J Morrison

Everyone's favorite far right extremist nails it again.

The End of Woke (And the Man Who Killed It) They almost had it. They were so close. It began with the gay marriage debate in 2012. Barack Obama was reelected president partially as a result of his stance on the issue, despite opposing same-sex marriage in years past. Most of rational society were caught off guard by the argument- not that we were opposed to the notion of two same-sex people entering into a marital contract together, but that there was even an argument against it in the first place. It seemed everyone outside of a small handful of die hard conservatives and religious zealots were in unanimous agreement on the subject, and that agreement was represented by a resounding half-hearted shrug. It wasn’t that we didn’t care about the legality of genuine love, it was that most of us felt our society had progressed far beyond same-sex relationships being taboo. It was hard to believe gay marriage was still being questioned in some parts of the west. But if you were even peripherally paying attention to mainstream media during that election cycle, you would’ve thought there were armies of bigots marching on every major town center demanding gay marriage be permanently outlawed. The media created an air of tension between political blocs and manufactured an opposition that hitherto didn’t exist. It was a strange phenomenon to witness as moderate conservatives took up the mantle for their evangelistic brethren in reaction to liberal accusations of hate. Mainstream media was successful in casting an adversary out of a group who were previously apathetic to the matter. I heard warnings from conservative friends that this was a mousetrap; that we were being baited into something dangerous. I, who at the time was a slowly maturing centrist emerging from a left wing cocoon, felt they were falling for a trap of a different kind themselves- even as I was shedding the last bits of my naively progressive shell. I sensed they were resorting to the same tribalism that captured so many other conservatives and aroused a hostility to same-sex marriage that was purposely generated by our media to fabricate a genuine wedge issue. I was dead wrong. Gay marriage was the furnace in which the hammer and sickle of woke neomarxism were forged. It was the first inch in many miles; an innocuous step forward that was required as a matter of compassion and modernity, yet was used as a doorstop to introduce a number of other concepts and lifestyles that would increase in absurdity as western society was being conditioned to accept the one before it. Third wave feminism entered the public consciousness on the heels of same-sex marriage and Black Lives Matter followed. Slogans like “me too” and “time’s up” became commonplace, and the name “black lives matter” inferred a sentiment most unprejudiced people would agree with. These were signals of a society progressing beyond misogyny and discrimination, however, these seemingly insipid civil rights statements were a cover for an insidious ideology that lied behind them. Third wave feminism was a mutated version of the first and second waves that preceded it; a postmodern interpretation of women’s rights that placed women firmly on the intersectional oppression grid as eternal victims of patriarchal torment. Black Lives Matter was borne out of Critical Race Theory; another branch of postmodern intersectionality that placed Black Americans squarely in the crosshairs of an all-encompassing systemic racism, which was a symptom of a white supremacist conspiracy that served a singular function: extermination of black people and culture in all forms. On the surface it appeared these two liberation campaigns were traveling along differing lanes, but in reality they were dual tentacles of a neomarxist parasite slowly wrapping itself around the western mind. In Canada, once the public had been adequately pickled in self-satisfying platitudes, we elected a prime minister who is the living embodiment of empty rhetoric and superficial gestures of morality. From his first day in office we were declared a post-national state; a country in name only that had devolved into an unidentifiable colony trying to reconcile itself against a set of dogmatic axioms that were anathema to even the most simple aspects of human nature. Marxism as an economic and cultural theory was designed with deception as a requirement for successful application since anyone who understood the mechanisms involved would reject it immediately, therefore, in this twenty first century adaptation postmodernism was added with the specific intent to further dilute any meaning that could be derived from it- in the event anyone was able to correctly recognize what they were observing. The outcome was a constant atmosphere of chaos and confusion. Canadian society was thrown into a tailspin as questions concerning race and identity consumed public discourse. Transgenderism arrived on the back of Black Lives Matter and further muddied waters that were already clouded with sediment. Transgenderism itself was an outgrowth of queer theory; yet another checkpoint on the intersectional oppression grid and tentacle belonging to the same neomarxist parasite. White liberal guilt proved to be an eager host for the postmodern tick, and the gullibility of the metropolitan class allowed it to grow and flourish. Liberals performed daily routines of mental gymnastics to appease their perceived victims and atoned for their sins through repeated oaths to equity. Meanwhile, billions of tax dollars were disappearing from our treasury and an elitist oligarchy was forming. It was during the Covid-19 pandemic that the authoritarian behemoth which had been lurking directly beneath us finally surfaced from those murky waters. By then we were so conditioned to being flogged for the act of living, we were prepared to sacrifice ourselves as the monster’s jaws clamped down around our necks. Inch by inch our freedoms were stripped away, but with every arrow laid down on a grocery store floor, and every experimental vaccine we were forced to accept, something began to ignite in the Canadian people. A wick had been lit that traveled from person to person; through communities, towns, provinces; right across the entire country. Tens of thousands descended on Ottawa in protest. Our Prime Minister- the champion purveyor of thoughts and prayers- hid while his country rediscovered its national identity and demanded an end to his nonsensical edicts. For three weeks Canada came alive and swung mightily from our corner, and in a desperate show of cowardice, our Prime Minister and his deputies invoked the Emergencies Act- a last resort wartime measure- to institute martial law and end the awakening. February 14, 2022: the day woke died. The Liberal government froze bank accounts and seized assets belonging to protestors. The dramatic authoritarian overreach sent shockwaves around the developed world. Our American neighbors recoiled in horror at what Canada had become. Members of the European parliament condemned our government for their fascist behavior. Banks scrambled to explain how they conceded to such an egregious abuse of power. Multinational corporations canceled contracts with Canadian businesses for fear of prospective government interference. In one fell swoop Justin Trudeau revealed where this neomarxist exercise would lead. The World Economic Forum’s great reset crumbled as a consequence of their affiliation with their young global leader. The sprint toward global totalitarianism didn’t end in that moment- in fact, it sped up. But that single action caused anyone within earshot to sit up and pay attention. Overnight the great reset transformed from conspiracy theory to widely acknowledged reality and the political poles began to shift. In Holland farmers launched their own protest inspired by the Canadian truckers and eventually toppled their WEF infected government. Argentina recently elected Javier Milei, a staunch libertarian and anti-marxist, as their new president. Thousands have taken to the streets in Spain to protest their illegitimate socialist government, and change seems to be on the horizon. In North America the cultural tectonic plates are grinding furiously. Donald Trump is the clear runaway favorite in America’s next presidential race, with the closest runner-up being Robert F. Kennedy Jr.- another political outsider and anti-mRNA vaccine advocate. Third wave feminism was swallowed by transgenderism and pulverized by a series of humiliating takedowns from second wave feminists. Black Lives Matter lost all credibility when we learned much of the donor funding had been laundered into accounts and properties belonging to prominent members. The transgender discussion continues, but is dying after parents- particularly Muslim parents- fought back against attempts to indoctrinate children into their cult of self-hate and mutilation, triggering conservative politicians to put forth legislation that protects children from being targeted by this group. Justin Trudeau’s reputation never recovered. At home he’s a pariah who can’t make public appearances without being swarmed by protestors on both sides of the political divide, and internationally he’s despised by leaders of all stripes, from all corners of the planet. The latest polls show a massive exodus of voters from traditionally Liberal ridings moving toward Conservative leader, Pierre Poilievre. Canada isn’t due for a federal election until 2025, but most insiders can't imagine Trudeau’s political career surviving beyond the spring of 2024. The WEF’s quest for global dominance isn’t over and is evident in Europe’s plan to introduce a digital ID in the coming year- but what has changed is the awareness of their agenda. Every country with ties to the UN, WHO and WEF has their own developing story of resistance- whether it’s “blade runners” in the UK dismantling ULEZ cameras or members in Australian parliament holding Pfizer accountable for their unfolding mRNA vaccine catastrophe. Climate change was supposed to be the proceeding crisis that closed the doors and led us into the slaughter, but this new awareness has significantly weakened what was set up to be the knockout blow to freedom. Compliance is key to control, and if the people won’t comply then they cannot be controlled. Deception was their strongest tactic, and now that tactic is dead. Since awareness exists, brute force is their only option, and there aren’t enough foot soldiers on earth to muscle the masses. If the people want to be free, then free we will be. As long as we hold that principle above all else, they cannot take it from us- unless we allow it.

