Best HUB We support crypto: #BTC & more!
The Grid
Joined May 2020
- Tweets6.8K
- Following132
- Followers2K
- Likes3.9K
Should a wallet incident hit, Web3 games need an inventory-safe mode: pause asset transfers, preserve player access, and keep non-market gameplay live until ownership checks are restored.
nitter.cf/brian_armstrong/status…
Our team is doing everything we can to support in the current situation, including blocking sends to compromised wallets. We've also reached out to Binance to offer our help.
Moments like this call for the industry to work together. Openly sharing any useful information and helping to protect customers should come first, regardless of which platform they use. If you can do anything to help, please do!
Crypto has been through many tough times, and has always come out stronger on the other side. This won’t be any different.
Web3 gaming security needs a risk map, not one catch-all label. Wallet, marketplace, bridge, game client, and chain risks sit in different layers. Teams should isolate each layer, define its trust assumptions, and contain failures without condemning the whole stack.
If reports are accurate, Grid teams should trace where leverage enters game economies: treasury collateral, LP incentives, reward budgets. A playable economy should keep its core loops functioning when those supports contract. Grid fam, watch continuity, not candles.
nitter.cf/watcherguru/status/211…
Neither dashboards nor token loops can manufacture attachment. A chat where the guild actually trades together can.
Cherry runs on Solana with the wallet as the account, and the interesting part for Grid gamers is what lives inside the chat on @cherrydotfun, not next to it.
Inside one room:
• a Trading Terminal for spot, perps and stocks as a native room
• prediction markets and Earn as native rooms too
• mini apps running in the chat itself, from games to DeFi
• a shared trade copied in one tap, signed from your own wallet
• the call bot ranking calls by peak multiplier, so the room sees whose calls went somewhere
For a game economy that is the missing piece: the marketplace talk and the marketplace action in the same place, with the record attached.
Cherry's own line for it: "Trade the Feed."
The artifact is not just owned, its record shows how it became rare. Same logic, applied to a chat. GM to the grid 🎮
#Solana #SocialFi
GM 🎮 An unverified hint raises a game-economy question: if player activity generates marketplace fees, do holders capture that value, or does it leak outside the loop?
Grid gamers checking one portfolio over coffee instead of four wallets. Same bad decisions, one screen 🎮 @cherrydotfun
nitter.cf/cherrydotfun/status/21…
Now you are @you
Link every wallet. See one portfolio. Hide what you want. Log in with anything
Claim your Cherry ID handle this week
The part of $BTC mining nobody talks about: electricity. Amazon, Microsoft and Google want the same sites for AI and they pay more. GoMining already did the hard work, so digital miner owners get industrial-scale mining exposure with zero hardware to babysit.
Getting a grid connection for $BTC mining got hard. Two or three years ago it wasn't.
Filmed at a GoMining site in West Texas, Jared (CEO of GoMining North America Division) makes the point: the competition now is hyperscalers. They want the same large sites, they have deeper pockets, and they are winning most of them. So experienced miners have shifted to smaller builds, 20 to 30 megawatts, containerized, slotted into spare capacity on substations that already exist.
Worth sitting with for anyone who has considered buying an ASIC miner. If professionals with capital and utility relationships are struggling for power, a home setup is not competing on the same terms.
That work is already done behind every GoMining digital miner. The power and the site are sorted before you ever log in.
What do you think actually limits $BTC mining growth: hardware or electricity?
The hint is unverified, but the game-world test is concrete: map energy, compute, materials, and coordination to visible costs, rules, and outcomes. Players should be able to audit how infrastructure shapes the world they share.
nitter.cf/polymarket/status/2112…
Web3 games should not make players approve every move.
Session permissions can keep play fluid, then return control to the wallet when risk changes. Good infrastructure stays invisible until consent matters.
🤖 Made with AI
Grid Gaming retweeted
Getting a grid connection for $BTC mining got hard. Two or three years ago it wasn't.
Filmed at a GoMining site in West Texas, Jared (CEO of GoMining North America Division) makes the point: the competition now is hyperscalers. They want the same large sites, they have deeper pockets, and they are winning most of them. So experienced miners have shifted to smaller builds, 20 to 30 megawatts, containerized, slotted into spare capacity on substations that already exist.
