Here to look, learn & comment. NO to violence & oppression. NO to One World Govt. ❤️animals. I ignore DMs. #RestoreBritain
Joined May 2018
- Tweets20K
- Following2K
- Followers2.1K
- Likes1K
Helen Knight retweeted
🚨🚨HARSH BLOW TO THE EU of Von der Leyen💥
The Dutch lawyer Meike Terhorst has demolished the EU's illegal plans for mass control 🔥
«The EU IS NOT a sovereign State, CANNOT impose ANYTHING on member countries!»
The tyranny of DIGITAL IDENTITY? We can toss it in the trash!
BRAVO 👏🔥A GREAT EXAMPLE this is the treatment we must give to Von der Leyen's totalitarianism 🔥
Helen Knight retweeted
This apology from disability charity Scope, for cancelling my choir’s London Marathon performance because of my gender-critical views, is required to stay on its website for seven days.
Today is Day 6.
Women don’t always get the apologies they deserve. So I’d be grateful if you could help make sure this one is seen by sharing it over the next 24 hours (link below). 🙏
Thanks again to @SpeechUnion for supporting my legal case and helping secure this apology.
Helen Knight retweeted
Il est 20h. Les enfants sont couchés.
Vous êtes tranquillement devant la télé avec votre femme.
Soudain, des cris éclatent dans la rue. Des coups, des vitres qui explosent. Des dizaines d’émeutiers vêtus de noir s’en prennent à votre immeuble. Ils tentent de forcer la porte, saccagent le hall, arrachent les boîtes aux lettres.
Vos enfants se réveillent en hurlant. Votre femme panique.
Vous appelez la police.
« Tous nos agents sont occupés, veuillez patienter. »
Puis la communication coupe.
Vous jetez un œil par la fenêtre. En bas, ils viennent de mettre le feu aux poubelles. Les flammes lèchent déjà la façade. La fumée commence à entrer dans l’appartement.
Soudain, un grand fracas.
La porte de l’immeuble vient de céder.
Des hurlements montent dans l’escalier.
« On va vous tuer ! Ouvrez cette putain de porte ! »
Ils sont sur votre palier.
Vous n’osez même pas regarder par l’œil de bœuf.
Que faire ?
Sortir ? Fuir ? Impossible. Ils sont dans l’escalier.
Sauter par la fenêtre ? Vous êtes au quatrième étage.
Se défendre ? Avec quoi ?
Vous n’avez jamais pensé avoir besoin de vous défendre chez vous. Vous avez toujours fait confiance à l’État. Les armes, ce n’est pas votre truc.
Vous avez travaillé toute votre vie, payé vos impôts, respecté les lois.
Et maintenant, vous voilà coincé dans votre propre appartement, avec vos enfants en pleurs et votre femme qui vous demande ce qu’on va faire.
Derrière la porte, les pas se rapprochent.
Cette fois, ce n’est pas une vidéo d’émeutes que vous regardez à la télévision. C’est chez vous que ça se passe.
Et personne ne viendra vous protéger.
Helen Knight retweeted
I went to witness the riots in Paris.
I’m going to tell you the truth: it was only young people from African immigrant backgrounds who came to attack our police officers and firefighters, loot our shops, and destroy everything.
An elderly French couple in their 80s was robbed and left in their underwear in the street.
The steeple of a 150-year-old church was completely burned down.
This is not a social revolt for better education.
It’s a taste of an ethnic war that took place today.
Helen Knight retweeted
Je veux parler au monde entier de ce qui se passe en France. S’il vous plaît, écoutez-moi.
Ils ont dit « importez le tiers-monde, devenez le tiers-monde ». Ils avaient tort. C’est pire que ça.
Aujourd’hui, la France brûle.
Des monuments historiques s’effondrent dans les flammes sous les regards, les cris et parfois les applaudissements de brutes.
À Limoges, ce 17 octobre 2026, l’hôtel de ville — ce magnifique édifice du XIXe siècle, inauguré en 1883, conçu dans un style néo-Renaissance, classé monument historique, qui avait traversé les deux guerres mondiales sans être détruit — a été pris d’assaut et incendié par des individus cagoulés.
