Please help & share. Free šµšø
medicalaidforpalestinians.enā¦
Ian retweeted
Went to Anfield to see the Reds play the Champions Of England. Arteta using phrases like "the beautiful game" in his post match interview after serving that up? Embarrassing.
Thanks to everyone who has supported me. Mission accomplished but you can still donate.
medicalaidforpalestinians.enā¦
Striding either side of a dental appointment as you do. #stridingforpalestinians šµšø
medicalaidforpalestinians.enā¦...
strava.app.link/WL13ygNNz7b
Calm before the storm Striding for Palestinians šµšø medicalaidforpalestinians.en⦠#LFC #YNWA #stridingforpalestinians
Ian retweeted
Grim reading from Gabby Logan. Richard Keys and Andy Gray already had chequered pasts, but this is something else.
āEven years after Iād left Sky, it appeared I was still fair game for Gray and Keys,ā Logan wrote in The First Half. āI sat a row behind them on a flight to Istanbul for the Champions League Final in 2005, which I was covering for ITV. I was seven months pregnant with twins, and I was huge ā I looked like Iād swallowed a space hopper. In full earshot of me, and anyone who might be listening in our business-class cabin, Richard said: āSo, Andy, what do you think of pregnant women?āā
āāIām afraid I donāt find them very attractive, Richard. In fact, I never slept with my wife when she was pregnant with our kids.ā āSo you didnāt have sex, Andy?ā Keys asked. āNo, I didnāt say that, Richard.ā Then they laughed their heads off at their little ācomedyā routine.ā
āI was embarrassed and thought their comments were especially cruel, bearing in mind they both had children and wives of their own. Luckily, by that time I had been working with lovely men such as Ally McCoist and Andy Townsend at ITV, who were kind and caring, always asked after my wellbeing, and seemed genuinely excited for me about the babies. Keys and Gray were dinosaurs, waiting to become extinct.ā
Ian retweeted
šØ James Milner on Manchester City potentially facing a points deduction that could send them to the Championship:
šļø Interviewer: āJames, reports suggest Manchester City could face a huge points deduction, potentially leading to relegation, if the Premier League charges result in serious punishment. You played for City, but you also spent years at Liverpool competing against them for the biggest trophies. What would you make of it?
James Milner:
āLook, I have history with both clubs. Manchester City was an important part of my career, and I have respect for the people I worked with there. But playing for a club doesnāt mean you stop believing in fairnessā
āI was at Liverpool when we were chasing City for Premier League titles. We pushed ourselves to the limit, collected points, won games under enormous pressure, and sometimes finished a single point behind. Those seasons demanded everything from the players, the staff and the supportersā
āSo if the allegations are proven and the punishment is serious, people cannot expect everyone simply to shrug their shoulders and move on. What would all those points, all those battles and all those near-misses mean if the rules werenāt applied equally to every club?
āLet me be clear: allegations are not a verdict. Manchester City deserve a fair process, and nobody should pretend the final punishment has already been decided. But if serious breaches are established, the consequences must reflect the seriousness of what has been provenā
āAnd relegation? Thatās not something anyone should celebrate before the facts are settled. It would be enormous for the club, the players and the supporters. But the size of a club, its trophies, its wealth or its influence cannot decide whether the rules applyā
Interviewer: āSome City supporters will say rival fans simply want to see them punished because of their success. What would you say to that?
Milner:
āThatās the easiest way to dismiss the conversation, isnāt it? Call everyone jealous and avoid the actual questionā
āLiverpool and City gave us some incredible title races. The quality was unbelievable. But supporters who watched those seasons have a right to want answers if the integrity of the competition is questionedā
āImagine spending your life supporting a club, watching your team come painfully close to a title, and then being told that questions about the competition donāt matter because the other club is successful. You wouldnāt accept thatā
āIām not asking for Manchester City to be relegated because I played for Liverpool. Iām saying that if the same rules apply to every club, the same principles must apply when the consequences arriveā
āIf City are cleared, people must respect that outcome. If serious breaches are proven, City must accept the consequences. Thatās what fairness meansā
āAnd one final thing: donāt confuse respecting a club with believing it should be exempt from accountability. Those are two very different things.ā
Ian retweeted
šØ Arsene Wenger on reports Manchester City could face a 100-point deduction:
š£ļø Arsene Wenger: āOne hundred points is not enough. It does not even begin to cover the damage they have done. For years they have spent money that other clubs could not match, signed players that other clubs could not compete for, and won titles that other clubs had no realistic chance of challenging. And now we are supposed to believe a points deduction is the full price of that.
āThe Premier League has been distorted. The table has been distorted. The transfer market has been distorted. Clubs that tried to play by the rules have been left behind while one club operated on a different financial planet. A hundred points does not give those clubs their seasons back. It does not give them the players they lost in the market. It does not give them the titles that were decided before a ball was kicked.
