@Harf1e

I identify as an oligarch.

United Kingdom
Joined March 2011
🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile in England Heartbreaking story of an 11 year old Girl was found dead in a Park in Elmley Castle Police have now concluded their investigation and state the death wasn’t suspicious So either 11 year olds are just dropping dead or there is another cover up in place
193
1,067
46
3,123
47,826
Mac Harfie retweeted
🚨 EXPOSED: ANDY BURNHAM HANDED 55 MILLION POUNDS OF TAXPAYER CASH TO MAN CITY OWNERS! Remember when Burnham panicked on national television last month to fiercely defend Manchester City against Premier League financial cheating charges? Now I have the official paper trail explaining exactly why he acts like a dedicated public relations agent for the United Arab Emirates! Official records prove that during his time as mayor, Burnham personally chaired the meetings that handed 55 million pounds in taxpayer loans to Jersey based property companies ultimately controlled by Man City owner Sheikh Mansour. This cash was drained straight out of a 300 million pound state housing fund supposedly reserved for struggling local developers. Instead of helping British builders construct homes, Burnham rubber stamped a massive taxpayer loan for the Deputy Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates! Sheikh Mansour is one of the richest men on the planet and could secure private corporate finance in thirty seconds. Yet Burnham gave a foreign billionaire preferential access to a public cash machine funded entirely by your hard earned wages!!!!! Labour politicians are bleeding the domestic working class dry with brutal taxes while secretly operating a VIP fast lane for Middle Eastern royalty. Retweet this investigation immediately to expose Andy Burnham and demand a full parliamentary inquiry into this Man City money scandal. 🇬🇧🔥
613
4,792
339
8,839
383,122
By amending the treason laws, Tony Blair effectively protected government officials from criminal charges. This gave leaders unchecked freedom to commit acts detrimental to the nation and its people. TREASON 🇬🇧
539
2,261
133
5,695
43,355
Restore Britain opposes the mandatory fortification of flour with synthetic folic acid. Food should be left as natural as possible. This petition is about to hit 100k, and that will allow me to speak in Parliament opposing it. Please sign/share. petition.parliament.uk/petit…
628
4,692
229
16,813
237,012
Mac Harfie retweeted
THE DEEP STATE JUST GOT CAUGHT RED-HANDED AGAIN! CIA OFFICIALLY ADMITS CANCER IS BIOLOGICALLY IDENTICAL TO PARASITES… Johns Hopkins BURIED cheap anti-parasitic drugs that CURE cancer in weeks… While the Medical Cartel (Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Merck, J&J & Roche) OWNS the entire trillion-dollar cancer industry and profits off your suffering!
258
9,608
326
21,772
932,009
Mac Harfie retweeted
Oh brilliant! … tougher sentences for men who rape children are delayed! because there isn’t enough prison space. But the man who denies criminal damage after allegedly slashing a migrant dinghy is on remand because they say he poses a “significant risk to public safety.” Which tells us apparently child rapists aren’t a “significant risk to public safety” then?
191
1,991
71
4,831
31,293
Mac Harfie retweeted
If you think DEPOPULATION is a conspiracy why would there have been a debate in House of Commons on depopulation in RURAL areas? 🤔 Are they thinking of replacing us or depopulating us? commonslibrary.parliament.uk…
30
158
11
271
10,842
The Migrant Hotel files. How much are the hotel owners really charging? Exclusive documents show my previous hotel was charging £87108 for 170 “guests” An invoice would be sent to Serco (alternate name Reed & Mackay which needs investigating who they are really are) and several days later a reply would come with the exact amount on a pre-paid card would be sent to charge. This contract ran for 132 consecutive weeks, total money sent was a shade under £11.5 million. And this was just for one hotel for 2 and a half years. When the hotel contract ended the hotel owners made every staff member redundant, closed the doors and put the hotel up for sale, with the hotel now trading under a different name and company after sitting abandoned for 12 months.
27
202
12
803
63,149
Have a break... have a drug.
Folic Acid in Kit Kats
33
410
11
1,017
10,423
Tiny Hat Nation Since 1492. Shyster rings a bell. 🔔 archive.org/details/internat…
244
2,619
144
6,792
111,228
🚨BREAKING: A British man stated on social media that he does not want to see Palestinian flags displayed all across the UK. Police officers came to his house at 4am and arrested him. Am I crazy, or has the UK officially fallen?