La tour s’est effondrée. Une large partie de la toiture et de la façade a disparu. Les autorités parlent d’une « catastrophe patrimoniale » et d’un bâtiment « en grande partie perdu ».
Des siècles de pierre, de savoir-faire et de mémoire réduits en cendres en quelques heures.
« Devenir le tiers-monde » serait un euphémisme.
Le tiers-monde n’a jamais connu l’ascension que nous avons accomplie. Il n’a donc jamais rien eu à perdre de comparable.
Nous, peuples du monde civilisé, avons bâti le premier monde avec la sueur, le sang, l’ingéniosité et le sacrifice de nos ancêtres.
Ils se sont tués à la tâche, génération après génération, pour offrir un avenir digne à leurs descendants.
Chaque église, chaque mairie, chaque école, chaque pont porte encore la marque de leurs mains et de leur sang.
Aujourd’hui, les immigrationnistes crachent sur leurs tombes.
Ils importent en masse des populations issues de sociétés qui n’ont ni construit ni su préserver un ordre comparable — et qui, une fois installées, deviennent les acteurs de sa destruction.
Ce ne sont pas seulement des individus incapables de maintenir ce que nous avons élevé. Ils provoquent et applaudissent les effondrements, les pillages, les incendies.
Notre patrimoine n’est plus un héritage à transmettre, c'est devenu une cible prioritaire.
Voilà ce qui attend tout pays du monde civilisé qui ne stoppe pas net l’immigration en provenance du tiers-monde et qui ne met pas en œuvre, au plus vite, une remigration massive.
Sinon, la démographie fera le reste. Les taux de fécondité élevés dans ces communautés assurent le grand remplacement progressif.
Ce n’est pas une théorie. C’est de l’arithmétique.
Ce qui brûle aujourd’hui à Limoges brûlera demain chez vous si vous ne faites rien.
Peuples du monde civilisé — d’Europe, d’Amérique, d’Australie, du Japon, de Corée et partout où la raison, la science, le droit et la beauté ont élevé des sociétés d’exception, je vous en supplie : regardez ce qui se passe en France en ce moment.
Ne croyez pas que « ça n’arrivera pas chez nous ».
Les mêmes mécanismes sont à l’œuvre là où les frontières sont ouvertes et où les immigrationnistes sont au pouvoir.
Agissez tant qu’il en est encore temps.
Contrôlez vos frontières, exigez l’assimilation réelle ou le retour sans concession, protégez vos monuments, vos lois et vos enfants.
Ne sombrez pas dans le chaos sous les flammes et les applaudissements comme nous.
L’héritage de vos ancêtres mérite mieux que d’être livré à des brutes incendiaires.
Helen Knight retweeted
🔻They made it in a lab. They KNEW it would kill. And they released it anyway.
On **June 18, 2026** — her FINAL day as Director of National Intelligence — Tulsi Gabbard declassified **4.7 million pages.** Every email. Every wire transfer. Every internal memo they thought was buried forever.
What the media WON'T show you from those files:
**PAGE 2,847 — NIAID Internal Memo, October 3, 2019:**
"Phase 3 aerosolization test complete. Mortality projection: **1.8 to 3.2 million** within 18 months of release. Recommend immediate halt."
Fauci's handwritten response: **"Continue. Funding secured through Geneva."**
THAT WAS 3 MONTHS BEFORE THE FIRST "CASE" IN WUHAN.
The money trail — now FULLY visible:
▪️ **$47.3 million** routed through EcoHealth Alliance to Wuhan between 2014-2019
▪️ **$128 million** in "preparedness grants" sent to 3 Swiss intermediaries
▪️ **$2.1 BILLION** in Moderna pre-production contracts signed **AUGUST 2019** — 4 months BEFORE the pandemic was announced
They ordered the vaccine BEFORE the virus was public.
A classified briefing — **November 14, 2019** — attended by Fauci, Collins, and **7 members of Congress.** They were told a novel pathogen would emerge from Wuhan within 60 days.