āThey should be relegated. They should be banned from Europe for longer than five years. The ownership should be forced to sell. And every title won during the period under investigation should be stripped. Anything less is an insult to every club that has been competing against an unfair advantage.
āI have said for years that financial rules only matter if they are enforced properly. If the evidence is as serious as these reports suggest, then one hundred points is the minimum, not the maximum. The damage they have caused to the competition is bigger than any single punishment that has been discussed. The league needs to show it is willing to protect itself. Right now, even a hundred points looks like a compromise.ā
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Arsene Wenger did not say this. The quote is fabricated; no credible sources record these statements and his actual comments differ.
sportbible.com/football/footbā¦
inews.co.uk/sport/footballā¦
si.com/soccer/how-manā¦
120km done after a nice walk today. Please help if you can. #freepalestine #stridingforpalestinians2026 #ynwa
medicalaidforpalestinians.enā¦
Just shy of 93km overall and over 15k today. Thatāll do for now. These 66 year old legs are doing ok and well better than my lungs š« š #stridingforpalestinians šµšø
Please give a little and/or share.
medicalaidforpalestinians.enā¦
Iām off out walking again today. Hopefully Iāll break through 100km point on my virtual walk from Jenin to Gaza.
Please share this post - this is really important in maximising my reach and to ask everyone to drop a couple of quid into the fund.
#stridingforpalestinians26 #YNWA
This šÆ
How long is the stench of the āshamā going to corrode the meaning, worth, and very essence of the Premier League?
Listening to commentary about Manchester Cityās players matching the defiance of their ownership and triumphing in adversity.
Listening to fans chorusing the names of the men running the club, wearing masks or displaying banners of their faces and jibing: āWeāre Man City, weāll cheat when we want.ā
Victory being framed as āa lovely moment,ā a show of togetherness as though some grave injustice has been imposed on City, rather than their hierarchy being found by an independent commission to have orchestrated financial doping on an industrial scale.
Their opponents and the rest of us wondering if any of this actually matters now and how much of it ever did?
There can be no business as usual pretence. We need a full stop to the absurdity.
šØ Roy Keane on Ryan Gravenberchās red card against Manchester City:
āI watched it back because I thought I must have missed something.
Gravenberch is already on a yellow. Doku is trying to get away, Ryan tries to get a foot to the ball, catches him and the referee gives the foul. Fine. Nobody is arguing about the foul.
Then Chris Kavanagh reaches for his pocket again.
I said, āWhatās he doing?ā
The lad next to me goes, āHeās sending him off.ā
āFor that?ā
And there it is. Second yellow. Liverpool bloody down to 10 men.
Now people will say, āRoy, he was already booked. He should know better.ā Of course he should be careful. But being on a yellow card doesnāt mean you stop being a footballer. Heās allowed to compete for the ball.
Look at the challenge. Heās not flying in with both feet. Heās not going over the top of the ball. He doesnāt wipe Doku out with some wild lunge. Heās trying to make a challenge, gets it wrong, and Doku gets back up.
Itās around the middle of the pitch. Gravenberch isnāt the last defender. Weāre not talking about a striker clean through on goal. You can give a free kick there and carry on playing football.
And donāt start telling me the referee had no choice. He did have a choice. Thatās the whole point.
Someone said, āBut Roy, the referee doesnāt have to warn him first.ā
I said, āI know the rules. Iām not asking him to send Ryan a letter.ā
A warning isnāt compulsory. A bit of judgement would be nice, though. Youāre about to take one of the best players on the pitch out of Liverpool against Manchester City. Youād better be certain the challenge deserves another booking.
I thought Gravenberch was excellent in that first half. Taking the ball under pressure, driving past City players, making their midfield turn and chase him. He was giving Liverpool a way to get up the pitch.
And then heās walking down the tunnel for a challenge that, to me, is an ordinary foul.
You could see what happened to the game afterwards. City have an extra man, Liverpool have lost a player who was carrying them through midfield, and suddenly the whole thing changes.
I played for Manchester United. Iāve got no reason to sit here making excuses for Liverpool. If Gravenberch had gone in recklessly, Iād be the first to say he deserved it.
But I played in enough of these matches to know the difference between a player losing his head and a player getting his timing wrong.
Ryan got his timing wrong. The referee, in my opinion, got the bigger decision wrong.
And the worst part? Tomorrow people will look at the score and say City were simply too good.
What we do know is that at 0ā0, with eleven against eleven, Liverpool were in the game. Thatās the match I wanted to see finished.
Not one decided by a referee who seemed in a greater hurry to reach for his pocket than to think about what heād actually seen.ā



