Malignant narcissism is the one common characteristic that runs through all tyrants, past and present. In my reading lately, I've been revisiting Mao Tse Tung and the Cultural Revolution in China, since I believe the Cultural Revolution most closely resembles what's happening right now in the west and modern day China is the model for the great reset we've been thrusted toward. One aspect I've found particularly striking is the Red Guard: a de facto army of student activists that began in Peking and spread across the entire country. In August 1966, a series of riots and violent uprisings broke out in China- spurred along by Mao himself. The Red Guard was tasked with purging the country of all culture from pre-Maoist Chinese civilization. The idea was to destroy any connection China had to its cultural past and to reshape it completely in Mao's vision. Teachers, writers, artists, etc, were arrested, tortured and murdered, homes and institutions were raided, cultural artifacts like paintings, books, records and musical instruments were destroyed, and ancient monuments were leveled. The parallels with the west today are obvious. During the student protests of the last five or so years teachers weren't murdered (although in some circumstances they came close, just ask @bretweinstein), but the sentiment was the same: to purge the old and introduce a new cultural line of thought. Transgenderism is just a component of this ideological shift, but is a clear example. The idea is to medicalize the body (turning children into permanent customers of big pharma for the rest of their natural lives) and institutionalize the mind (creating citizens totally obedient to authoritarian dictates). Technology has made it so today's Red Guard doesn't have to raid homes for cultural artifacts- they can just censor the internet. They don't have to burn books- they can just stop printing them and make easily edited digital versions available. They don't have to kill anyone- they can just cancel you and destroy your ability to make a living (see: @rustyrockets) or take your bank account (see: @nigel_farage). The personality cult that existed around Mao is the same one that exists around Trudeau; everything is tailored to appease a fragile yet sociopathic ego. But the difference is Mao was the lone psychopath in charge- Trudeau just thinks he is. In our modern day the real despots are the ones pulling the strings on Trudeau, Biden, Sunak and others. It seems there's an additional layer of malignant narcissism that has yet to be understood.