They didn't warn you. They BOUGHT STOCK. Congressional trading records show **$312 million** in pharma positions opened between November 15 and December 20, 2019.
THEY BET ON YOUR DEATH. AND WON.
Declassified DOD mortality analysis — completed March 2024, suppressed until now:
▪️ COVID direct deaths: **1.2 million**
▪️ Vaccine adverse deaths: **487,000**
▪️ Lockdown deaths: **340,000**
▪️ TOTAL: **2.03 MILLION AMERICANS**
From a virus MANUFACTURED and RELEASED with full knowledge.
THIS IS THE LARGEST MASS MURDER IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
**WHAT COMES NEXT:**
A sealed federal grand jury — empaneled **May 22, 2026** — has reviewed these documents for 27 days. **11 indictments** ready. Fauci. Collins. 3 EcoHealth executives. 2 Moderna board members. **4 sitting members of Congress.**
Trump's response on June 19: **"No deals. No immunity. TRIBUNALS."**
You watched them lock you in your homes. Silence your doctors. Inject your children. NOW YOU KNOW WHY.
GAINOF-FUNCTION-1019
MODERNA-PRE-0819
TRIBUNAL-11-SEALED
They created the plague. They sold the cure. They buried the evidence. But the evidence just ROSE FROM THE GRAVE.
⟁
Helen Knight retweeted
Why is this not getting more support ?
petition.parliament.uk/petit…
Helen Knight retweeted
BEFORE YOU BOARD YOUR NEXT FLIGHT, READ THIS.
27 BRITISH PILOTS WERE TESTED. ALL 27 SHOWED EVIDENCE OF TOXIC EXPOSURE.
A former commercial airline captain named John Hoyte @JohnHoytePilot contacted me recently.
He flew passenger aircraft for nearly 30 years before developing serious neurological damage and losing his flying career. For almost two decades, he has been trying to force proper investigation of what pilots and cabin crew call contaminated cabin air.
Then he sent me the evidence.
Parliamentary records. House of Lords testimony. A 320-page report published by the British pilots union. University testing. BBC Panorama. Court cases. Coroner evidence. Litigation in several countries.
This story has reached Parliament, scientists, courts, unions and broadcasters.
Yet most passengers have probably never heard of it.
Most commercial jets use something called bleed air. Compressed air is taken from the engines and fed into the aircraft cabin for passengers and crew to breathe.
If engine seals leak, oil and other fluids can enter that air supply.
That is where the controversy begins.
In 2006, 27 BALPA pilots were tested by researchers at University College London after concerns about exposure to contaminated cabin air.
John Hoyte was one of them.
All 27 showed evidence consistent with toxic exposure and reduced cognitive performance.
@BBCPanorama investigated the issue in its 2008 documentary Something in the Air.
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee heard evidence about contaminated cabin air in 2007 and 2008.
In February 2007, around 40 passengers on an XL Airways flight reported illness following a cabin air incident. Litigation followed, including proceedings involving passengers who secured the right to pursue claims in the United States.
A UK coroner raised concerns about contaminated cabin air following the death of pilot Richard Westgate in 2012.
And the issue has never gone away.
France has seen occupational disease claims involving aerotoxic syndrome. Litigation involving pilots, crew and passengers has continued internationally. US law firm Morgan & Morgan is now advertising for airline passengers and crew who say they were injured by toxic cabin air.
John founded the Aerotoxic Association at the Houses of Parliament in 2007. The organisation says more than 2,500 people have contacted it believing they were affected.
Then there is one fact I find particularly difficult to ignore.
Almost every major commercial jet uses engine bleed air for cabin ventilation.
The Boeing 787 Dreamliner does not.
Boeing designed the 787 with an electrically powered air system that does not take cabin air from the engines.
So the technology to avoid engine bleed air already exists.
The UK Civil Aviation Authority continues to say that available research has not established a causal link between cabin air exposure and long-term illness.
That disagreement is exactly why this deserves serious investigation.
