@IndeMedActioni
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
IndeMed is a physician-led organization dedicated to protecting the integrity and fair implementation of the No Surprises Act.
Washington, DC
Joined November 2025
- Tweets163
- Following202
- Followers330
- Likes99
IndeMed retweeted
The Greedy Health Insurers are full force to protect profits by misleading employers, government officials and even think tanks. It’s simple. Pay providers a reasonable rate for caring for patients and stop the Obstruct, Deny and Delay to protect profits. axios.com/2026/09/17/surpris…
IndeMed retweeted
Replying to @RepGregMurphy
@RepGregMurphy knocks it out of the park on this post.
IDR is absolutely fantastic for physicians.
Payers are paying influencers and lobbyists to have their way.
This is a fight all physicians ought to support.
IndeMed retweeted
Those who blame the Docs for the No Surprises Act issues are sadly misinformed. There are bad apples, and they need to be addressed, but when the IDR process rules for the Docs 80-90% of the time and the Insurance companies still don’t pay, ask Willie Sutton where the problem is.
IndeMed retweeted
I don’t know the insinuation here (are we blaming hospitals/doctors? Are we saying the system is broken? Both?)
The reality is that this construct has been around since the 1950s.
Insurers designed deductibles to make sure that patients had skin in the game. The thought is that if patients don’t pay anything, patients will overutilize care. The concept was taken from other insurance products (like auto insurance)
A wrinkle in the system that many don’t think about is that a third party, the physician or hospital delivering care, must stop their normal activity of delivering care to ask the patient for money. The physician or hospital didn’t design the plan, didn’t set the deductible/copay/coinsurance, and generally is an innocent bystander. But, the insurer makes the physician or hospital do their dirty work because the insurer AUTOMATICALLY removes the patient owed amount from the amount they pay a doctor. What does that mean? That means a part of a doctor’s paycheck requires them to ask for money from the patient they are supposed to be focused on treating, introducing frustration and distrust into the physician-patient relationship.
Maybe this was a sound idea when the amount patients had to pay was small, but that’s not the case anymore. 75% of Americans have an out of pocket of at least $3,000. High deductible plans are increasing every year. Why? Because insurers have encouraged employers to continue to increase out of pocket amounts to keep insurance premiums down. Don’t want to pay that double digit premium increase next year? Just increase that deductible/copay/coinsurance and your premium will only go up a little bit.
Here’s a little secret… the majority of patients never meet their deductible. Why is that important? Because that means that despite all those sky high premiums you paid, you still paid for every dollar of your own care. The average family pays (in combination with their employer) $27,000 per year but they, on average, get nothing back out of that money they spent.
Today’s premiums are high, in large part, due to massive consolidation and corporate greed. Doctors got tired of telling their patients to pay them money, of tracking down prior authorizations, and all the other tricks insurers use to make sure patients pay every dollar of their care after premiums and the insurer never pays a dollar. Meanwhile both insurers and the federal government have paid doctors less to do more. Just with Medicare alone, doctors are at half of what they should be paid if they kept up with inflation since 2000. Private insurers seized on the governments reductions and similarly ratcheted down payments. Doctors have left private practice in droves into the arms of hospitals and insurers who have seen record profits as they both consolidate into national behemoths.
The system is working exactly as it was designed… to give a few large organizations substantial profit margins. When doctors try to collect those amounts, they are called greedy. When they go out of network, they are called greedy. When they ask for increases in pay consistent with inflation, they are called greedy. Is it any wonder they now go to those same hospitals and insurers and ask for a salary with production based incentives now instead of openly asking for more pay in a public forum?
Let’s write the real stories in the papers, not just surface stories about the symptoms of a sick healthcare system that has been invaded by insurers, hospitals, and government interests.
This is extremely troubling because it can lead to patients delaying care or paying more up front and then having to go back to be reimbursed.
There’s already a lot of confusion in our health care system and doctors and hospitals don’t need to be creating more with these unacceptable demands. We need to fix this.
wsj.com/health/healthcare/wh…
IndeMed retweeted
Thank you…
The IDR process was a backstop. It is utilized for 6% of all claims. That sounds like a backstop
There are bigger fish to fry. Amazing how organized everyone gets the first time doctors get a win in healthcare
I am concerned IDR is not functioning as intended..
I am not concerned about $40 trillion of debt.
I am not concerned about site neutral payments.
I am not concerned about tax exempt hospitals paying Congress for subsidies.
I am not concerned about the take over of rural hospitals by academic medical centers.
I am not concerned about price transparency.
I am not concerned about 500 other things that actually move the needle.
This argument is getting very old.
IndeMed retweeted
The number of bids at or below $1 aren’t just alarming. They are accelerating. In early 2023, $1 or less bids were 2.5% of all claims. By 2025 Q2 that number was 12.5%.