3,132
9,811
597
35,042
1,024,453
Mac Harfie retweeted
🚨BREAKING: CIA Officer says bank records show Senator Lindsey Graham is laundering money from the Ukraine war back into his own personal bank accounts. CIA Officer says it’s “significant amounts of money” being laundered back to Lindsey Graham…
1,123
2,963
221
7,935
305,106
She raised the alarm 181 times. 181 separate referrals, about girls being groomed and abused in one northern town. For years, almost nothing happened. Then they made her redundant. Her name was Sara Rowbotham. She was born in Middleton, Greater Manchester. She was not a police officer, not a senior manager, not a politician. She worked for the NHS in Rochdale, on a small team called the Crisis Intervention Team, offering sexual health support to young people. She started there in 2004. It was the kind of job where teenagers told you things they told nobody else. And what they were telling her was horrifying. Young girls, many of them vulnerable, many of them already known to services, were being groomed, passed around and sexually exploited by groups of men. This was not a rumour. It was not one case. It was a pattern. So she did exactly what she was supposed to do. She reported it. Between 2005 and 2011, Sara and her team made 181 referrals detailing the abuse and grooming of young people. 181. Each one was a child. Each one was a warning. Here is the part that should make people angry. Those warnings went to the agencies whose job was to protect children. And again and again, they were not acted on. Some of the girls were treated as if they were making choices about their own lives, rather than as children being abused. Think about what that actually meant. A girl of thirteen or fourteen, being exploited by grown men, and the system looking at her and seeing a problem teenager instead of a victim. Sara would not accept that. She kept reporting. She kept pushing. She kept telling anyone who would listen that this was happening, and it was happening now. In May 2012, nine men were convicted in the Rochdale grooming case. Suddenly, everyone wanted to know how it had been allowed to go on for so long. That year, Sara gave evidence. She told the Home Affairs Select Committee in Parliament that Rochdale's child protection services had failed to act on her alerts, and that the abuse had been widespread. She said it in public. About the system she still worked within. Two years later, in 2014, she was made redundant. Two more years. Then gone. The woman who had done more than almost anyone to expose what happened in Rochdale was out of a job. For a while, it looked as if that would be the end of it. Another person who had told the truth, quietly moved aside. Then, in May 2017, the BBC broadcast a drama called Three Girls, based on the Rochdale case. Sara was in it. The actress Maxine Peake played her. Millions of people watched a sexual health worker refuse, again and again, to let it go, and wondered who she really was. Within days, a petition was started calling for her to be formally recognised. It gathered more than 275,000 signatures. Consider what it took to get there. Years of being ignored by the people who should have listened. Losing her job. And it took a television drama for the country to find out her name. By then, she had already found another way to serve the town. She was elected as a local councillor for North Middleton, and she went on to become Deputy Leader of Rochdale Borough Council and its cabinet member for health and wellbeing. The woman who had been pushed out of the system ended up helping to run part of it. In 2018, she received a Special Recognition Award at the NHS Heroes Awards. That October she became an honorary member of the NSPCC's council. In 2021, she was appointed MBE for services to young people. Her case became one of the clearest examples in modern Britain of what happens when a frontline worker sees abuse and the institutions above her do not respond. It is now part of how social workers, health workers and police are trained to think about exploitation, and part of an ongoing national reckoning with grooming gangs that has still not finished.
145
2,457
71
9,366
132,203
A UK jury has refused to convict the two Muslim men involved in the Manchester Airport police assault. You can be Muslim in the UK, beat police officers, and walk free, but if you are a White kid, you will be arrested while you bleed out.
588
5,791
141
20,699
320,126
A UK family where both parents work full-time, pay full council tax, and earn enough to be 'doing alright' on paper, can't afford to take their kids to the Tower of London on a Saturday in 2026. Two adult tickets and two child tickets at standard price comes to roughly £100. Add £40-£80 in train fares and £50-£70 for lunch — that's around £200 for a single Saturday at one tourist attraction in their own capital city. A family on full Universal Credit, living in subsidised housing, paying no council tax, can take the same four people to the same Tower for £1 a ticket — £4 total — under the 'inclusive access' schemes most major UK attractions now run. The working family pays the full £200 day out AND covers — through their taxes — the £196 discount the benefits family gets on the same trip. Whatever the original intention of those schemes, this is the structure most UK working families are now living inside. Pay the full bill, then watch the people next door enjoy the day out you can't take your own kids to.
