Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol) header
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol) profile picture

On-chain Orderbook Trading: tightest spreads, near zero fees, LP vaults

Etherlink
Joined January 2024
Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)Photo by Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  (@HanjiProtocol)
Hanji deployed on @monad in stealth weeks ago and is now top 2 in weekly volume. Hanji's orderbook has: - fully onchain execution & settlement - zero maker fees & near-zero taker fees - a vault-based liquidity model for fees and spread capture You can try it now ๐Ÿ‘‡
45
32
4
256
28,033
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  retweeted
After $2.45B+ in volume, Hanji is past the question of whether order books can work onchain. Join @dmitrytez, Founder of @hanjiprotocol to talk: ๐Ÿ”น $641M vol in 30D ๐Ÿ”ธ Fully on-chain order books ๐Ÿ”น CEX-style execution on @Base, @Monad, and @etherlink ๐Ÿ‘‡ nitter.cf/i/spaces/1qKDzWjOZBwJVโ€ฆ
9
8
27
7,863
two milestones today >$50m daily volume >$2b cumulative volume
1
3
221
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  retweeted
Top 5 DEXs on Base by 7D volume 1. @aeroxyz > $2.547B 2. @Uniswap > $2.493B 3. @PancakeSwap > $542.88M 4. @0xtristero > $127.86M 5. @HanjiProtocol > $62.07M Aerodrome and Uniswap are still the main liquidity venues on Base
5
3
1
19
1,417
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  retweeted
most DEXs ask you to trust a curve. Hanji asks you to read the book fully onchain spot CLOB. real bids, real asks, deterministic fills, self-custody intact. the same orderbook a CEX runs, minus the custody risk and the trust AMMs priced DeFi for the last cycle. Orderbooks price it for the next one
1
3
17
470
most DEXs ask you to trust a curve. Hanji asks you to read the book fully onchain spot CLOB. real bids, real asks, deterministic fills, self-custody intact. the same orderbook a CEX runs, minus the custody risk and the trust AMMs priced DeFi for the last cycle. Orderbooks price it for the next one
1
3
17
470
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  retweeted
everyone said a full orderbook + matching engine could not live on-chain hanji put both there: preconfirmations on etherlink, parallel execution on monad, ~15-20ms ux feel tight spreads. visible depth. feterministic fills.
3
1
16
596
everyone said a full orderbook + matching engine could not live on-chain hanji put both there: preconfirmations on etherlink, parallel execution on monad, ~15-20ms ux feel tight spreads. visible depth. feterministic fills.
3
1
16
596
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  retweeted
The orderbook was always the endgame.
1
1
8
218
The orderbook was always the endgame.
1
1
8
218
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  retweeted
most DEXs make you trade against a formula while hanji makes you trade against a real market full onchain orderbook: live bids, live asks, real price discovery tight spreads, visible depth, deterministic fills CEX execution, full self-custody on-chain markets should behave like real markets
2
15
225
most DEXs make you trade against a formula while hanji makes you trade against a real market full onchain orderbook: live bids, live asks, real price discovery tight spreads, visible depth, deterministic fills CEX execution, full self-custody on-chain markets should behave like real markets
2
15
225
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  retweeted
AMMs approximate price. Orderbooks discover it. There's a difference.
1
3
14
169
AMMs approximate price. Orderbooks discover it. There's a difference.
1
3
14
169
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  retweeted
appchain = sovereign execution, permanent liquidity problem every isolated chain starts at zero same LPs, same capital, split across a hundred walled gardens spreads stay wide. arb bots eat the rest. general-purpose chains don't have that problem liquidity compounds LP positions become collateral orderbook depth feeds aggregators feeds more flow appchains optimized for sovereignty they gave up depth to get there this is not a UX complaint it's structural: fragmented settlement = fragmented price discovery = permanently worse execution hanji deploys on Monad, Base, Etherlink a CLOB on a chain with aggregated flow is a different product than a CLOB in a silo orderbooks win long-term but only if the chain underneath lets depth compound
3
16
213
appchain = sovereign execution, permanent liquidity problem every isolated chain starts at zero same LPs, same capital, split across a hundred walled gardens spreads stay wide. arb bots eat the rest. general-purpose chains don't have that problem liquidity compounds LP positions become collateral orderbook depth feeds aggregators feeds more flow appchains optimized for sovereignty they gave up depth to get there this is not a UX complaint it's structural: fragmented settlement = fragmented price discovery = permanently worse execution hanji deploys on Monad, Base, Etherlink a CLOB on a chain with aggregated flow is a different product than a CLOB in a silo orderbooks win long-term but only if the chain underneath lets depth compound
3
16
213
Hanji Protocol ๐ŸŸ  retweeted
๐Ÿงต most defi protocols borrow a price from chainlink to run their liquidations the book IS the price here's why that changes everything
1
18
16
206
๐Ÿงต most defi protocols borrow a price from chainlink to run their liquidations the book IS the price here's why that changes everything
1
18
16
206
๐Ÿงต cascade risk is also different AMM: price follows a curve regardless of real intent liquidation hits, curve moves, next position liquidates, repeat CLOB: each liquidation order is absorbed by bids thick book = less price impact = cascade slows naturally depth is visible. risk is readable.
1
1
2
204
๐Ÿงต the oracle was a workaround it exists because AMMs can't discover price on their own on-chain orderbooks don't need it for spot price discovery is the default, not a feature this is what it means for the book to be the price source
2
26