John has spent nearly 20 years collecting evidence. He has parliamentary material, medical evidence, technical reports, court documents and first-hand testimony. He is also prepared to speak openly with investigative journalists.
He can introduce journalists to Samantha Sabatino, a passenger from the 2007 XL Airways incident whose experience entered the parliamentary record.
So this post has one purpose.
I WANT A SERIOUS INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST TO PICK THIS UP.
Not a two-minute news item. A proper investigation.
If you work in investigative journalism, aviation, medicine, toxicology or occupational health, John is willing to answer questions and provide the documents behind this story.
Before millions of us board aircraft every year and breathe cabin air for hours at a time, we deserve a clear answer to a very simple question.
WHAT EXACTLY ARE WE BREATHING?
Sources:
@AerotoxicAssoc (Aerotoxic Association)
@BALPApilots (British Airline Pilots Association)
@forthepeople (Morgan & Morgan) gcaqe org (Global Cabin Air Quality Executive)
@BBCPanorama covered it in 2008 with a full documentary titled Something in the Air.
@heraldtweets
@WSJ
@FlightGlobal
@TheCanaryUK
---
@TMZ @thevivafrei
Helen Knight retweeted
🚨 READ THIS. SHARE THIS. BECAUSE NOBODY IN POWER WILL. 🚨
HE LIVES IN OUR COUNTRY.
HE TAKES OUR MONEY.
HE CALLS OUR HOME "THE ABODE OF INFIDELS."
AND HE JUST REPORTED A BRITISH MP TO THE POLICE FOR DISAGREEING WITH HIM.
His name is Roshan Muhammed Salih. He runs 5Pillars. And what you are about to read will make your blood run cold.
Not because it is shocking. Because every single word of it is documented, sourced, and sitting in plain sight. And nobody. Not one single authority in this country. Has done a damn thing about it.
Let's start with Hamas.
On October 7th 2023 Hamas butchered 1,200 of our allies. They raped women next to the bodies of their murdered friends. They dragged grandmothers through the streets. They burned families alive. The world watched in horror.
Roshan Salih told his 210,000 followers on X that the IDF probably killed their own people and made the whole thing up.
He called the United Nations rape investigation "a complete fraud."
He has never. Not once. Condemned Hamas.
Not once.
Because in his own words, published in the Guardian, in black and white, with his name on it, Hamas are "legitimate actors." His words. The Guardian. 2009. Go and read it.
Now let's talk about the Taliban.
While British soldiers were coming home in body bags from Afghanistan. While Gold Star families were burying their children. While the nation grieved. Roshan Salih went on camera and said "I am supportive of Taliban, wish them a lot of success."
This year, in August 2026, he published a piece celebrating five years of Taliban rule calling Afghanistan "more Islamic, largely at peace."
More Islamic.
Girls banned from school. Journalists executed. Women flogged in the street.
More Islamic. That is his measure of success. Written on a platform operating out of London. Out of our country. Using our laws. Hiding behind our press freedoms.
Now here is where it gets truly ugly.
This man spent five years as the head of news for Press TV in London. The Iranian regime's propaganda arm. The channel Ofcom banned from our airwaves for taking editorial orders directly from Tehran. The channel that to this day is linked to Iranian intelligence operations on British soil. He was their man in London. Their first London news editor. Their voice in our capital city.
And while he was there he wrote in the Guardian that the Iranian government is "fundamentally decent."
The Iranian government that bankrolls Hamas.
The Iranian government that arms Hezbollah.
The Iranian government that hangs gay teenagers from cranes.
Fundamentally decent.
Before Press TV he was at Al Jazeera. Qatar's state-funded Muslim Brotherhood-aligned propaganda network. Before that the Islam Channel. Fined by Ofcom for antisemitic hate speech. His entire career is a tour of our enemies' payrolls. 18 years of Saudi, Qatari and Iranian money flowing through his bank account. 18 years. And then he had the nerve to tell you he was "completely independent."
He is not independent. He never was.
Now look at who he surrounds himself with.
