
Corrections of anything and anyone, given enough time and resources. ππ #BombedByWords #MockFalseGods https://nitter.cf/t.co/GLSGxZZC64 UBI, MFA, CFR: Flock!
Connecticut, USA
Joined January 2011
- Tweets14.9K
- Following1.1K
- Followers300
- Likes6.6K
Gabe Fernandez ππ©οΈπ retweeted
Love animals, don't eat them. #GoVegan
.@grok can we get a sample here of Giorgio by Moroder cut up with ad lib lyrics telling a story of a parallel struggling bohemian scholar George who finally got a βthought synthesizer to clickβ? π€£π€£π€£
Hypothetically, if bot traffic on engines were taxed more then there would be reduced burden on content creators in terms of attrition of that due to ignorance (of cost, of upstream tribute), because if they arenβt driving ad revenue they should pay πͺ (coin)
The ripple effect:
1οΈβ£ Corporate AI costs go up (fee for service)
2οΈβ£ Open-source/local AI adoption surges (cheap training wins)
3οΈβ£ LLMs are forced to integrate pass-through ads to survive
β‘οΈ synergy πΊπ€π
Gill demonstrates power-motivated self-delusion with the following pwn.
βWhen I look at an American flag, I swell up with great pride for this country. Now when James Talarico looks at the American flag, he believes it is a βcomplicated symbol.β Those are not the words of someone who loves this country.β
As if he's never encountered situations in his life where his feelings for close ones were both explicitly loving and at the same time complicated at any deeper level of pocketed resentment.
Gill says in the following that Talarico's color of skin is different than the Whites (implying not really pale at all), and what was not said was something to the effect of, that since they know how pretty their skin is and that since so much of the primate AMOG is sexual, completely resting on the bugthug grip on reality which is that the real type of dominant charisma is a consequence of acumen with knowing when to watch what's in the shadows and when to actively listen to the opposite, that is expertise with both emotional IQ and IQ.
β[These] are the Democrats that would rather condescendingly lecture you about the color of your skin than promote policies that make your life better.β
In raising the issue of condescension, Gill triggers the collectivist pseudovalue that it's okay to be harangued as long as it's someone who daddy approves of.
Link in the commentsπ
The reason that bigot, Ken Paxton, is avoiding the debate stage is because he knows how it would go, hence the only-imaginable backwards routes of shadow-strike-warlockery from their holler.
Those bold enough to be openly racist are outnumbered 2:1--who needs antisocial, uncivility--absolutely no one. These people are in the minority, but in times of social demand they will always be the most assertive on your many upper-four dimensionally entangled spaces of our (Octonionic-)imaginary point-space with one material 3-blade and many more associated and linked 3-blades, with twelve more entirely non-material 3-blades, which we are definitely existing as.
Ignorance, willful or otherwise, is a burden on those closest to you.
Take refuge under the boughs of the God of Truth, and do not get drawn into the desert by shadowy gods.
Link in the comments ππ
To be ruled by the words of a secret order is to be dominated by evil, while being ruled by the words of those seeking truth, those who donβt mind collectivist stigma by standing on the shoulders of intellectual giants, and now also on piles of chipsπ€, is the only way to enjoy the redoundment of manβs gambit of verbiage which is social compact, that we shall be taken on our words and deeds and not by willful ignorance or its belligerence, b/c Zvei Seelen, Ein Gedanke, or great minds think alike, is socially for children. ZSEG is being just a pseudofication of something innate to all primates but taken to be an end in itselfβalways ready for the next leader of innovation to pledge in word and entangle in headless assertion to call the intellectually inclined the antisocial one of the hatemates as the raison de etre in division of labor tradeoffs. π
Democratic entryists at work. Why do thisβpurely irrational!
I had given to actblue before but not since one of the texts from their crony sms machines actually said, βWe know how to win, we just need the money!β
This is entryism because anyone respecting those seeking truth would never say these things.
theonion.com/mary-peltola-inβ¦
Forsooth, carbon sequestration is the narrow path of drawing down our collective guilty emissions, and it will fail if we use it to subsidize obsolete systems (which is obstinately irrational π ). At the same time, we must end the false economy of animal exploitation. Subsidizing animal agriculture creates a pseudovalue that trades planetary stability for short-term commodity production. A serious climate strategy requires both: capturing the carbon already in our atmosphere via biological sequestration, along with dismantling the pseudoficized antagonistic occupation of imposition of bloody fare.
Okay, the fallacy of espousing ideology at all (all of it is vulnerable to pseudofication in so far as it is one-upmanship, due to our primate drive around the grapevine). Here's a very interesting accessible read on social psychology at its finest, imho. D. Pinsof's essay on why Every Argument (campaign) is Bullshit, and shared this 23 page essay on primate behavior in the human world. Note, regarding collection of the rational and the irrational: it's the paper which holds the truths, and the unique handle that provides the symbolic serialization (how could a physical UUID by rational? Impossible.): #GodOfAllTruths el emet, know-it-all NOT know-ass #MockFalseGods
Replying to @DavidPinsof
π§ππ€π€β¨
Replying to @TheDailyShow
If you draw the line from POTUS to SH and also the line from WH to CF then you see that the transformation was from US exec officer (also π¦πΎπ) to *executed* Fascist Dictator (π·πΊπ«) you can see the parallel shade going from π¦πΎπ β‘οΈ π¨βπ³πποΈ βΌοΈ
The man-reading-man usage of the eyes is one thing, while the text-reading usage of the eyes is an entirely different usage which employs abstraction. So, while the eyes can be used to observe more than body language in any dialog, in more dimensions of our multi-faceted selves than are perhaps attended to by serial-language communicators (well-read people) with any regularity, such as for the purpose of watching for where the man speaking is going to breach a grudge or other externality of the genuine serial language delivery, a social person will leave one mode for those seeking small talk and real communication for those not looking for chit chat.
This class mismatch exacerbates the view of the knowledge worker to believe the other is nothing better than a half-wit, due to the fact that the other's wits have been split between facet monitoring and serial language abstraction processing, with each suffering to perform fully at either function, either as being an intelligent respondent or as being an empathetic soul.
Give some men a wonderful book and they'll not open it or consider it further than where it came from. These types will upon stowing it even foresee a time when they would use it for purposes of kindling.
Perhaps with the replacement of manual labor by robots, these class disparities will disappear, as the collectivist is surrounded by individuals demanding they do their share of the textual labor of literacy. Perhaps this is the most tightly held motivation of the digital Luddite. #MockFalseGods
Gabe Fernandez ππ©οΈπ retweeted
Hello @elonmusk, Hitler historian here, having researched & written about Hitler for 22 yrs & being a fellow of the Hoover Institution - not exactly a hotbed of far left ideas. This doesnβt add up. It is predicated on the false assumption that collectivism only exists on the Left