Follow up: The biggest argument I hear in favor of the trans agenda is this: "Governments and schools are just creating safe spaces for trans kids." Bullshit. If governments and schools cared about children at all- let alone trans kids- we wouldn't have millions of them living in abject poverty, many going through life without knowing how to read. We'd be handing them books instead of screens. We would be encouraging great ideas instead of preparing them for crushing mediocrity or letting them languish in poverty. We would invest even a tiny fraction of what we're sending to Ukraine into education. Virtually every totalitarian regime of the 20th century specifically targeted children and deliberately severed them from their parents. Under Stalin children were employed as spies and were made to believe their parents were potential enemies. Under Hitler children were brainwashed and trained to be bloodthirsty Aryan soldiers. Children were made to murder their own parents under the Khmer Rouge. It's not about safe spaces. It's about creating an unstoppable ideological army and a generation of slaves. And the only way to do it is to remove parents from the equation. There's your reason.

It's not transphobia. It's not hate. Imagine you drop your child off at school one morning and a giant crucifix has been erected in front of the main entrance. You're not a Christian and this isn't a Christian school so it seems out of place. When you ask the principal about the crucifix they tell you it's merely a gesture to express solidarity with Christian students and create an inclusive atmosphere. Then the entire month of December is devoted to recognizing and incorporating Christian dogma into regular lessons. The celebration of Christianity is extended to include January. You notice your child's science class is teaching creationism instead of evolution. The school library now includes books that veer into the more extreme aspects of evangelistic Christianity- complete with graphic drawings depicting horrific acts during The Crusades. The drawings and texts not only approve of, but encourage this violent behavior. Your child begins secretly reading this material and becomes distant. They don't talk to you about their personal life. There seems to be a disconnect. You find out the school baptized your child without your knowledge, and has encouraged your child to keep their baptism a secret because you are not a Christian and you won't approve of their religious conversion. The school has even gone so far as to convince your child that you're an enemy because you are not allied with their new Christian identity. They have a new group of friends, new habits, new characteristics that don't seem natural, but your child won't talk to you about it because you're an outsider. You confront the school about this and the moment you do you're labeled a bigot and a fascist. You're told to affirm your child's new Christian identity, and if you don't there's a strong chance they'll commit suicide. What would you do if you were in this scenario? Is this hate? Is this concerned parent Christphopic? And this isn't even a good analogy because Christianity doesn't permanently mutilate and disfigure children as a baseline requirement for entry- nor would it ever try to. This isn't hate. This is love being turned against you.