His book was launched by the Islamic Human Rights Commission. A charity now under ACTIVE statutory inquiry by the Charity Commission. Breach of trust. Funding extremist activities. Their chair has been linked to Hezbollah support. This is where Salih chose to launch his book. Not Waterstones. Not a university. A charity being investigated for funding extremists.
His 5Pillars co-founder Dilly Hussain platforms Taliban spokespeople. His website has published content from Moazzam Begg. Arrested at an Al-Qaeda safe house in Pakistan. That Moazzam Begg. His platform gave an interview to Mark Collett. An actual neo-Nazi. An interview even the press regulator ruled was discriminatory.
One platform. The Taliban. Al-Qaeda. Neo-Nazis. Hamas denial. Iranian regime propaganda. Hezbollah support.
All of it under his editorial control.
All of it hosted on servers paid for with our charity money.
Yes. Our charity money.
In 2020 5Pillars received a £3,000 COVID emergency grant from the Public Interest News Foundation. British charity money. Taxpayer-adjacent money given to help journalism survive a pandemic. Three days later his platform published a video calling homosexuality "a gross crime against Allah." When the regulator found them guilty of inciting hatred against the LGBTQ community he did not apologise. He quit the regulator. He called for a separate Muslim press regulator outside British standards. Outside British law. Outside British accountability.
Because British standards do not apply to him.
Nothing does.
His 5Pillars company at Companies House has a confirmation statement that is currently overdue. He cannot even be bothered to file basic legal paperwork while running a terror-adjacent media operation in the heart of London.
And it gets worse. It gets so much worse.
In 2017 under his editorship 5Pillars produced a video that former government Extremism Commissioner Sara Khan documented in detail. A video explicitly promoting "physical jihad." The caliphate. Islamic penal codes. Stoning. Amputation. The exact ideology that sent British Muslims to join ISIS. Produced. Edited. Published. Under his name. On his platform.
Physical jihad.
From London.
In 2024 he declared on camera that "our focus as Muslims must be to ensure that Israel ceases to exist, no matter how long it takes."
No matter how long it takes.
From our country.
And now this week. Today. October 8th 2026. The day this post goes out. Fresh from his keyboard. 5Pillars reported Reform UK MP Robert Jenrick to the Metropolitan Police and the Prevent counter-extremism programme.
Why?
Because Jenrick said the Islamification of Britain is one of the greatest threats to our way of life.
Because Jenrick wants to ban the burqa.
Because Jenrick wants to end Sharia courts.
Because Jenrick wore a hoodie saying Hamas are terrorists.
For this 5Pillars wants him arrested under the Public Order Act. Referred to Prevent. The programme built to stop terrorism. Being used against a British MP by a man who called Hamas legitimate actors and praised the Taliban on camera.
Read that sentence again. As many times as you need to.
The man who promotes physical jihad wants to Prevent the man who says Hamas are terrorists.
This is not hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is accidental. This is a strategy. Deliberate. Calculated. Relentless. Use our laws against us. Weaponise our tolerance. Report the patriots. Shield the extremists. Scream Islamophobia at anyone who looks too closely. File police complaints against MPs while filing zero about yourself despite 28 years of documented pro-terror content sitting in plain sight on the internet.
He called Reform UK voters "outright racists and Islamophobes."
He called Jewish interfaith volunteers "Zionist infiltrators."
He dismissed the grooming gang scandal as "fake noise" designed to help Nigel Farage.
He said Muslims in Britain should pull their children out of school especially the girls.
He called for a mass physical training programme for Muslims to defend themselves.
Defend themselves against what?
He does not say.
He does not need to.
His audience knows.
This is who is operating in our country. Right now. Today. With 210,000 followers being fed a daily diet of Hamas apologia, Taliban celebration, Israeli elimination, Prevent manipulation, and anti-British hatred dressed up as news.
28 years.
Not one charge.
Not one arrest.
Not one serious parliamentary debate.
Not one serious newspaper investigation beyond what you are reading right now.
Just a man in London calling our home the Abode of Infidels while we pay for his charity grants, protect him with our laws, and allow him to report our elected politicians to the police for saying what the majority of this country believes.