465
2,414
119
11,701
567,301
🚨 🚍 WHO IS BEING PAID TO MOVE ASYLUM SEEKERS AROUND BRITAIN? The Home Office is preparing a new national procurement for the transport of asylum seekers across the UK. It is worth looking closely at what is being built. THE NEW NATIONAL SERVICE The proposed Asylum Seeker Travel Services contract covers adult asylum seekers and unaccompanied asylum-seeking children. It also includes journeys arranged by the Home Office on behalf of local authorities. The Home Office has been considering how the requirement should be structured, including whether services should be divided between providers rather than delivered as one national operation. That matters because the supply chain can extend beyond the organisation holding the government contract to the companies actually arranging and providing journeys. THE COUNCILS There is a separate local-authority transport trail. Under the National Transfer Scheme, unaccompanied asylum-seeking children are transferred between councils around the UK. The current Home Office funding instructions are unusually clear about who pays. Transport from the entry council’s temporary placement to the receiving council is coordinated between the two authorities. Unless an alternative arrangement is agreed with the Home Office, the entry local authority pays the transport costs. Those costs therefore do not necessarily appear under one convenient national transport contract. They can sit within individual local-authority accounts. 24 HOURS A DAY. 365 DAYS A YEAR. The Home Office is also procuring transport as part of its Future Asylum Contracts Transformation programme. The specification calls for a 24/7/365 transportation service. It requires suitable roadworthy vehicles, professional drivers and an IT booking system. The operator must be capable of transporting asylum seekers, their dependants and permitted belongings, either independently or as directed by the Home Office. This is transport infrastructure, not simply the occasional hiring of a coach. SCOTLAND: 119,059 JOURNEYS Scotland provides an unusually clear example of the numbers involved. Its asylum-seeker free-bus pilot was backed by £2 million. By 10 February 2026, just over two months after launch, asylum-seeker passes had been used for 119,059 journeys. Bus operators had submitted reimbursement claims totalling £347,997.78. By 3 March, those claims had risen to £581,605.06. WHO PAYS FOR THE JOURNEYS? The council element deserves particular scrutiny. Under the National Transfer Scheme, transport for an unaccompanied asylum-seeking child is coordinated between the entry authority and the receiving authority. Home Office guidance states that, unless another arrangement is agreed, the entry local authority is responsible for the transport cost. That means expenditure can sit across individual council accounts rather than appearing as one national Home Office transport contract. At the same time, the Home Office is developing a new Asylum Seeker Travel Services contract which specifically includes arranging UASC transport on behalf of local authorities. And under the separate FACT procurement, the Home Office is seeking a 24/7/365 transport operation, including vehicles, professional drivers and an IT booking system for moving asylum seekers, dependants and permitted belongings. So the audit question is relatively simple: How much public money is being spent specifically on asylum transport, which authorities are paying it, and which transport companies are receiving it? I am now examining the Home Office and local-authority procurement record to answer that. Home Office — UASC funding instructions 2026/27⁠ Home Office — FACT asylum transport procurement⁠ Scottish Government — cost and usage of asylum-seeker bus passes⁠ Scottish Government — £581,605 operator claims disclosure⁠
15
159
10
349
4,182
“The council does not house migrants in HMOs and has no such pending applications.” Why are you lying @SalfordCouncil I literally have the list of Serco migrant HMOs in Salford, obtained from your council. And migrants at several HMOs in Salford have confirmed it on camera. manchestereveningnews.co.uk/…
60
612
5
2,490
27,793
It's been revealed tonight that crime in Crowborough has rocketed by 340% since invaders were dumped in the town at the beginning of the year. Get them all out!
222
3,354
31
12,775
150,157
The vast quangocracy is so much more malicious than just a few meaningless bodies which oversee newt preservation or tarmac thickness. These are the men and women running the country - unelected and entirely unaccountable to the taxpayer, and even the MP. Decisions outsourced to this committee or that body. Nobody takes responsibility, it’s always somebody else’s fault. Hiding behind nonsense jargon and acronyms. Hundreds of these agencies, panels, commissions, ombudsmans, boards, funds, authorities, offices. It is ENDLESS. Stuffed with politically correct apparatchiks who have one aim - to justify their existence. That means perpetuating the status quo - politically, culturally, socially. Anybody challenges the DEI shite, they will be excommunicated. Anybody genuinely fights for the taxpayer, they get the boot. So nobody does. And so it builds and builds, it evolves. It strengthens. Groupthink is everywhere. The answer is simple, in principle. Return power to the MPs, and therefore the people. Make the power accountable. But to do this means undoing decades of intricate and deliberate planning to build this parallel state power base. To think that can happen without resistance is naive, to say the least. The quangocracy cannot be reformed or conserved, it must be destroyed. Meddling will not work. Replacing it will fail. It must be ripped apart from limb from limb. Power must finally be restored to parliament. That is the only way to restore our democracy, and then restore our country.
250
1,617
63
8,476
109,886
Restore Britain's Henry Bolton OBE speaks to our conference.
31
186
14
1,076
38,951