That would undermine the reason we have jurors, muppet.
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
1
3
115
I'm glad you are politically homeless and I hope you were evicted because of this tweet
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
5
67
What's inexcusable is strangling your three children to death!
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
1
6
102
Says this and then turns off the comments. Calls herself an influencer! Of what, murder!?
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
3
4
865
The foreperson claimed the one juror wasn’t ‘following tie law’ That was her opinion. It doesn’t make it a fact.
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
1
5
73
Could it be that one juror understood the definition of the word premeditated?
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
1
5
21
163
"make the public go through this". This dumb b*tch thinks only if herself. BTW there's no LAW telling you what YOUR feeling regarding beyond a reasonable doubt it.
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
101
What "law" was he refusing to apply, Hannah? The one that requires jurors to set free rich white ladies who unalive their kids? That one? Was it that one?
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
1
22
309
I guess I'm ignorant because I don't remember any law that says "it's ok to kill your children if you're crazy or just don't feel the greatest that day." Can anyone educate me on this law?
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
1
3
144
Haha the same people that want infinite 3rd worlders flooding us suddenly have a problem when taxes are used to put a murderer away
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
7
15
269
20,970
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
1
6
238
So we’re at “let’s just rig the jury to get the verdict we want” Very cool
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
1
1
4
332
This person supports mothers murdering their children.
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
2
97
Uh-huh
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
3
70
Talk about an alternate reality Hope no man married this thing
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
4
35
I think the judge should have removed the other 11 people so I could have gotten the outcome I wanted!
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
2
15
260
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
3
36
Now imagine it was the reverse. 11 who wanted to convict and 1 hold out…….
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
3
1
3
309
“Make the public go through this” lmao you somehow managed to make this about you.
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
11
38
712
21,048
She’s gonna be so pissed when the jury is sequestered and no cameras are allowed in the courtroom for the retrial.
Hannah Cox
@HannahDCox
Sep 4
This is ridiculous. You have one juror refusing to apply the law. They should be tossed for an alternate. The fact they’re going to make the public go through this (and pay for this) again is inexcusable.
3
4
36
349
Load more