However, if I remove the polish then I could be perpetuating “white supremacist standards of beauty”
Difficult to know my next move tbh 💅
This is an absolute DISGRACE of an article by the BBC!
Any white woman who dares to paint her nails in a colour is framed as committing cultural appropriation…
and if she has nude nails, or no colour the BBC prints the claim that this can perpetuate “white supremacist standards of beauty”.
They actually printed that!
So basically, no matter what I do to my NAILS I fail because I’m white?
Why should I ever be forced to pay for an organisation that prints stuff like this?
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpd7…
Owen Gibbs retweeted
Aber der Donbass!
Es wird behauptet: "Die Ukraine hat ab 2014 den Donbass, ein Gebiet mit russlandfreundlichen Menschen in der Ostukraine, beschossen. Es gab dort Tausende Opfer unter Zivilisten." Diese Behauptung ist falsch.
Richtig ist: Diese Behauptung wird von
russischer Seite gezielt als Vorwand für den Angriffskrieg gestreut. Es gab vor der russischen Invasion keine Bombardierung des Donbass
durch die Ukraine.
Immer wieder wird behauptet, die Ukraine sei verantwortlich für „15 000 Tote im Donbass“ seit 2014 und habe „die eigenen Leute“ bombardiert, sodass Russland „schützend eingreifen musste“. Das ist ein durch Wladimir Putin und Russland gezielt konstruierter Vorwand für den Krieg.
Russland verbreitet diese Falschinformationen im Rahmen der hybriden Kriegsführung besonders in Deutschland. Die Zahl „15 000“ stammt aus Aufrundungen der Schätzungen der Vereinten Nationen. Allerdings handelt es sich dabei nicht um Opfer angeblicher ukrainischer Angriffe. Die Zahlen der Vereinten Nationen gehen von etwa 3500 getöteten Zivilisten aus, etwa 4000 ukrainischen Soldaten, etwa 5500 Toten bei den von Russland angeleiteten bewaffneten Separatisten.
Es lässt sich bei den etwa 3500 zivilen Opfern im Donbass der Jahre 2014 und 2015 nicht genau sagen, ob sie sich auf einer Seite der Auseinandersetzung verorteten und ob diese Menschen „pro-ukrainisch“ oder „pro-russisch” waren.
Enthalten sind in der Zahl auch die 298 Passagiere des abgeschossenen Flugs MH17. Es ist besonders zynisch, die getöteten Menschen ausgerechnet der Ukraine anrechnen zu wollen angesichts der Tatsache, dass das Passagierflugzeug durch von Russland gesteuerte Separatisten mit russischen Flugabwehrraketen abgeschossen wurde.
Nach den Jahren 2014 und 2015 sank die Zahl der Opfer im Donbass. Laut dem letzten Bericht der Organisation für Sicherheit und Zusammenarbeit in Europa (OSZE) kamen 161 Zivilisten im Zeitraum von Januar 2017 bis Mitte September 2020 ums Leben – etwa gleich viele auf beiden Seiten. Etwa die Hälfte dieser Opfer starb durch Unfälle mit Minen und Blindgängern.
Es gab vor dem Beginn des russischen Großangriffs auf die Ukraine am 24. Februar 2022 keine „Bombardierungen“ der Zivilbevölkerung im Donbass durch die Ukraine und es gab auch keinerlei Pläne der Ukraine, den Donbass militärisch angreifen zu wollen.
Weder die OSZE-Beobachtermission, die mit dem Einverständnis Russlands seit 2014 die Lage beobachtete, noch der Bericht der Vereinten Nationen vom September 2021 sehen Anzeichen für einen Genozid oder gezieltes Vorgehen der Ukraine gegen die „pro-russische Zivilbevölkerung“.
Ein Bericht des UNHCR (Hochkommissariat der Vereinten Nationen für Flüchtlinge) vom Juli 2016 fasst zusammen: „Der bewaffnete Konflikt, der durch den Zustrom ausländischer Kämpfer und Waffen aus der Russischen Föderation angeheizt wird, ist für die meisten Verletzungen des Rechts auf Leben in der Ukraine in den letzten zwei Jahren verantwortlich.“
Die russische Propaganda hat die offizielle Gesamtzahl nach den Angaben der Vereinten Nationen auf „15 000“ aufgerundet und daraus entgegen der Sachlage propagandistisch „Opfer der ukrainischen Angriffe auf den Donbass“ gemacht. Bis heute wird diese Propaganda in Diskussionen um den russischen Angriffskrieg gegen die Ukraine und die ukrainische Selbstverteidigung ständig wiederholt. Durch Fakten ist sie nicht gedeckt.
