Each time Alberta has established an Electoral Boundaries Commission to redraw election maps the government has accepted the commission’s majority report, so I was surprised and disappointed to learn that a committee of MLAs has instead been tasked with creating a new map. /1

Apr 16, 2026 · 9:51 PM UTC

40
489
60
1,076
98,083
RelevantRecentLikes
As a member of Alberta’s Electoral Boundaries Commission, I wanted to share some background on why we give independent commissions the job of creating election maps and also provide some details on what’s in the majority report. /2
3
62
1
305
8,207
In Canada, we don’t want elected officials drawing their own election maps. Instead, governments give independent commissions the job of drawing maps that reflect population trends while also respecting the challenges of representing diverse, rural and remote communities. /3
4
145
2
511
10,836
The Canadian model isn’t one-person-one-vote, it’s what we call “effective representation.” /4
6
43
228
6,121
Commissions are non-partisan. We travelled to every corner of the province gathering input from Albertans of all political stripes, holding nearly 50 public hearings in 16 locations across the province. Including written submissions, we heard from over 2,000 people. /5
6
55
1
270
6,532
In the end, the majority of the commission (two members appointed by the opposition and the judge appointed by the government) created recommended maps. /6
1
36
223
5,676
Our majority report balances the dramatic shift in population to urban Alberta while respecting the genuine difficulty of representing sparsely populated areas far from the Legislature. /7
2
43
232
5,658
It was a fair process that created a balanced electoral map delivering effective representation to all Albertans. /8
1
46
1
247
5,694
The majority’s view on number of seats in the Legislature was clear; we suggested future commissions be given the power to set the number of seats in the Legislature (like they do in BC), and if so “…we may very well have proposed a map of at least 91 electoral divisions.” /9
1
45
214
5,653
Or, we may not have. We would have drawn a map of 91 (or any other number) the same way we drew the map of 89; we would start with a blank map and independently consider how we could provide effective representation for all Albertans. /10
1
42
213
5,258
What we can’t do is simply drop two new seats onto an existing map. The commission goes where the data takes us, and context matters when we're creating a map based on effective representation for all. /11
1
52
248
5,862
It’s also important to know that the recommendation that a committee of MLAs implement a map of 91 seats came from only one member of the five-member commission. /12
1
67
3
268
6,720
I will end with what I think are the most important words in the 362-page Electoral Boundaries Report: /13
1
32
1
186
7,570
“…the Legislative Assembly should carefully consider the majority of this Commission’s independent, justified, and reasonable recommendations before adopting any alternative boundaries...the majority recommends the adoption of the majority report in its totality.” /14
3
83
331
7,318
Thanks for reading this far...you can read the full report here: elections.ab.ca/uploads/abeb…
12
72
3
286
6,406
Serious question Greg... Given population growth in southwest Edmonton (a toss-up UCP vs NDP area) and in south Calgary (a heavily UCP area)... How did you manage to draw a map where both new seats would be NDP, and an existing UCP seat flips to the NDP?
15
8
2
71
3,882
Surprised? C’mon. Disappointed. I am pissed off!!!
1
3
51
1,556
No MLA, or person associated with any political party should be involved in drawing an election map. It is like putting the inmates in charge of the prison. The UCP corruption needs to be stopped.
1
4
40
689
This government desire to skew ridings to rural areas is in the political DNA. Waaaay back in the ‘90s the province’s top court ruled the ridings were so bad it “cannot be permitted to continue if Alberta wishes to continue calling itself a democracy.”
7
26
776
Greg, you’re surprised @FreeAlbertaRob @ABDanielleSmith @UCPCaucus , the most corrupt govt in Canadian History , is trying to cheat?
1
2
19
1,055
Those concerned should write to their MLA and the premier! [email protected]
3
15
707
I wasn’t. Dani knows she is getting more unpopular by the minute. She is ,‘making sure that we have free and fair elections ‚‘ by attempting to rig it in her favour. She is looking after her own interests, emulating the man she most admires, Trump.
2
6
13
692
Carney needs to amend the Elections Act to state that provincial electoral boundaries must mirror federal ones.
2
3
1
14
773
The UCP and Dictator Smith Need To be Held Accountable for Their ILLEGAL ACTS . That is Why they Have Electoral Boundaries Commission . Everything the UCP and That Dictator Smith have Done So Much Wrong !!! This is ALBERTA , CANADA and STILL DEMOCRACY !!!!!! KARMA IS COMING!
1
1
7
739
Thanks for the solid explainer. 🌱🌳 A few thoughts from 2022: nitter.cf/KevinTurnerCNJ/status/…
"Fair Warnings and Demonstrable Failures" & "A Time to Listen Well" "Ms. Smith and her handlers (now including Mr. Harper) recognize this too. That's why they are attempting to finish the job while they still can." Now is the Time. #ableg #abpoli facebook.com/story.php?story…
2
7
755
Ya that’s great, Greg, but as a future UCP advisor I’m gunna have to disregard. Thanks
5
674
@FreeAlbertaRob perhaps you'd like to direct your comments directly to a person involved in the process.
1
2
3
423
Disappointed but not surprised. This government does what it wants regardless of precedent .
4
528
Unfortunately the UCP know what is best for Albertans and they will make all decisions
3
995
Thanks for your comments! Was there backlash following the interim report? Why did the minority pivot following the release of the interim report? Would you say the diagreement stems from the best solution that addresses loss of rural representation?
1
2
1,323
I commend your good work. But, why would you be surprised? The UCPs are the mini-me of the corrupt Trump administration. Never expect above-board democracy with this gang.
1
3
307