TRAs are trying to reduce women to a subset of our sex class by forcing people to use the prefix "cis". This implies that there are other types of women.
Women don't need a prefix in the English language, as the primary category requires no modification. Imposing "cis" acts as an unnecessary retronym; it is illogical because every woman is a woman already.
No one asks for "caffeinated coffee", "non-sparkling water", "cow's milk", or "alcoholic beer" when the context already makes the default clear. The qualifier is only needed to specify a non-default variant.
Read the full piece below to explore how TRAs are trying to change the English language. We must resist.
The term "biological woman" only got coined because trans people were claiming to have literally changed sex or even to have always been their "desired sex" from birth, but current medical technology was unable to detect it.
That is precisely why the term exists whether you like it or not.
It’s there to differentiate actual woman from men who claim to be women.
Hey it’s not me that’s claiming to be the opposite sex. Maybe concentrate your efforts on fully grown men claiming to be females.
What am i ignorant of?
That some people we understand to be male are somehow actually female?
Here’s your chance to explain to me why I’m ignorant! The floor is yours.
Oh, it's my chance? Holy shit I really have a chance? To explain something to you?
Fuck, what an incredible opportunity!
Sure, whatever you say.
Not because you're full of shit like I said earlier, it's totally the thing that you say it is.
"So you XYZ..."
Like fucking clockwork. Like a German train.
Sep 2, 2026 · 2:42 PM UTC