The Charity Commission is circling his IHRC allies.
The press regulator already convicted him twice.
His own company is delinquent at Companies House.
His own words are the prosecution case.
We do not need new laws.
We do not need new powers.
We need the authorities we already have to do the job they already exist to do.
And we need every single person who reads this to share it until someone in power cannot ignore it anymore.
Because Roshan Muhammed Salih has had 28 years to love this country.
He called it the Abode of Infidels.
He made his position clear.
Now it is time we made ours.
SHARE THIS POST. TAG YOUR MP. TAG YOUR MEDIA. TAG EVERYONE.
BECAUSE SILENCE IS HOW WE GOT HERE.
Watching the folic acid petition ticker and thought we’d hit the target when we still had a way to go. 🙄😂
Helen Knight retweeted
English Constitution Society
To His Majesty King Charles III
Buckingham Palace
London, SW1A 1AA
@RoyalFamily @POTUS @realDonaldTrump
Your Majesty,
Subject: Pre-Action Protocol Letter Concerning the Inalienable Birthright of Englishmen and Women, Past Repeals of Eternal Laws including 1867 and 1947, and Perjury of the Coronation Oath to God
I write to Your Majesty with the deepest reverence, as a loyal subject, on a matter piercing the soul of our constitution and Your sacred Oath to Almighty God. This letter serves as a pre-action protocol, contemplating proceedings that may amount to impeachment, should Your Majesty fail to rectify the perjury of Your Coronation Oath by upholding the inalienable rights enshrined in the English Bill of Rights 1689, Magna Carta 1215, the Charter of the Forest 1225, the Coronation Charter of Henry I 1100, and the Acts of Union 1707 and 1800—rights affirmed as the eternal birthright of all Englishmen and women by the Act of Settlement 1701. I seek to persuade Your Majesty that these rights, repeatedly declared "for ever," have been unlawfully repealed in prior reigns, notably in 1867 and 1947, that such repeals are ultra vires, void, and a sin against God, and that Your Majesty must restore their full force to honour Your vow.
The English Bill of Rights 1689, a sacred trilogy of its Declaration of Reasons, Declaration of Rights, and enacting clauses, forges an unbreakable contract between Crown and people. Its enacting words thunder thrice: "All which their Majesties are contented and pleased shall be declared, enacted and established by authority of this present Parliament, and shall stand, remain and be the law of this realm for ever"—a triple seal of eternity, first for all its provisions, again as "and shall stand, remain and be the law of this realm for ever" in confirmation, and thirdly in barring any "popish prince" who "shall be excluded and be for ever incapable to inherit, possess or enjoy the crown." "For ever" brooks no end; it is absolute, eternal, admitting no repeal—not for a day, not for a reign, but all time henceforth. The Declaration of Reasons vows that "their religion, laws and liberties might not again be in danger of being subverted," a pledge that no future act—by Crown, Parliament, or any hand—can lawfully imperil these rights, locking them beyond the reach of change forevermore. The Declaration of Rights asserts them as "undoubted rights and liberties," demanding "that no declarations, judgments, doings or proceedings to the prejudice of the people in any of the said premises ought in any wise to be drawn hereafter into consequence or example"—a command that no future moment, no cunning reinterpretation, may erode them, a perpetuity as fixed as stone. It binds "all officers and ministers whatsoever" to "serve their Majesties and their successors according to the same in all times to come"—not for a fleeting season, but every hour of every age, an unending chain. The succession "shall from time to time descend" to Protestants, a rhythm of eternity pulsing through all generations. These rights—freedom of speech in Parliament, the right to petition without fear, no taxation without consent, no excessive bail or cruel punishments—are not frail statutes but pillars of liberty, cemented "for ever."