Why are insurers bidding less every quarter? Why don’t they value the services physicians render?
Read more detail here:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
What is saving your life worth?
278,807 times, the insurer offered $1 or $0 for the life-saving care delivered by physicians.
‼️ Insurers will say these were claims they believed didn’t belong in arbitration in the first place. That’s not what the data shows. Every one of these offers came after a certified, neutral federal arbitrator had already reviewed the claim and confirmed it qualified for the process. The eligibility question was already settled. The $0 or $1 offer came after.
Learn more:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
What is saving your life worth?
278,807 times, the insurer offered $1 or $0 for the life-saving care delivered by physicians.
‼️ Insurers will say these were claims they believed didn’t belong in arbitration in the first place. That’s not what the data shows. Every one of these offers came after a certified, neutral federal arbitrator had already reviewed the claim and confirmed it qualified for the process. The eligibility question was already settled. The $0 or $1 offer came after.
Learn more:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
IndeMed retweeted
It just amazes me how little insurers are willing to pay for life saving care. How are they providing value? By literally not paying for life saving care?
What is saving your life worth?
$0 — offered more than 9,000 times for the CT scans that catch strokes, internal bleeding and hidden tumors.
‼️ Insurers will say these were claims they believed didn’t belong in arbitration in the first place. That’s not what the data shows. Every one of these offers came after a certified, neutral federal arbitrator had already reviewed the claim and confirmed it qualified for the process. The eligibility question was already settled. The $0 offer came after.
Learn more from IndeMed:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
IndeMed retweeted
Let me understand this…. A doctor performs a life saving intubation and they don’t even deserve $1? I mean the Starbucks employee at the lobby coffee shop got more in a tip for making a venti iced caramel macchiato, blond espresso, oat milk, three pumps vanilla, two pumps caramel with vanilla sweet cream cold foam.
What is your care worth?
28 times, an insurer offered nothing for emergency intubation — keeping someone breathing who could not breathe on their own.
‼️ Insurers will say these were claims they believed didn’t belong in arbitration in the first place. That’s not what the data shows. Every one of these offers came after a certified, neutral federal arbitrator had already reviewed the claim and confirmed it qualified for the process. The eligibility question was already settled. The $0 offer came after.
Learn more from IndeMed:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
IndeMed retweeted
Them: Docs are greedy. Abolish the IDR. Let someone else set reimbursement rates.
Also Them:
What is your care worth?
28 times, an insurer offered nothing for emergency intubation — keeping someone breathing who could not breathe on their own.
‼️ Insurers will say these were claims they believed didn’t belong in arbitration in the first place. That’s not what the data shows. Every one of these offers came after a certified, neutral federal arbitrator had already reviewed the claim and confirmed it qualified for the process. The eligibility question was already settled. The $0 offer came after.
Learn more from IndeMed:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
What is saving your life worth?
$0 — offered more than 9,000 times for the CT scans that catch strokes, internal bleeding and hidden tumors.
‼️ Insurers will say these were claims they believed didn’t belong in arbitration in the first place. That’s not what the data shows. Every one of these offers came after a certified, neutral federal arbitrator had already reviewed the claim and confirmed it qualified for the process. The eligibility question was already settled. The $0 offer came after.
Learn more from IndeMed:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
IndeMed retweeted
Earlier this year, the Trump administration's new ACA rules encourage health insurers to offer loans for medical bills instead of addressing the soaring out-of-pocket costs driving Americans into debt. For companies like UnitedHealth Group, which already owns a bank within its vast corporate structure, that's a business opportunity.
Read more…..
healthcareuncovered.substack…
What is your care worth?
28 times, an insurer offered nothing for emergency intubation — keeping someone breathing who could not breathe on their own.
‼️ Insurers will say these were claims they believed didn’t belong in arbitration in the first place. That’s not what the data shows. Every one of these offers came after a certified, neutral federal arbitrator had already reviewed the claim and confirmed it qualified for the process. The eligibility question was already settled. The $0 offer came after.
Learn more from IndeMed:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
IndeMed retweeted
Insurers have shined the light on doctors who they feel bid extravagant amounts for their services. When the arbitrators agree with that claim, they cry foul.
I love that IndeMed is now highlighting some of the absurd values insurers have placed on lifesaving care. Critical newborn care…. That’s worth $0? Well it is according to an insurer.
What is your care worth?
26 times, an insurer offered nothing for a newborn baby's first day fighting for its life in intensive care.
‼️ Insurers will say these were claims they believed didn’t belong in arbitration in the first place. That’s not what the data shows. Every one of these offers came after a certified, neutral federal arbitrator had already reviewed the claim and confirmed it qualified for the process. The eligibility question was already settled. The $0 offer came after.
Learn more from IndeMed:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
What is your care worth?