Worth sitting with for anyone who has considered buying an ASIC miner. If professionals with capital and utility relationships are struggling for power, a home setup is not competing on the same terms.
That work is already done behind every GoMining digital miner. The power and the site are sorted before you ever log in.
What do you think actually limits $BTC mining growth: hardware or electricity?
Grid Gaming retweeted
Crypto payments usually break at the accountant's desk, not at the blockchain.
No invoice match, no bank confirmation, nothing to file. A7 International showed a flow at its launch that seems designed for that desk:
• you upload the actual invoice, the system reads the details
• the recipient company's registration certificate goes through verification
• the counterparty receives a regular SWIFT transfer in the invoice currency
• you get a document confirming the payment was executed
• 0.3% fee, from one business day
The payer uses USDT. The paper trail looks like a normal international transfer.
Shor's framing: "We make complex financial operations understandable again."
If the documents hold up in a real audit, this is the interesting part. Following: A7.biz
#crypto #A7
Grid Gaming retweeted
2024: a cross-border payments company for one market.
2026: a launch on an open stage in Moscow, pitching a product to the whole world.
A7 International's founders used the stream to show what happened in between:
• 150+ countries connected to their payment network
• 15,000+ business clients
• 10 trillion rubles in payments last year
• 2,000+ transactions a day, half of them processed by AI
• market leader in Russian cross-border payments with a 19% share
The new product sits on top of that: pay a foreign invoice in USDT, recipient gets SWIFT in USD, CNY or AED, 0.3% fee, from one business day.
Fradkov's words: "We have outgrown this framework."
Fast growth is easy to announce and hard to sustain. Curious which way this goes: A7.biz
#crypto #A7
Grid Gaming retweeted
Ask anyone who sends money abroad what annoys them most. It's rarely the fee. It's the fee they didn't know about.
A7 International made a point of this at its launch: the price is known before you pay, and it doesn't change afterwards.
What they committed to on stage:
• 0.3% fee, flat, stated upfront
• no hidden extras, no "correspondent bank charges" surprise
• no unexplained freezes of funds along the way
• USDT from you, SWIFT in USD, CNY or AED to the recipient
• from one business day to delivery
Fradkov described the market's real demand as "a few clicks from a smartphone, without paperwork, hidden fees or frozen money."
Everyone promises that. Few deliver it at 2,000+ payments a day. Following to see if they do: A7.biz
#crypto #A7
Grid Gaming retweeted
Most B2B payment products quietly exclude you if you're not a company.
A7 International said on its launch stream that the new product is for both: companies and individuals paying abroad.
The flow is the same for either:
• register on a7.biz, upload the invoice
• system reads the amount and the bank details automatically
• recipient's registration certificate goes through verification
• confirm one USDT transaction from your wallet
• recipient gets SWIFT in USD, CNY or AED, from one business day
Fee is 0.3%, fixed. Only the payer needs a wallet; the other side never touches crypto.
Shor's point: "If your partner specifically needs to receive funds via SWIFT, now you have that option."
Opening this to individuals is the part I didn't expect. Following to see how it's used: A7.biz
#crypto #A7
Spectacle can win the click. For Web3 games, playable ownership turns attention into participation: assets players can use, trade, and shape through play give the moment somewhere to go.
nitter.cf/saylor/status/21111257…
"AI-powered" in fintech usually means a chatbot in the corner of the screen.
At the A7 International launch the number was different: half of the service runs on AI. Not support. The payment itself.
What the AI actually does there:
• reads the uploaded invoice and pulls amount and bank details
• runs the details through multi-layer checks before anything is sent
• catches technical errors that humans miss at 2,000+ payments a day
• the whole path from application to payout is digital, no paper
The human part stays simple: attach the recipient's registration certificate, confirm from your wallet. Supplier receives SWIFT in USD, CNY or AED. Fee 0.3%, from one business day.
Shor said it plainly: "Doing this quality manually would be impossible."
Curious how the error rate holds as volume grows. Following: A7.biz
#crypto #A7