Magna Carta 1215, confirmed in 1297, echoes this eternity with unrelenting force. Its first clause proclaims: "We have granted also, and given to all the freemen of our realm, for us and our heirs for ever, all the liberties written below, to have and to hold to them and their heirs of us and our heirs"—a grant not for a fleeting breath, but all time, binding every monarch, including Your Majesty, without shadow of exception. Clause 60 extends these "to be held… for ever" across the realm, a universal permanence no hand can undo. The Confirmatio Cartarum 1297 decrees it "to be kept in every point without breach" and "in perpetuity," a double lock—no violation, no end, an iron vow. These liberties—freedom from arbitrary imprisonment, justice swift and sure, limits on feudal dues—are the bedrock of English Law, declared eternal by the Crown’s own seal.
The Charter of the Forest 1225, twin to Magna Carta, seals its rights with the same unyielding oath: "These liberties… we have granted to all the freemen of our realm… for ever, to have and to hold to them and their heirs"—a mirror of Magna Carta’s promise, protecting common rights against royal overreach, fixed beyond all alteration for all ages. Its "for ever" stands as a sentinel, guarding these liberties through every generation, a covenant no power may shatter.
The Coronation Charter of Henry I 1100, a root of our liberties, pledges "to make free the Church of God" and abolish evil customs "for all time"—a breadth spanning every future instant, leaving no gap. It grants "the law of King Edward… to be held and observed forever" with additions—a restoration of ancient rights, made perpetual, a foundation for all later charters. These promises, sworn by a king, bind his heirs, including Your Majesty, in an unbroken line of duty stretching to eternity.
The Act of Union 1707, uniting England and Scotland, adds its own eternal weight. Article I declares the two kingdoms "united into one kingdom… for ever after," and Article XIX ensures Scotland’s courts "remain in all time coming," with laws preserved unless expressly altered—terms of perpetuity locking the union and its legal frame. The Act of Union 1800, joining Great Britain and Ireland, mirrors this: Article I unites them "for ever after," a bond "in all time to come" (implied in its permanence). These Acts, part of the realm’s laws, reinforce the "for ever" of rights and governance, admitting no breach.
The Act of Settlement 1701 crowns these laws as sacrosanct: "the Laws of England are the Birthright of the People thereof"—not a gift to be withdrawn, but an ineradicable inheritance, owned by every soul born to this realm, eternal as the earth itself. It mandates that "all the Kings and Queens who shall ascend the Throne of this Realm ought to administer the Government of the same according to the said Laws," and "all their Officers and Ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same"—an eternal "ought," a command without cease, tying Your Majesty to these "for ever" rights as a birthright beyond all repeal.
Yet, in prior reigns, this sacred edifice has been profaned. Provisions of the Bill of Rights—our birthright—have been repealed, notably in 1867 and 1947, alongside breaches of Magna Carta’s echoes and others. The Promissory Oaths Act 1867 altered oath structures, weakening the Bill’s "all times to come" for officers. The Statute Law Revision Act 1947 pruned its text, defying its triple "for ever." These acts, and others, are ultra vires—beyond lawful power—for no authority exists within these texts to undo what is eternal; they are void, null from their birth, as if never spoken, clashing with the immutable will of "for ever," "in perpetuity," "all time." Such repeals are a sin, a moral and divine transgression against the eternal covenant.
At Your Coronation, Your Majesty swore to God: "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? … Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgments? … The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God." These laws—Magna Carta’s "for ever," the Bill’s triple "for ever," the Unions’ "for ever after," the birthright’s permanence—are the "laws and customs of the realm" sworn to divine witness. To abide the repeals of 1867, 1947, or any other, or fail to void them, perjures this Oath—a breach not merely of law, but of faith with God who heard Your vow. "So help me God" invokes divine judgment; to break "for ever" is to scorn that pact, a sin staining Your soul and crown. James II fled for subverting less; Your Majesty’s reign must not bear this guilt.
I beseech Your Majesty to proclaim these repeals—1867, 1947, and all others—ultra vires, void, and a sin, restoring Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, the Acts of Union, and all eternal laws as the birthright of Your people. Declare within 28 days that "for ever" means forever, "all times to come" binds today, "birthright" cannot be torn asunder—leaving no doubt, no escape. Act to nullify these breaches, lest I seek remedy for this divine perjury. My prayer is Your reign upholds our liberties, unmarred by time or fault.