26 times, an insurer offered nothing for a newborn baby's first day fighting for its life in intensive care.
‼️ Insurers will say these were claims they believed didn’t belong in arbitration in the first place. That’s not what the data shows. Every one of these offers came after a certified, neutral federal arbitrator had already reviewed the claim and confirmed it qualified for the process. The eligibility question was already settled. The $0 offer came after.
Learn more from IndeMed:
indemed.org/whats-your-care-…
IndeMed retweeted
When I talk about the claim adjudication process to legislators and employers their eyes seem to glaze over due to the complexity of the games that the insurance companies play. It really isn’t that hard to understand that a claim costs X and thus the plan should pay X and then sure the TPA gets their commission. Employers should be able to see that X paid out = X withdrawn from account- but that’s not the case… When I direct contract with an employer the math is transparent and simple X=X…. With a third party involved - the employer doesn’t know what the doctor actually received…. this is why they wanted patients removed from the balance billing equation- not to save money, but to further disguise what they are doing…. Employers need to audit deidentified claim level detail and ask where the missing money is. Every penny should be accounted for transparently. If not, they are stealing from you.
They don’t give them access to the data because they are robbing them blind. They are also robbing Texas blind…… As a CEO/employer, physician and a patient- I have seen how shiesty they really are behind the scenes. The big boys think they are too big to fail. They will keep doing this until it REALLY hurts. The ONLY solution is to fire them and walk away. Employers- With the rapid evolution of AI- what value will big insurance companies truly bring you when you are able to easily build systems of your own? Employers are being screwed, Doctors are being screwed, and patients are being screwed. Time to remove the middle man. The days of hiding data need to come to an end! #insurancefail #txlege
IndeMed retweeted
I joined the Chris Salcedo Show this morning to discuss what I believe is one of the most imminent threats to independent medical practice: insurer downcoding and downpayment of appropriately documented care.
Physicians provide the care. We document the care. Yet insurers can unilaterally decide that care was worth less—and pay accordingly.
This isn’t simply a reimbursement dispute. When these practices occur systematically, they threaten the financial viability of independent medicine and, ultimately, patients’ access to physician-led care.
Physicians need to speak up. Regulators and lawmakers need to pay attention. And patients need to pay attention too—because protecting independent medicine means protecting your ability to access the physicians and care you choose. #txlege
How The Traitorous Insurance Companies Are targeting Your Healthcare
youtube.com/watch?v=0hImuzBU…
IndeMed retweeted
There has been a lot of criticism of the No Surprises Act IDR process lately.
And as someone who was initially reluctant to utilize it because I didn’t want to limit access, I am now its strongest advocate.
The important thing to understand is that almost none of the criticisms address the more obvious question:
How many opportunities did the insurance company have to resolve the claim before an arbitrator ever made a decision?
The process does not go from a physician submitting a claim directly to arbitration.
The insurer first makes an initial payment or denial.
If the physician believes that payment is inadequate, there is then a mandatory 30 business day open negotiation period specifically intended to allow the parties to agree on a reasonable rate. IDR cannot even be initiated until that period is over. (CMS)
And even after IDR begins, the parties can still resolve the dispute rather than having the arbitrator determine the payment.
So there are multiple opportunities to settle the claim.
The bigger question is:
Are insurers actually using those opportunities to negotiate?
In my experience, overwhelmingly, no.
Most of the time the “open negotiation” period is simply quiet.
Sometimes you receive a response offering a very small additional amount.
Across all the claims I have personally been involved with, I can remember one time where there was what I would consider an actual back and forth negotiation over a reasonable payment.
Apparently that experience is not unique.
CMS has now acknowledged receiving numerous reports that parties were not meaningfully engaging in open negotiation before proceeding to IDR. (CMS)
The problem was significant enough that the federal government changed the process and created a formal response requirement during the negotiation period, specifically to improve communication and encourage meaningful negotiation before arbitration. (CMS)
Think about that.
We created a 30 business day negotiation period.
Insurers have an opportunity to make a reasonable initial payment.
They then have another opportunity to negotiate that payment.
The parties can still resolve the claim after IDR begins.
Yet enormous numbers of disputes still make it all the way to an arbitrator.
And then insurers point to the arbitration results and argue that IDR is the problem.
Maybe arbitration is not the first place we should be looking.
Maybe we should be asking why so many claims ever needed arbitration in the first place.
If insurers do not want physicians using IDR, make a reasonable payment.
If they do not want cases going to arbitration, actually negotiate during the negotiation period.
And if they want independent physicians to stay in network, offer reasonable contracted rates.
Arbitration was supposed to be the last resort when negotiation failed.
But if one side barely participates in the negotiation process, it is pretty disingenuous to blame the arbitrator when the dispute ultimately has to be decided.