If there's genocide in Gaza why are they showing buildings and not the bodies?
The front page of @ScotNational tomorrow is what every UK newspaper front page should look like.
But, as throughout the entirety of the genocide, it stands alone with a moral backbone, not afraid to tell the truth about the horrors the rest of the press whitewash.
Owen Gibbs retweeted
🚨 Police officers have been lectured about @Nigel_Farage and @RobertJenrick as part of a publicly funded training programme on “Islamophobia”.
At a hate crime conference, police officers attended a session in which comments made by the Reform UK leader — particularly his concerns about whether some young Muslims subscribe to British values — were compared with a racially aggravated offence.
North Yorkshire Police officers were reportedly asked to consider the “harm” caused by Mr Farage’s comments and told that if he had made similar remarks about Jewish people, he would be “locked up”.
The lecture formed part of a training programme called “Project Unity”, which has also been delivered to students, council staff and civil servants working on the Government’s counter-extremism programme, Prevent.
It is also reported that the session took issue with criticism by @SuellaBraverman and Robert Jenrick of pro-Palestine “hate marches”, as well as concerns raised by Matt Goodwin about Muslim integration. This comes just a week after Policy Exchange reported that the National Association of Muslim Police had published papers defending Hamas and describing the term “Islamist” as Islamophobic.
The training was delivered by Abbas Najib, a former police officer who is now Chief Executive of the charity Better Communities Bradford. The charity has received £490,000 from the National Lottery Community Fund since 2019, including a £35,000 grant to roll out Project Unity.
Other sessions offered by the programme include “media and political narratives” and “myths and misconceptions about Islam”.
Mr Najib has defended the programme, saying Project Unity exists to “reduce anti-Muslim hostility and strengthen trust between communities”. He said the workshops examine how public language can fuel prejudice and ask participants to consider how the same words would be received if directed at Jewish, black or other minority communities.
This is ridiculous.
It is entirely legitimate for our political leaders to raise concerns about national security and integration. They are elected to debate precisely these issues. We should be deeply alarmed that police officers and civil servants working on our country’s counter-extremism programme are being subjected to this kind of training.
At a time when public confidence in policing has been damaged by concerns about the misapplication of the law and two-tier policing, this will only make matters worse.
Earlier this year, Stephen Gray — a former police officer of 27 years — was arrested, charged and fined for a communications offence after sharing a joke about Islam on Facebook.
Enough is enough.
Parliament abolished the offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel in 2008. The Government, police and courts must stop trying to revive blasphemy laws through the back door for Islam alone.
Read more below 👇
Owen Gibbs retweeted
can’t stress enough that “we need to castrate males before puberty ruins their bodies” was a very common belief held and practice done by pederasts throughout history
🐽
Jenny Riddell-Carpenter has no problem with the bars, champagne and black Thoroughbred horses at Ascot though.
The privately-educated Jenny has been the Labour MP for Suffolk Coastal since 2024 and is currently the Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Nature.
The genteel Jenny has courted controversy in recent days by claiming that certain aspects of British life such as pubs, beer and labradors are a ‘“far right fantasy.”’
There is nothing fantastical however about the donations and perks that Jenny has accepted to help her rise to the top of the political greasy pole:
£5,000 from dodgy Labour benefactor Kevin Craig.
£16,500 over two payments from corporate communications executive and CEO of Lansons Anthony Trevor Langham (Tony Langham).
£3,500 from the @CAupdates (Countryside Alliance).
£16,500 over two payments from corporate communications entrepreneur and co-founder of Lansons Susan Clare Parsons.
£390 in tickets & hospitality from her benefactor Tony Langham for the @Ascot races. 🐎 🥂 🎩 👗
£12,000 over two payments from British intellectual property attorney Jerome Justin Watts.
£450 in tickets & hospitality from Lloyds Banking Group for the Tour of Britain cycle race.🚴🏻♂️
With her basic salary of £98,599, ministerial increments, expenses, housing allowances, her husband’s lobbying services with Appleby Solutions Ltd, generous donations and all the perks that come with the job, there’s no doubt that Jenny is doing very well for herself in the fantasy world of Westminster.
@Jenny4SuffCoast @UKLabour #LabourConference2026
Owen Gibbs retweeted
Adjoa Andoh called the Royal Family’s balcony “terribly white”.
Today, she accepted an MBE from Prince William. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.
Imagine the outrage if the description had been “terribly Black” and directed at a Black gathering.
Owen Gibbs retweeted
He blocked me for posting this photo