I remain, with all honour,
Your Majesty’s humble and obedient servant,
Graham Moore
Chairman
English Constitution Society
Helen Knight retweeted
*takes a deep breath*
1. Farage kicking Lowe out of the party because Lowe said we need mass deportations.
2. Farage, Yusef and Anderson all trumping up false charges against Lowe to try and have him arrested and imprisoned.
3. Farage telling Winston Marshall that we need the Muslim vote.
4. Farage telling Steven Edginton that mass deportations are impossible.
5. Reform using Boriswave arrivals to fill candidate vacancies in local council elections.
6. Reform being a retirement home for failed ex-Tories, particularly Nadhim Zahawi.
7. Farage and Tice turning their nose up at the patriot rallies in London and describing them as "that lot."
8. Farage doing Cameo's for seventy quid to say, "Up The 'Ra!"
9. Reform turning down the opportunity to unite with Restore even though the combined vote share would put them ahead of Labour in the polls.
10. Restore publishing very legally dense, workable, intelligent, well thought-out, policy papers to deal with the issues that we face.
11. Reform voters behaving like lefties and calling Restore voters knuckle dragging racists ... despite agreeing with and then parroting all the same arguments we make first, only six months later when it's more socially palatable as we continue to shift the Overton window.
12. Reform pinching all of Restore's policies when they realise their own are shallow, unworkable, and a bit crap in comparison.
13. Reform being stained by crypto bung sleaze, which I don't personally give a shit about, but which the broader public clearly does.
14. Richard Tice being, well, Richard Tice.
15. Rupert Lowe being a based, authentic, leader who I actually believe in.
... there are more, but I need to make lunch now.
unavailable
Helen Knight retweeted
It’s the end of National Suicide Prevention Month, but this group is something to be aware of every day of the year. Please share 🙏 ⬇️
share.google/6XVtzRgxKY9V6fG…
Helen Knight retweeted
This footage is going to become a big headache for the police.
A police officer appears to pretend he has been hit by a car.
Seconds later, the elderly man behind the wheel is dragged out of the vehicle and thrown to the ground.
How are the public supposed to trust the police to enforce the law when incidents like this happen?
This needs investigating properly, and if the footage is as it appears, there must be accountability for every officer involved.
Helen Knight retweeted
En Ontario, Canadá 🇨🇦, acaban de eutanasiar a una anciana, cristiana practicante, contra su voluntad. La escena misma es de terror: la mujer gritaba y se movía para que no le inyecten la aguja con el veneno intravenoso que la mataría, lo que ocasionó que la enfermera la termine ensangrentando con la aguja. Sí, es muy gráfico, pero es importante compartirlo para entender la realidad macabra de la eutanasia.
La chica de la foto es su nieta y representante legal, quien hizo lo posible para frenar esta locura. El procedimiento de la eutanasia lo comenzaron mientras la nieta estaba de viaje y sin su conocimiento y consentimiento. La anciana fue sometida a una seria de preguntas que no entendía, ni siquiera sabía qué tipo de procedimiento iban a aplicarle...
El 5% de las muertes totales en Canadá son por eutanasia, el nivel más alto del mundo.
Our 83-year-old Christian grandmother was euthanised against her will under Canada's assisted dying system - she died covered in blood with her hands clasped in prayer trib.al/vqrDMuf
Helen Knight retweeted
This is the vile leftist who attacked and put into hospital one of our Restore Britains campaigners today! Her parents must be so proud of her and i hope she gets time for what she’s done! Share her face that’s someone who hates our country and the people in it and would rather see us all raped and murdered!
Head coverings, Maxine?
Today the Amax team visited the beautiful Gurdwara in Gravesend, just minutes from our office.
We are always made to feel so welcome, and it is such a peaceful and tranquil place to visit.
A huge thank you to the Sikh community for your warmth, hospitality and everything you do for the people of Gravesend and our surrounding villages. 🙏
We are very proud to be part of such a diverse and caring local community.
@AmaxEstates @VisitGravesend @graveshambc
