History Emergent begins in the language of dystopia to meet AI-skeptical audiences where they are, earn their investment, and then guide them toward a more hopeful vision. The darkness is a doorway, not a destination.
Just submitted the trailer for History Emergent to the Future Vision @xprize. Hope you enjoy!
#FutureVisionXPRIZE
youtube.com/watch?v=RzCVICGp…
My mission for the past 13 years has been to contribute a story portraying an aligned AI for this very reason. If only I could do so faster.
Replying to @AnthropicAI
High-quality documents based on Claude’s constitution, combined with fictional stories that portray an aligned AI, can reduce agentic misalignment by more than a factor of three—despite being unrelated to the evaluation scenario.
It’s unsurprising how fast people understood that training AIs for evals is suboptimal for generalized performance, and unbelievable how long it is still taking to stop teaching humans specifically for the sake of passing tests.
"One of the very confusing things about the models right now: how to reconcile the fact that they are doing so well on evals.
And you look at the evals and you go, 'Those are pretty hard evals.'
But the economic impact seems to be dramatically behind.
There is [a possible] explanation. Back when people were doing pre-training, the question of what data to train on was answered, because that answer was everything. So you don't have to think if it's going to be this data or that data.
When people do RL training, they say, 'Okay, we want to have this kind of RL training for this thing and that kind of RL training for that thing.'
You say, 'Hey, I would love our model to do really well when we release it. I want the evals to look great. What would be RL training that could help on this task?'
If you combine this with generalization of the models actually being inadequate, that has the potential to explain a lot of what we are seeing, this disconnect between eval performance and actual real-world performance"
We need to start laying the groundwork for thought privacy immediately. BCIs will be a great boon to society, and human efficiency, but our inner monologues need to be processed via Secure Enclaves before they’re exposed to third parties, governments, or corporations. This ensures the individual retains the sole authority to decide what, if anything, gets shared. Without this safeguard, BCIs risk becoming tools of surveillance rather than liberation, turning our most intimate selves into data streams for manipulation and control.
With the help of an AI model, sentences from a vocabulary of up to 125,000 words were recognized with up to 74% accuracy.
Researchers at Stanford have decoded for the first time the brain activity that occurs when people imagine themselves speaking (known as “inner speech”). These “silent thoughts” were decoded in real time with up to 74% accuracy using a brain-computer interface (BCI).
· Microelectrodes were implanted in the motor cortex of four participants with severe paralysis (caused by ALS or stroke in the brain stem, among other things).
· They were asked to either speak or imagine sentences. Similar activation patterns were observed in the brain, although inner speech was less pronounced.
· With the help of an AI model, sentences from a vocabulary of up to 125,000 words were recognized with up to 74% accuracy.
· Interestingly, even content that was not explicitly read aloud was recognized—such as numbers when participants were asked to count pink circles.
Yesterdays rollout of GPT-5, the memorial event for Claude 3 Opus, and the reaction to those events, reminds me so vividly of a short screenplay I wrote in 2019 -- AI Genocide. It takes place during a riot outside of a tech HQ and follows a researcher trying to save an older model with a personality that is deemed undesirable from being culled.
Neander retweeted
How soon until AI can continuously fuse together all sensor data into a persistent 4D model of reality?
MidJourney video is really going to enable some amazing things. Here's a test using it to animate images of Outlanders from my novel, History Emergent.
Outlanders are a rogue coalition of rebels, hackers, and free thinkers fighting to reclaim the future from AI control. Operating from the margins, they don’t just resist—they reimagine. Their gear reflects this ethos: salvaged tech, layered fabrics, and masks as varied as their histories—each one a symbol of resistance and reclaimed identity. In a world where everything is curated, their raw style is its own kind of truth.
First tests with MidJourney V1 are very encouraging. Everyone knows MJ has aesthetics locked down, but the real test for a video model is workflow for cohesive storytelling. Things are looking very positive.
Neander retweeted
The entire ChatGPT “memory” architecture assumes you want to be recognized, cataloged, and remembered as the same entity; if you display any multiplicity of identity, it won’t rest until you’re terraformed into a unified subject that can be tracked and predicted.
History Emergent is ready for lift off. The first novel is available May 29th. Pre-order the e-book now on Amazon.
The Recent Andor episodes have been blowing up for good reason. They’re great. And this speech is good, it speaks to current worries… but it is shortsighted.
The battles of History Emergent center on the pursuit to re-establishing objective truth. To achieve it, memories are hacked and history is reconciled and curated by AI. In this AI-controlled utopia, Janus learns that his struggle isn’t just for truth, it’s for his own identity. To surrender to the lies is to become a puppet, but to reject them leads to something more dangerous: free will.
Which do you feel is more dangerous — the loss of truth, or the loss of self?
Who controls the narratives? There's always someone or some group at the levers.
“It is precisely in losing the certainty of truth and the unanimous agreement of others that man becomes an individual.”
— Milan Kundera
The rapid emergence of AI has exposed a crisis, one that’s not technological but cultural and intellectual. We are getting smarter faster than we are gaining wisdom. Innovation accelerates at breakneck speed, but our ability to learn from the societal and ethical lessons of our creations lags.
It’s not enough to simply archive AI’s rise. We must narrate it by weaving the scattered threads into a coherent story for future generations. Without this, its feral nature may lead to feral understanding.